A second part of The mixture of scholasticall divinity, with practical, in several tractates: wherein some of the most difficult knots in divinity are untyed, many dark places of Scripture cleared, sundry heresies and errors refuted ... Whereunto are annexed, several letters of the same author, and Dr. Jeremy Taylor, concerning Original Sin. Together with a reply unto Dr. Hammonds vindication of his grounds of uniformity from 1 Cor. 14.40. By Henry Jeanes, minister of Gods Word at Chedzoy in Somersetshire.

About this Item

Title
A second part of The mixture of scholasticall divinity, with practical, in several tractates: wherein some of the most difficult knots in divinity are untyed, many dark places of Scripture cleared, sundry heresies and errors refuted ... Whereunto are annexed, several letters of the same author, and Dr. Jeremy Taylor, concerning Original Sin. Together with a reply unto Dr. Hammonds vindication of his grounds of uniformity from 1 Cor. 14.40. By Henry Jeanes, minister of Gods Word at Chedzoy in Somersetshire.
Author
Jeanes, Henry, 1611-1662.
Publication
Oxford :: printed by H. Hall [and A. Lichfield], printer to the University, for Thomas Robinson,
1660.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Hammond, Henry, 1605-1660. -- Euschēmonōs kai kata taxin.
Taylor, Jeremy, 1613-1667. -- Unum necessarium.
Theology, Doctrinal -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A46699.0001.001
Cite this Item
"A second part of The mixture of scholasticall divinity, with practical, in several tractates: wherein some of the most difficult knots in divinity are untyed, many dark places of Scripture cleared, sundry heresies and errors refuted ... Whereunto are annexed, several letters of the same author, and Dr. Jeremy Taylor, concerning Original Sin. Together with a reply unto Dr. Hammonds vindication of his grounds of uniformity from 1 Cor. 14.40. By Henry Jeanes, minister of Gods Word at Chedzoy in Somersetshire." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A46699.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 1, 2024.

Pages

Dr. Hammond. sect. 15.

This is indeed his meaning, which (though somewhat darkned in that his expression) will appear but consequent to the two things which he hath premised in this matter from Amesius his notion of decency. p. 64. in marg. 1. that 〈◊〉〈◊〉 requires not that any sacred things be instituted de 〈◊〉〈◊〉, but onely that those things which are instituted by God, be used in that 〈◊〉〈◊〉 which is agreeable to the dignity of them. 2. That as order, so decency belongs to civil offices, as well as sacred things, in which indecorum est vitium oppositum debito illi modo, qui 〈◊〉〈◊〉 ad corum justum finem, & usum consequendum, 〈◊〉〈◊〉 is a vice opposed to that due manner which is 〈◊〉〈◊〉 to the obtaining the just end, and use of those things. Now if in the 〈◊〉〈◊〉 of 〈◊〉〈◊〉, the mode he speaks of, as agreeable to the dignity of those things which are 〈◊〉〈◊〉, be it self-supposed by him to be 〈◊〉〈◊〉 by men, then must he acknowledge humane 〈◊〉〈◊〉 of 〈◊〉〈◊〉 ceremonies, which being so contrary to his design, I must 〈◊〉〈◊〉 〈◊〉〈◊〉 to be 〈◊〉〈◊〉 〈◊〉〈◊〉 by him; but rather, 〈◊〉〈◊〉 as the sacred things 〈◊〉〈◊〉 instituted by 〈◊〉〈◊〉, so the mode which is consentaneous to their dignity is instituted 〈◊〉〈◊〉 God also, and 〈◊〉〈◊〉 〈◊〉〈◊〉 is decent in sacris, which is not so instituted. And so 〈◊〉〈◊〉 〈◊〉〈◊〉 on the second 〈◊〉〈◊〉, that of civill 〈◊〉〈◊〉. For that indecency, which is a vice or sin, must be 〈◊〉〈◊〉 to 〈◊〉〈◊〉 Law of Gods, and so also that which is 〈◊〉〈◊〉 to the 〈◊〉〈◊〉 manner which is 〈◊〉〈◊〉; 〈◊〉〈◊〉 so is necessary either necessitate medii, or praecepti also to obtaining a just end, this sure is more than the omission of an indifferent 〈◊〉〈◊〉, 〈◊〉〈◊〉 may, or may not be conti∣nued

Page 12

without any offence against nature, even the omission of strict universal duty, either natural decency, or somewhat that bears proportion with it.

