The art of rhetoric, with A discourse of the laws of England by Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury.
About this Item
Title
The art of rhetoric, with A discourse of the laws of England by Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury.
Author
Hobbes, Thomas, 1588-1679.
Publication
London :: Printed for William Crooke ...,
1681.
Rights/Permissions
To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
Subject terms
Rhetoric -- Early works to 1800.
Oratory -- Early works to 1800.
Law -- Great Britain -- History.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A43971.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The art of rhetoric, with A discourse of the laws of England by Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A43971.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 12, 2025.
Pages
CHAP. I.
That Rhetorick is an Art consisting not only
in moving the passions of the Judge; but
chiefly in Proofs. And that this Art is
Profitable.
WE see that all men naturally are
able in some sort to accuse and
excuse: Some by chance; but
some by method. This method
may be discovered: and to dis∣cover
Method is all one with
teaching an Art. If this Art consisted in Crimi∣nations
only, and the skill to stir up the Judg∣es
to Anger, Envy, Fear, Pity, or other affecti∣ons;
descriptionPage 2
a Rhetorician in well ordered Common∣wealths
and States, where it is forbidden to
digress from the cause in hearing, could
have nothing at all to say. For all these
perversions of the Judge are beside the que∣stion.
And that which the pleader is to
shew, and the Judge to give sentence on,
is this only: 'Tis so: or not so. The rest
hath been decided already by the Law-ma∣ker;
who judging of universals, and future
things, could not be corrupted. Besides,
'tis an absurd thing, for a man to make
crooked the Ruler he means to use.
It consisteth therefore chiefly in Proofs;
which are Inferences: and all Inferences be∣ing
Syllogismes, a Logician, if he would ob∣serve
the difference between a plain Syllo∣gisme,
and an Enthymeme, (which is a Rhe∣toricall
Syllogisme,) would make the best
Rhetorician. For all Syllogismes and Inferen∣ces
belong properly to Logick; whether
they infer truth or probability: and because
without this Art it would often come to
pass, that evil men by the advantage of na∣tural
abilities, would carry an evil cause a∣gainst
a good; it brings with it at least this
profit, that making the pleaders even in
skill, it leaves the odds only in the merit of
the cause. Besides, ordinarily those that
are Judges, are neither patient, nor capa∣ble
of long Scientifical proofs, drawn from
descriptionPage 3
the principles through many Syllogisms; and
therefore had need to be instructed by the
Rhetoricall, and shorter way. Lastly, it were
ridiculous, to be ashamed of being vanqui∣shed
in exercises of the body, and not to be
ashamed of being inferior in the vertue of
well expressing the mind.
email
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem?
Please contact us.