And it may be understood in two Respects, That Christ was cut off, and not for Himself.
1. In Respect of any Demerit or Fault of his. There were many that pretended to be the Messiah, that were Thieves and Murderers, and were cut off, but 'twas justly for their Offences. But the Angel pre∣vents here the least Suspicion, that the True Messiah should be a Guilty Person, cut off for his own Crimes. He did no Sin, as St Peter says, neither was Guile found in his mouth: But he could make that bold Challenge to all the Nations of the Jews, Which of you convinceth me of Sin? It fared indeed with him, as it did with David, a good King, and his Type, who Psal. the 59th and the 3d, complains of his Enemies after this manner, They lye in wait for my Soul, the Mighty are gathered against me; not for My Transgressions, nor for my Sin, O Lord! they run and prepare themselves without my Fault. No: if any man could take away our Messiah, by justly alledging Impiety against him, we would readily deliver him up our selves: But when he was Holy in his Life and Doctrine, when his Righteousness was attested from Heaven before, and in, and after his being in the World, by Prophecies, Miracles, by the Voice, to use St Peter's expression, which came to him from the Excel∣lent Glory, saying, This is my Beloved Son in whom I am well-pleased: by his Resurrection, Ascension, and sending the Holy Ghost, we may well adhere to such a Saviour, and excuse the seeming Shame of his Cutting off, for those real Glories which none beside himself ever pretended to.
2. Not for himself, in respect of any Benefit he re∣ceived. If the Angel had told the Prophet, That the Cutting off of the Messiah had been for any Personal Advantage of his own, though he had taken