Page 249
CHAP. XXXIII. Tartar is not in drink. (Book 33)
1. Some suppositions proved before. 2. That Tartarers are not in things constituted. 3. Three Monarchies of things, whence a threefold stone. 4. It far differs from the Tartar of Wine. 5. The Stone in man is made from errour, but not from the intention of Nature. 6. An Argument from the like, is not of value. 7. Some Arguments taking away Tartar out of drink. 8. An opposite Argument. 9. The rash∣ness or heedlesness of the Schools. 10. Two Histories. 11. The boast∣ings of Paracelsus. 12. The swellings in the neck or Kings-Evill, are not from Tartar. 13. Wine is innocent of humane Tartar. 14. Whe∣ther stony or Rockie waters do contain Tartar. 15. Whence there are Strumaes or swellings in mans neck, and not in that of Bruits. 16. A Remedy against those swellings. 17. A Remedy against Scirrus's, and swelling pimples in the face. 18. A preoccupation or prevention. 19. A distinction by a Maxim.
VVHatsoever Arguments do take away Tartar out of Meats, are like premises in this place: But seeing waters do immediately wax stony, the proposition is to be [unspec 1] confirmed by a stronger Engine. In the first place, I have taught, that every Stone is imme∣diately the Son of water, but not of Tartar: And then, that the concretion or growing to∣gether of every Body is from the Seed, but not from the Law of Tartar. Thirdly, that the concretion appointed by the Seed, is from the integrity of nature, and so from the gift of Creation; but not from Tartar, which according to Paracelsus, is nothing but the excrement of a thing.
But a natural product is of its Mother matter, but not of a step-mother; and moreover of a seminal or efficient beginning, in which, all the figures, Idea's, and knowledges of things to [unspec 2] be done, are. At length, the Types or figures of Tartars are not in things by Creation, fra∣med for our destruction, as neither a Medicine of destruction in the Earth: what therefore doth it make to the introducing of the nature of Tartat into Diseases, that a stone is the fruit of water, if the condition of Tartar be not in a stone? Or that Tartar is the fruit of Wine, if there be no such thing in other things? For what doth it prejudice nature, if the phantasie deluding a Stone external, or the Stone internal with a name, shall call it Tartar? And he weakly enough, and without proof affirmeth, that Stones, and every solid Body do mutually agree with Tartar of Wine in every property? For truly that his own assertion is free, without truth and probability: For the Stone in us is generated by another seed, mean, and progress, than Tartar out of Wine, or a Stone out of water, are: To wit, there are three Monarchies of Bodies in the Universe; the Animal, Vegetable, and [unspec 3] Mineral: therefore there is a threefold Stone, and that distinct in the whole Monarchy: For a Mineral Stone differs from the Case of the Kernel of Medlers, Peachies, &c. and both these again from the Stone of Crabs, Bezoar, Snall-shels, Fish-stones, the Stone of Man, &c.
Again, those three Stones do also far differ from the Tartar of Wine, which is not to be reckoned among Stones, seeing it is the concreted Liquor of a Salt: For a Mineral is ei∣ther [unspec 4] a Rockie Stone, which may be turned into Lime; or a small Stone, which is not calcined, as Gems, Marbles, Flints: But both are now concluded in one onely name of Petra or a Rock: But a Vegetable Stone, seeing it is burnable, as the Jeat or Agath, otherwise also, Mineral Sulphurous Stones, it is rather a knotty Wood, than a Rockie Stone: But an Animal Stone is rather a stony bone (because it is partly burnt) than a Rockie Stone. Also for distinction of the stone of man from other stones, that is by Paracelsus called Duelech: Because rockie stones, as well the mineral as vegetable ones, are fruits, natural, necessary, and of the first in∣tention in creating: But Duelech is onely a Disease, and like to a monster: But in other en∣li••ened Creatures, the stone hath obtained a profitable appointment.