Jeanes.

Both Ames and my poor self 〈◊〉〈◊〉, 〈◊〉〈◊〉 God hath by the Canon of the A∣postle, and by the light of Nature, appointed and commanded, that 〈◊〉〈◊〉 in his worship and service, the neglect 〈◊〉〈◊〉 would be undecent; but that hee holds that there is need of a special divine institution to render a thing decent, is dis∣claimed by Ames in several places of his writings: Medul. Theol. lib. 2. c. 14. sect. 24, 25, 26. Hujusmodi igitur 〈◊〉〈◊〉, quae 〈◊〉〈◊〉 naturâ sunt civiles, aut com∣munes. nen sunt particulariter in 〈◊〉〈◊〉 praeceptae, partim, quia in 〈◊〉〈◊〉 hominum sensum incurrunt; & 〈◊〉〈◊〉, quia infra dignitatem & 〈◊〉〈◊〉 legis 〈◊〉〈◊〉 〈◊〉〈◊〉, ut talia 〈◊〉〈◊〉 in illa praescribantur, hâc 〈◊〉〈◊〉 ratione 〈◊〉〈◊〉 〈◊〉〈◊〉 fuissent singu∣lari lege cavenda: Exempli gratiâ, ne in ecclesiastico, 〈◊〉〈◊〉 〈◊〉〈◊〉 in 〈◊〉〈◊〉 sinu sese colocaret, in alterius 〈◊〉〈◊〉 〈◊〉〈◊〉, out ne 〈◊〉〈◊〉 〈◊〉〈◊〉 in sacris actionibus. Habendae 〈◊〉〈◊〉 sunt 〈◊〉〈◊〉 ex 〈◊〉〈◊〉 Dei 〈◊〉〈◊〉. 1. Quta in genere 〈◊〉〈◊〉, sub lege ordinis, decori, & 〈◊〉〈◊〉. 2 Quia pleraeque 〈◊〉〈◊〉 〈◊〉〈◊〉 se∣quuntur ex 〈◊〉〈◊〉 quae 〈◊〉〈◊〉 〈◊〉〈◊〉 sunt 〈◊〉〈◊〉 constituta. 〈◊〉〈◊〉 enim 〈◊〉〈◊〉 constituit, 〈◊〉〈◊〉 fide∣les omnis generis convenirent, ad 〈◊〉〈◊〉 nomen & 〈◊〉〈◊〉 〈◊〉〈◊〉, 〈◊〉〈◊〉 e∣tiam 〈◊〉〈◊〉, ut 〈◊〉〈◊〉 & 〈◊〉〈◊〉 〈◊〉〈◊〉 locum habeant, in quo possint conve∣nire, & 〈◊〉〈◊〉 etiam assignatam, qua 〈◊〉〈◊〉 〈◊〉〈◊〉 〈◊〉〈◊〉; 〈◊〉〈◊〉 etiam minister à Des sit constitutus ad alios 〈◊〉〈◊〉 instituendos, fimul etiam constituitur, ut 〈◊〉〈◊〉 & fitum cor∣poris illum habeat, qui tali 〈◊〉〈◊〉 congruit.

25. Illa igitur quae pertinent ad ordinem & decorum, non ita relinquuntur 〈◊〉〈◊〉 〈◊〉〈◊〉; ut 〈◊〉〈◊〉, quod 〈◊〉〈◊〉 libet, sub illo nomine 〈◊〉〈◊〉 〈◊〉〈◊〉; 〈◊〉〈◊〉 partim de∣terminantur 〈◊〉〈◊〉 〈◊〉〈◊〉 〈◊〉〈◊〉, 〈◊〉〈◊〉 natura ipsarum rerum, & partim circum∣stantiis illis, quae ex occasione sese 〈◊〉〈◊〉.

