Now if they paid Tythes (saith the Disputant) how were they Church-men? To this it is answered, The Teaching Pharisees paid not Tythes, But received them, but the Laick Pharisees paid it. But this distinction is not satisfactory; for if none but Laicks paid Tythes, then we may as well conclude, that all the Levites were Laicks, because the Levits paid Tythes to the Priests. I humbly conceive the answer •…•…would be sound and true thus, That it does not follow, that of absolute necessity, the Pharisees that paid Tythes must be Laicks; for why might not they, being Church-men, pay Tythes to the Priests at the Temple, as well as the Levites who receive Tythes pay the Tythe of their Tythes to the Priests, Numb. 18. 28, 29. But the Priests were Levites, and the Levites called Priests, Ezek. 44. 15. Heb. 7. 5. But we need none of these distinctions or answers to solve this question a∣bout Paul, for we do affirm (from Act. 26. 4, 5.) that Paul be∣fore his Conversion was no Tent-maker; for Paul declares be∣fore King Agrippa, that all the Jewes knew, that from his youth he had lived after the strictest Sect of Iudaism a Pharisee: now no body believes that the strictest Sect of Pharisees were Trades men, much less Tent-makers.
Likewise Act. 22. 3. proves Paul was never bound to that Trade of Tent-making, for he was brought up at the feet of Gamaliel: now all men know that Gamaliel was no Laick Phari∣see, he was no Tent-maker, but a Doctor of the Law, who taught Paul not Tent-making, but as the Text tells us, the perfect manner of the Law of the Fathers. Tertullian and Hierom affirm that he was incomparably wise in the knowledge of the Scrip∣tures.
Moreover Pauls Learning, Eloquence and practices, tell us, that he never learnt before his Conversion, nor ever practised the Trade of Tent-making; he had a far worse Trade, which hee followed too hard, to be of that; in stead of making Tents for men, he pulled down and destroyed the Tabernacles of God, the bodies of the Sainrs. Such was his humane Lear∣ning, that (saith Chrysostome) it was a great question amongst the Heathens, Whether he were not more Learned then Plato?
3. Next let us view Pauls Conversion.
This Paul, that Lion that devoured the Saints, that brier that scratched and wounded all that came neer him, or hee could