A continuation of the defence of Hvgo Grotivs, in an answer to the review of his annotations whereto is subjoyned a reply to some passages of the reviewer in his late book of schisme, concerning his charge of corruptions in the primitive church, and some other particulars
Hammond, Henry, 1605-1660.
Page [unnumbered]
ERRATA.
Pag. 3. l. 11. r. and so. p. 5. l. 33. r. bad been long expected. p. 6. l. 20. r. his letter. l. 27. r. few passages. p. 7. l. 18. r. so that 53. ibid. r. 10 this sense l. 35. r. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 l. 36. r. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 p. 8. l. 5. again, i. the. p. 9. l. 21. r. was written. p. 16. l. 7. r. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 l. 16. r. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 p. 25. l. 8 r. or as. l. 34. r. Schlusselburgius p. 32. l. 13. r. sounded. l. ult. r. on them. p 36. l. 4. r secrecie; with. p. 39. l. 8. dele to. l. 29. r. And so the p. 42. l. 16. r. symbole. l. 21. r. latent. p. 43. l. 1. r. as it is.
