§. 8. Philo the Jew.
Philo was a Jew by Nation, and Alexandrian by birth: by line, of the kindred of the Priests; and by family, the brother of Alexander Alabarcha. His education was in learning, and that mixed, according to his original and residence, of the Jews and of the Greeks: his proof was according to his education, versed in the learning of both the Nations, and not inferior to the most learned in either: From this mixture of his know∣ledge, proceeded the quaintness of his stile and writing; explaining Divinity by Philo∣sophy, or rather forcing Philosopy out of Divinity, that he spoiled the one, and did not much mend the other. Hence his Allegories which did not only obscure the clear Text, but also much soil the Theology of succeeding times. His language is sweet, smooth, and easie, and Athens it self is not more elegant and Athenian. For attaining to the Greek in Alexandria, partly naturally, (that being a Grecian City) and partly by study, (as not native Grecians used to do) he by a mixture of these two together, came to the ve∣ry Apex and perfection of the language, in copiousness of words, and in choice. His stile is always fluent, and indeed often to superfluity, dilating his expressions sometimes so copious, that he is rather prodigal of words, than liberal, and sheweth what he could say if the cause required, b•• saying so much, when there is little or no cause at all. And to give him his character for this, in short, He is more a Philosopher than a Scripture man in heart, and more a Rhetorician than a Philosopher in tongue. His manner of writing is more ingenious than solid, and seemeth rather to draw the subject whereon he writeth whither his fancy pleaseth, than to follow it whither the nature and inclination of it doth incline. Hence his allegorizing of whatsoever cometh to his hand, and his perem∣ptory confidence in whatsoever he doth allegorize, insomuch that sometimes he perswad∣eth himself that he speaketh mysteries, as pag 89. and sometimes he checketh the Scripture, if it speak not as he would have it▪ as pag. 100.
How too many of the Fathers in the Primitive Church followed him in this his vein, it is too well known, to the loss of too much time, both in their writing and in our read∣ing. Whether it were because he was the first that wrote upon the Bible, or rather be∣cause he was the first that wrote in this strain, whose writings came unto their hands, that brought him into credit with Christian Writers, he was so far followed by too many, that while they would explain Scripture, they did but intricate it, and hazarded to lose the truth of the story, under the cloud of the Allegory. The Jews have a strain of wri∣ting upon the Scripture, that flieth in a higher region than the writings of Christians, as is apparent to him that shall read their Authors. Now Philo being a Jew, and naturally affecting like them to soar in a high place, and being by his education in the Grecian wisdom more Philosophical than the Jews usually were, and by inclination much affected with that learning, he soareth the Jewish pitch with his Grecian wings, and attaineth to a place in which none had flown in before (unless the Therapeutae, of whom hereafter) writing in a strain that none had used before, and which too many, or at least many