Page 949
CHAP. IV. Phlebotomy or Bloud-letting in Fevers, is examined.
1. One onely reason against humours, others elsewhere. 2. A universal proposition for Bloud-letting, Galen being the Author. 3. A Syllogisme against the same Galen. 4. A Logistical or rational proof. 5. That a Plethora or abounding fulnesse of good bloud, is impossible. 6. That corrupted bloud doth never sub∣sist in the veines. 7. That there cannot be said to be a Plethora, in a neutral state of the bloud. 8. That cutting of a vein is never betokened by the Positions of the Schooles. 9. What a Cachochymia or state of bad juyce in the veines may properly be. 10. That co-indications instead of a proper indication, and those opposite to a contrary indication or betokening, do square amisse. 11. A proposition of the Author against cutting of a veine in a Fever. 12. The Schooles disgrace their own laxative Medicines, by their tryals of the cutting of a veine. 13. The ends of co-betokenings. 14. A fore-warning of the Author. 15. After what man∣ner, the letting out of bloud cooleth. 16. A miserable History of a Cardinal In∣fanto. 17. We must take special notice against Physitians that are greedy of bloud. 18. A guilty mind, is a thousand witnesses. 19. An argument drawn from thence. 20. The essential state of Fevers. 21. An explaining of the foregoing argument, concerning cooling, and the privy shifts of the Schooles. 22. That there is not a pro∣ceeding from one extream unto another, is badly drawn from Science Mathematical into Medicine. 23. It is a faulty argument in healing. 24. The argument from the position of the Schooles is opposed. 25. The false paint of the Schooles, from stub∣born ignorance. 26. The faculties obtain the chiefdom of betokening. 27. Hippo∣crates, concerning great Wrestlers or Champions, is opposed: but being badly un∣derstood. 28. The differences of emptyings. 29. A Fever hurts lesse than the cut∣ting of a veine. 30. The obligement of Physitians. 31. A general intention in Fe∣vers, and the cutting of a veine opposite thereunto. 32. Science Mathematical proveth, that cutting of a veine, doth alwayes hurt. 33. The uncertainty of Physi∣tians proves a defect of Principles. 34. Cutting of a veine cannot diminish the cause of Fevers. 35. An argument from a sufficient enumeration: 36. Another from the quality of the bloud. 37. Whither the Schooles are driven. 38. Vain hope in the changes of bloud let out. 39. That the co-indication of Phlebotomy for Revulsion, is vain, as well in a Fever, as in the menstrues. 40. Derivation in local Diseases is sometimes profitable: but in Fevers impertinent. 41. Cutting of a vein is hurtfull in a Pleurisie. 42. The Schooles may learn from the Country Folk, that their Maximes are false. 43. Revulsion a Rule in Fevers. 44. What Physitians ought to learn by this Chapter.
BEfore I proceed unto further Scopes, I ought to repeat what things I have elsewhere demonstrated in a large Treatise: To wit, That there are not two Cholers, and phlegme in Nature, as the constitutive parts of the venal blood; but that the Treatise of Fevers required me to be more brief: especially, because those very things do of themselves go to ruine in this place; where there is no mention made of Humours, ex∣cept putrified ones, since an Animal or living Creature that is putrified, is no longer an Animal.
I will therefore examine onely the two universal Succours: To wit, Bloud-letting and [unspec 1] Purging, as the two pillars of Medicine; and the which being dashed in pieces, the whole Edifice falls down of its own accord, as it were into Rubbish: and these Suc∣cours being taken away, Physitians may forsake the sick, they not having Remedies, besides the Diminishers of the body and strength; all which I will peculiarly touch at.
For indeed according to the consent of Galen, in every Fever (a Hectick one except∣ed) [unspec 2] cutting of a vein is required. Therefore for the Schooles, and custome of this destru∣ctive Age, I state this Syllogisme.