26. Variae enim 〈◊〉〈◊〉 & 〈◊〉〈◊〉 circumstantiae tales sunt, ut nulla institutione pub∣lica accedente, debeant tamen à singulis observari, neque 〈◊〉〈◊〉 〈◊〉〈◊〉 hominibus prohiberi sine 〈◊〉〈◊〉.

24.

Such like circumstances therefore, which of their own nature are civil or common, are not particularly commanded in the Scriptures, partly because they come into mens common sense, and partly because it would not stand with the dignity and majesty of the Law of God, that such things should be severally prescribed in it. For by this 〈◊〉〈◊〉 many ridiculous 〈◊〉〈◊〉 should have been provided for by a special Law; as for example, that in the Church assenibly one should not place himself in anothers 〈◊〉〈◊〉, spit in anothers face, or should not make monthes in holy actions: Yet they are to be accoun∣ted as commanded from God: 1. Because they are 〈◊〉〈◊〉 in generall under the Law of 〈◊〉〈◊〉, Decency, and 〈◊〉〈◊〉. 2. Because most of them doe necessarily follow from those things which are 〈◊〉〈◊〉 appointed by God. For when God appointed that the faithfull of all sorts should meet to∣gether to celebrate his name, and worship, he did consequently 〈◊〉〈◊〉 that they should have a sit and conventent place, wherein they may meet together, and an hour also assigned at which they may be 〈◊〉〈◊〉 together: when also there is a Minister appointed by God to teach others publiquely, it is withall appointed that he have a seat which is meet for such an action.

25.

Those things therefore which pertain to order and decency, are not so 〈◊〉〈◊〉 to mens wills, that they may under the name of that, 〈◊〉〈◊〉 what

Page 13

they please upon the 〈◊〉〈◊〉: but they are partly determined by the general precepts of God, partly by the nature of the things themselves, and partly by those circumstances which doe offer themselves upon oc∣casion.

26.

For divers circumstances of order and decency are such, as though there be no publique institution of them, yet they 〈◊〉〈◊〉 to be observed of every one, neither can men forbid them without sin.
Unto this adde another place in his 〈◊〉〈◊〉 soit against Ceremonies, disput. pag. 29.
We never said, or thought, that all particular rites pertaining to order and decency are punctually deter∣mined in the Scripture. We never dreamed, that all such 〈◊〉〈◊〉 being beside the particular determination of the Scripture, are against it, we speak of double, or treble rites as the Rejoinder 〈◊〉〈◊〉 them, 〈◊〉〈◊〉 no meer order and decency doth 〈◊〉〈◊〉 require, but onely the meer will of man 〈◊〉〈◊〉.
That which is instituted by God in his worship, 〈◊〉〈◊〉 〈◊〉〈◊〉 〈◊〉〈◊〉 well to be a part of Gods worship; but that decency 〈◊〉〈◊〉 no part of Gods worship, Ames in his disput. pag. 176. proves by a Reason quoted out of 〈◊〉〈◊〉. 〈◊〉〈◊〉, Def of Mr. 〈◊〉〈◊〉. pag 844
Order and comeliness (saith the Popish Bishop) is some part of 〈◊〉〈◊〉 worship. But (saith Dr. Abbot) who taught him this deep point of Philosophy, that an accident is a part of the subject, that the beauty or comelinesse of the body is a part of the body, order and 〈◊〉〈◊〉 pro∣perly and immediately respect men, and therefore can be no parts of the worship of God.
To be instituted by God, if we speake 〈◊〉〈◊〉 & properly, is to be injoyned by a divine positive Law superadded unto the law of 〈◊〉〈◊〉; and in conformity hereunto it is that our Author Ames divides Gods worship, Med. lib. 2. cap. 5. into natural and instituted: Now if this be your meaning, when you impute unto Ames and me, that our opinion is, that nothing is decent in 〈◊〉〈◊〉, which is not instituted by God, as the charge is false in it self, so it proveth not that which you bring it for, viz. that in our sense decency in the Apostle, is only that decency which the law of nature prescribes; but 〈◊〉〈◊〉 the clean con∣trary, because that which is instituted by a positive law superadded to the law of nature, is not prescribed 〈◊〉〈◊〉 and immediatè by the law of nature.

