Historia quinq-articularis exarticulata, or, Animadversions on Doctor Heylin's quintquarticular history by Henry Hickman.

About this Item

Title
Historia quinq-articularis exarticulata, or, Animadversions on Doctor Heylin's quintquarticular history by Henry Hickman.
Author
Hickman, Henry, d. 1692.
Publication
London :: Printed for Robert Boulter,
1674.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Heylyn, Peter, 1600-1662. -- Historia quinquarticularis.
Church of England -- History.
London (England) -- History -- To 1500.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A43715.0001.001
Cite this Item
"Historia quinq-articularis exarticulata, or, Animadversions on Doctor Heylin's quintquarticular history by Henry Hickman." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A43715.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 3, 2024.

Pages

Page 105

Dr. H. pag. 55.

2. The Councel of Trent consisted for the most part of Italian Bishops; some others being added for fashion sake, and that it might the better challenge the name of General: as that of Dort, consisted for the most part of the Delegates of the Belgick Churches, to whom the foreign Divines were found inconsiderable.

Answ. What a wilde parallel is this? Is it equally faulty for a National Synod to consist mostly of the Delegates of the Belgick Churches, and for a Councel pretending to be Oecumenical, to consist mostly of Italian Bishops, and those many of them but titular? Far better, and with more co∣lour of reason it might be objected against our Synods, or Convocations here in England, that they consist not mostly, bu only of English Divines; not one Foreigner being ad∣mitted either to consult or to decide, nor the Puritan Non-conformists so much as invited to declare their Opinions, or to alledge any thing in their own Justification. Who ever till now found in any History, a National Synod brand∣ed and censured, because as many Foreigners were not ad∣mitted to it, as there were of that very Nation for whose sake the Synod was assembled?

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.