Annotations on Chap. XIX.
[ a] * 1.1 V. 12. Eunuches] The word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 and 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 have a vulgar ordinary signification, which is known by the English use of the word Eunuch, that is, in the expressions of the Grammarians, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, &c. And accordingly three sorts of them are ordinarily set down, 1. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 castrati; 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, 2. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, and 3. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 and 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, But here the Context which sets it in opposition to marrying, makes it clear, that Eunuchisme is taken for the chastity of a single life, howsoever acquired, whether 1. by naturall temper, or 2. by some outward acci∣dentall weakning, or debilitating of nature, as was frequent among the Gentiles, in order to some offices and services, to which men, that were thereby secured from desires, were designed; Such, if it were done by themselves, are called by the Apostles Canons, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 self-murtherers, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, enemies of Gods workmanship, Can. 22, 23. or 3ly, by firm purpose or resolution of mind, assisted by Gods grace, in order to his service; such were the ascetae, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, those that imposed hardships on themselves, and combated with their own desires. Thus in Phavorinus, the word being deduced according to some Grammarians from 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, to have the mind well or wisely disposed, it signifies, saith he, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, to have nothing to doe with any thing of venery or carnality, for, saith he, the Ancients 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, call'd all things of that kind, follies; Thus we know the Scripture hath express'd any such unlawfull commission, the doing folly in Israel, and so 'tis cited out of Aristophanes, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, to abstain from sleep and all foolish things, where yet Aristophanes hath only 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, which the Scholiast expounds by 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, saith he. But 'tis possible that the place in Aristophanes is to be read 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 in stead of 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, and then there is no question, but that 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 sleep might be a civil word for things of that nature, as in the Wise man, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 sig∣nifies.
[ b] * 1.2 V. 21. Perfect] What is the notion of 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 perfection here, must be defined by considering what is meant by entring into the kingdome of heaven, v. 23. For it appeareth that the not undertaking the condi∣tion required of the young man by Christ, to his being perfect, doth also exclude him from entring into this kingdome, or render him uncapable of it. Now that kingdome of heaven, signifying that crown of eternall life and blisse, which was this mans aime, v. 16. the entring into that kingdome is the undertaking the con∣dition now required by Christ, or the attaining that blisse by performing that condition, and therefore his going away v. 22. that is, forsaking of Christ, caused by the greatnesse of his riches, is all one with the rich mans not being able to enter into that kingdome v. 23. This again appeareth by the question and answer en∣suing, v. 25. where when the Disciples aske, Who then can be saved? (whatsoever they mean by that, whether, who can be a Christian? as the word rendred escaping or being saved often signifies, (see Mat. 10. h. Lu. 13. b. and Rom. 10. a.) or whether who can come to heaven?) Christs answer is, by looking upon them, &c. intimating them to be examples of this possibility, capable of this salvation, this entering into the king∣dome of heaven, as having perform'd the condition re∣quited to qualifie them ••or it. From these premises it seems necessary to conclude that the perfection here spoken of is Christianity it self, (and not only an heroick eminent degree of it) and that the condition here re∣quired to it is matter of command, not counsel only, and such, as he that will not ascend to, (the young man here) cannot be called or deemed a Christian, can∣not attain to blisse, as 'tis now offered under the Gospel. From hence it followes not, that no man is saveable, or a Christian, but he that sells all, and gives it to the poor, and so followes Christ, for there is no command elswhere given by Christ to all men to doe so, (and this command here given to this young man, and the like, in some degree, to the Disciples, to leave their nets, that is, their whole estates, and follow him, obliges none but those to whom it was given) but only thus, that he that loves any thing more then Christ, is no Christian, that whatsoever Christ shall at any time by any explicite command, as here, or else by his provi∣dence (by making it impossible to preserve my fidelity to him, or obedience to any known command of his, without parting with my wealth &c.) require of me, I must impartially perform it, though it be with the losse of my estate, or even of life it self, and if I doe not resolve, and undertake to doe so, I cannot be saved, I am no Christian. Or if having vowed it, (as every Christian doth in Baptisme, vowing there, whenso∣ever the world comes in competition with Christ, to forsake the world and follow Christ) I doe not in time of tryall perform it, I forfeit the priviledges of Christi∣anity, all title to blisse. And this is it that maketh it so hard a thing for the rich man, and even so impossible for him that trusteth in riches, Mar. 10. 24. (that hath reposed any confidence in them, that depends, or looks on them as his felicity) to enter this kingdome, to be, and continue Christian, to attain this perfection or this blisse; for, where his treasure is, there will his hear•• be also.
[ c] * 1.3 V. 24. Camel] It was an ordinary proverb among the Jewes that An Elephant cannot passe through the eye of a needle to signifie the most impossible thing. Thus in the Babyl.* 1.4 Talmud▪ Perek Haroe Barachoth, You perhaps are one of Pombeditha (an Academy of Jewes in Babylon) where they can make an Elephant passe through a needles eye; signifying them a vain-glorious people, that would boast of doing impossibilities, and in Gemara 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 there is no Elephant that enters by the hole of a needle. This proverb Christ was willing to change from the Ele∣phant, which was a beast that few had seen, to a Ca∣mell, which was very ordinary in Syria, and whose bunch on his back is apt to hinder his passage through any narrow entrance. This being thus premised, as the full account of the place, it is yet farther observable