You are by this time, I hope, conscious of the great injury you have done unto poor Dr. Ames, in 〈◊〉〈◊〉 unto him so irrational an opinion, and hereupon I shall be bold to give you this advertisement, that however you may despise him as a mean Author, unworthy of your perusal, yet, if you undertake to 〈◊〉〈◊〉 and refute him, you must read him, or else you will be very lyable unto the breach of the ninth Commandement, Thou shalt not bear false witnesse against thy neighbour.

But you will perhaps say in defence of your self, that if it were not the opi∣nion of Ames, it is the sequele of his words; and for this you have two reasons.

The 1. because the mode or manner agreeable unto the dignity of sacred things is instituted by God, as the sacred things are instituted by God: But this proposition, if it be particular, 〈◊〉〈◊〉 nothing, and if it be universal, is false, as you might have seen in the next reason of Ames, but that you cannot see wood for trees, as the Proverb is; There is a mode or manner in the use of sa∣cred things agreeable unto their dignitie, that is not adequate, proper, and peculiar to them, but common unto civill matters of a grave nature together with them; and this is a matter inculcated by Dr. Ames in many places,

Page 14

which if you had weighed, you would never have troubled the Reader with this objection, Medul. Theol. lib. cap. 14. th: 23. 〈◊〉〈◊〉 igitur hujusmodi cir∣cumstantiae vocari soleant à nonnullis ritus & ceremoniae religiosae, 〈◊〉〈◊〉 ecclesiasticae, nihil tamen habent in sua natura, quod proprium est religionis, atque adeo in iis non propriè consistit cultus 〈◊〉〈◊〉, 〈◊〉〈◊〉 ex corum neglectu, & contemptu violatur a∣liquo modo 〈◊〉〈◊〉 cultus religiosi; quia communis illa ratio ordinis & decori quae ae∣què convenit religiosis actibus, 〈◊〉〈◊〉 que civilibus, à religioso cultu non potest separart, quin oliquo modo 〈◊〉〈◊〉 ipsius dignitas & majestas.

Although these circumstances of time, place, and other like, are wont by some to be called rites, or religious Ecclesiastical ceremonies, yet in their nature they have nothing that is proper to Religion, and therefore religious worship 〈◊〉〈◊〉 not properly consist in them, however by neglect and contempt of such circumstances, the sanctity of such re∣ligious worship is in some sort violated, because the common respect of order and decency, which do equally agree to religious and civil actions cannot bee severed from religious worship, without diminishing of the sanctity and digni∣ty of it.

Thus also largely in his Manuduction to the dispute about humane Ceremo∣nies, pag. 55, 56.

If men and 〈◊〉〈◊〉 come purposely in their best apparel to Church, if they compose themselves to a grave posture, give the upper place to the chiefest persons, and take such to themselves as they may hear the 〈◊〉〈◊〉 in, and yet have no exception taken against them for it, if all the places and seats be made cleanly, and fit for a meeting, to be held in a 〈◊〉〈◊〉 fashion, all these are Ceremonies according to the Rejoinder his definition, yet no man but out of contention will affirm, they are meerly religious or ecclesiasticall: For all these in the same manner, and to the same immediate end, the same per∣sons would doe, if the meeting were to hear the Magistrate propound unto them a grave civil businesse, concerning the Commonwealth affairs. And sure∣ly that which remaining the same may be civil, is not meerly and properly ec∣clesiastical, but common to both uses, and rather meerly civil, than meerly ec∣clesiastical; because civility is supposed and included in ecclesiastical affairs, but ecclesiastical proceedings are not supposed and included in civil. Dr. Jackson in his original of unbelief, pag. 337. doth well observe, that decent behaviour doth change the subject onely, not alter its own nature and form, whilst it is used in matters sacred, nor is the habit of civil complement, or good man∣ners, such an unhallowed weed, as must be layd aside when wee come into the Sanctuary. And indeed there is no more reason to shut civility out of the Church or sacred businesse, than to shut Religion out of the Town house, or civil affairs.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.