Page 862
THE [note a] REVELATION OF John [note b] the Divine. (Book Apocalypse)
[ a] * 1.1 THE title of this Book as it is ordinarily set, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, the Revelation of John the Di∣vine, hath in it some seeming difference from the first words of the Book, which were written by S. John himself, (Whereas that other (as the rest of the titles of the Books of the New Testament) was by the Church of the first ages affix'd unto it,) 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, the Revelation of Jesus Christ. And this difference is to be reconciled, not by making one of them to refer to the person that received, the other to him that gave the Revelation;* 1.2 for as John received it from Christ, so Christ also received it from his Father, and therefore 'tis here added v. 1. which God gave him: but it must be by distinguishing of the time and manner of these revea∣lings. God formerly revealed these future events to Christ the Son of man, as the Mediatour by him now de∣signed to conveigh all knowledge and grave to us; and this he did when Christ entred on his Prophetick office (long before the time here specified from whence it was that Christ, whilst on earth, forethold (in the para∣ble of the King and the Husbandmen, Luk 20. 16. and Mat. 24. and sparsim at other times) many of the particulars represented in this prophecie, especially that of the destruction of the unbelieving Jews. And in this respect this whole Book is entituled the Revelation of Jesus Christ, that is, that prophecie which Jessus Christ received from his Father, as the vision of Isaiah, &c. is the Prophecie which Isaiah received from God, or, that God gave to Isaiah. But then as Christ thought fit to give a representation of this to his beloved disciple, John, and so John received it, as a prophecie, to deliver to others, so 'tis fitly styled (here in the titile) the Reve∣lation of John, who received it (in visions, or extasie, v. 10.) by the Angel from Christ, as Christ received it from his Father.* 1.3 For this is the meaning of the word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Revelation, a word ordinarily used in Da∣niel, to signifie any knowlege extraordinarily communicated any by God. Thus is the word used 2 Cor. 12.* 1.4 1. where he puts together visions and revelations of the Lord (and perhaps expresses it, v. 2. by 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 a man in Christ, as here ver. 10. by being in the Spirit snatch'd into the third Heaven,) so again ver. 7. abundance of Revelations. So. Gal. 2 2. I went up by Revelation, that is, by impulsion of the Spirit of God, and Ephes. 3. 3. by Revelation (that is, by Christ's speaking to him from heaven, and other the like vision, which, it appears, he had, 2 Cor. 12. 7.) God made known to me the mystery. In other places the word is used in a greater latitude, for and exposition or interpritation of any sacred figure, &c. however come by though not by immediate inspiration from God, the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 among the Hebrews, expounding of difficulties (see Note on 1 Cor. 14▪ b.) and yed more widely 1 Pet. 1. 7. for Christ's revealing himself in judgment on his adversaries, and rescuing the faithful. But here it is according to strict idiome to more then vision or prophecie, and so the title of Enochs book, citied Jude 15. was 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 the Revelation of Enoch, but in S. Jude's style (〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉) the prophecy of Enoch. And if in this notion of the word (which is peculiarly that which here and c. 1. 1. belongs to it) Mr brightman intituled his comment on this book Apocalypsim 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 the Rlevelation of the Revelation (as it seems he did by * 1.5 applying the words of Scripture, The Lord hath spoken who can but prophesie? to his own performances in that Comment, adding that God not onely speke of old by dreams and visions, but daily now, whensoever he inlightens the minds of his servants to the fetching out any hidden truth of his word: and that when God doth thus communicate with any, he understandeth a necessary imposed on him to makee it known to others, and that the danger is not sh••wn to him for his own private sake) I cannot but affirm that be hath grossely mistaken his businesse and endevoured to impose false prophecies upon his Rea∣der. For though by the help and grace of God, sought onely by prayer, and by the use of means instrumental to that end, & subordinate to that grace (such are comparing Scripture with Scripture, and Prophetick expressions with the Prophetick style, and Symbols with Symbols, and the observation of the use of words and phrases in the sacred dialect) it be possible to attain to the expounding or revealing some secret senses of Scriptures, which without the uses of these means will not be attainable; yet may not the interpretations of any meer man (which hath not the gift if pro∣phecie) pretend to be the word of God. And whosoever shall professe thus to reveal the Revelation, by God speaking to him, and doth not evidence his calling and mission prophetick, especially if he pretend to have learn'd from the Revelation things so distant from what there we read, as are Germany, and France, and Britanny, of this last Century, from the Churches of Sardis, Philadelphia, and Laodic••a, in Asia, then in being when S. John by Christ's appointment wrote this prophecie to them must needs be look'd on as a false seer or false prophet. And this is done by Master Brightman in expresse words, saying, that he b 1.6 had learn'd out of the Apocaelyesp that a most heavy trial was now suddenly to invade the Christian world (as if what was said to be sudden near 1000 years since, were sufficiently fulfilled by being near at hand fourty four years ago) that the Churches of Britian, Germany, and France, were most favourably admonished of this tempest by Epistles written to them by name; that he by divine impulsion, or direction, (or what else divinitus can signifie) found these very Epistles, which signifie this thing, and from the inscriptions of them understood to whom they were sent, and durst not but dispatch them to them, left either by intercepting or concealing them he should be condemned of wrong offered to the divine Majestly. And that c 1.7 those Epistles do not foretell this by any doubt∣ful conjecture, but teach in clear words what he thus thinks fit to affix on them. The least that can be said of this is, that 'tis the adding to the prophecies of thus book, c. 22. 18. the odtruding his own fancies for Divine revelations. And if the ••ad calamities which have befaln this British