Page 952
A Commencement Sermon AT CAMBRIDGE.
ACTS xii. 23.And immediately the Angel of the Lord smote him; because he gave not God the glory, and he was eaten of worms, and gave up the Ghost.
IF the Caesarea was so attentive to hear King Herods Eloquence, and how he did exalt himself above God: What is your alacrity, may I presume (Dearly Beloved) to give ear to this story and to Gods vengeance how he did exalt himself above Herod? It might be suspected that Caesarea the Region which was called by the name of Caesar, would be chiefly for the honour of the King, but now we are in the house of the Lord, and in his Temple doth every man speak of his honour, says the Prophet David. St. Luke hath occasioned the mention of two Angels in this Chapter, and they are both strikers. The first Angel is in the seventh verse, that smote St. Peter on the side, and rouzed him up from sleep; I wish that a good Spirit sent from God may now stir up your attentions. The second Angel is in my Text, that smote King Herod in the inward bowels: and believe it, such as was the sin of Herod, a presumptuous speaker, such is the sin of every carless and unprofitable hearer, that serves the vanity of his own imaginations in this holy place, and gives not God the glory. Is the Lord asleep think you because ye are drowzie? Are not his Angels heedful of their charge be∣cause your thoughts are wandring? Are you sure to come often to Church hereafter if you leave your affections at home to day? Nay, but though the present business be confined to an hour, so is not the vengeance of the Lord; for immediately the Angel smote him, because he gave not God the glory.
Every religious exercise should be too long by a Preface, I come therefore to set the Text in order, that I may proceed to the explication of the parts, and they are two: First, That Herod would not glorifie God, indeed that is the bitter root out of which grew all these worms, he gave not God the glory. Secondly, That God was glo∣rified in Herod, he was smitten of an Angel, eaten of Vermine, and gave up the Ghost.* 1.1 Herod, says St. Chrysostom, gave not God the glory two ways: 1. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉. his mouth spake proud things before the people. 2. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, he suffered the people to speak proud things as if he were equal with God, and did not rebuke them. Wherefore God was glorified in Herod four ways: 1. That tantus pe∣riit, the Ruler, the Prince of the people, he was smitten. 2. A tanto periit, no less than a mighty Angel smote him. 3. Tantus tam repentè, immediately he was smitten. 4. Tantus tam luctuosè, he was eaten of worms, and gave up the Ghost. Did not the Lord shew great glory in plucking down the mighty? He was smitten. Is not his arm ex∣alted, when the Angels are his Ministers? An Angel smote him. Shall not his wrath be terrible when it consumes in the twinkling of an eye? Immediately he was smitten. Lastly, How weak is man in his sight, even as a bulrush in the field? All the beasts are his Army, and the vilest creatures, if he send them forth, are strong