Page 37
The reasons of our mistrusting of Antiquities.
1 IT is the common practise of men to measure matters of Ancient times, by observation of the times and place wherein they live: as commonly we passe our censure on other mens actions and intentions, according to our own resolutions and secret purposes in like cases. And, besides this general occasion of mistaking other mens actions, and events of other times, every particular sort of men seek to assign causes of things sutable unto their proper Faculties. The Natural Philosopher striveth to reduce all effects to Matter and Form, or some sensible qualitie; the Mathematician, to abstract Forms or Fi∣gures, or insensible influences; the Politician thinks no alteration in publick States, or private mens affairs, fals out, but from some Politick cause or Pur∣pose of man: and whilest in the Annals of Antiquities he reads of sundry events, surpassing the reach or skill of mans invention, or contrary to the or∣dinarie course of nature, he attributes all unto the Simplicity or credulitie of their Ancestors. Albeit, if we should search the true cause of their creduli∣tie in yielding assent unto such strange reports, it will easily confute the error of posterity: for this credulity in such particulars, could not have been so great in their Ancestors, unlesse their mindes had been first inclined to the ge∣neral, from the tradition of their Predecessors. But why their forefathers should either have invented such strange reports, or be so inclinable to be∣lieve them: if we search into the depth or first spring of this perswasion, we cannot imagine any other cause, but the real and sensible Experience of such strange events as they reported to posterity. This did enforce Belief upon the first Progenitors of any Nation: and from the fulnesse of this perswasion, or actual Belief in them, was bred this credulitie or aptnesse in posterity, to be∣lieve the like, which yet in successe of time did by little and little wear out. It is great simplicity and uncharitable credulitie in us, to think, that either the most Ancient, or middle Ages of the world, were generally so simple, cre∣dulous, or apt to believe every thing, as some would make them. It had been as hard a matter to have perswaded men of those times, that there were no Gods, no divine power or providence: as it would be to perswade the mo∣dern Athiests, that there is an Almighty power, which created all things; go∣verneth and disposeth of all things to his glory. The most politick Athe••st now alive, is as Credulous in his kinde, as the simplest creature in the old world was: and will yield his assent unto the Epicures or other Brutish Philosophers conclu∣sions, upon as light reasons, as they did their Belief unto any Fable concern∣ing the power or providence of the Gods: the reason of both their credulities in two contrary kindes, is the same. The often manifestation of an extraor∣dinary power in Battels, or presence in Oracles, and sensible documents of revenge from heaven, made the one prone to entertain any report of the Gods, though never so strange: and the want of like sensible signs or documents of the same power in our dayes (whilest all mens minds are still set upon poli∣tick means and practises for their own good) doth make the other so credu∣lous and apt to assent to any Politik Discourse, and so averse from Belief of the Prophets or sacred Writers, which reduce all effects to the First Cause. But this we cannot do so immediately as the Ancient did: because God useth his Wisdom more in the managing of this Politick world, then he did in times of old; and men naturally are lesse apprehensive of His Wisdom, then of His Pow∣er;