They confesse in the next place, that the Conditions of being, living, and feeling or perceiving in Man, differ in their whole Condition from an Animal Nature, because it follows the Faculty of the rational Form or Immortal mind: But they shamefully believe, that a Man aswel of the first Constitution, as being now Divinely Regenerated by the Sa∣craments, is an Essential Animal.
Fie, let it shame man not to know that the Evil Spirit, and whole Nature also, are not able by any means, or any way to change the Essence given unto him from the fore∣knowledge of the Creator, but that he should continually remain such as he was created; although in the mean time, he hath cloathed himself with strange properties, as Natural unto him from the vice of his own will: For as it wants not an absurdity, to reckonman glorified, among Animals, because he is not without a sense or feeling; So, to be sensitive doth not shew the unseperable Essence of an Animal.
And seeing otherwise, the definition of every thing is from the Essence of the thing (as they will have it) but man according to his Essence, was made in a full possession of Immortality, and henceforth of an Eternal Duration, according to his Soul; the Schools could not believe, that man, by reason of a sensitive Soul alone, was essentially an Ani∣mal; Especially while they believed his Essence to depend on an Eternal Duration, and an uncorruptible Soul or Form.
All which absurdities, I acknowledge to have crept into, and to have remained in the Schools, by reason of the truth of our Position being unknown.
Even hitherto, I have established the Position out of the holy Scriptures. Now again the same, by the Authorities of Fathers; which matter B. Augustine hath seemed to have [unspec 76] understood before others; saying,
After what manner had it shamed Man of the Transgression of a Law, when as his very Members had not known shame?
As if he should say, His Members were stirred up unto the Concupiscence of the Flesh, and acts of his Privie Parts, presently after the Eating of the Apple. Their Eyes were opened; but for this they were not opened, that they might know, what might be performed by them, through the cloathing of Grace, when as their Members knew not how to resist their will.
And dost thou not blush at that Disease, or that thou, although shamefac'd, dost confess, that that Lust entred into Paradise? And to impute it unto Husbands and Wives before Sin?
He who was to be without Sin, would be born without the Concupiscence of the Flesh, not in that Flesh of Sin; but in the likeness of sinful Flesh: As if he should say, whatsoever is born from Copulation, although it had been born in Paradise and before Sin, would have been, and is the Flesh of Sin; Seeing that alone, which is not born of Copulation, is not the Flesh of Sin.
Whatsoever off-spring is born from Concupiscence, or of the Flesh of Sin, is obliged unto Orignal Sin, unless it be born again in him, whom the Virgin conceived without Concupi∣scence.
The Flesh of Christ drew a mortality from the mortality of his Mothers Body; because she found not the Concupiscence of a Copulatresse.
For indeed, as Original Sin is not derived on the Posterity any other way, than by the Con∣cupiscence of the Flesh; So it must needs be, that in the Apple was included the Concupiscence, from whence the humane stock degenerated, and was vitiated in generating: For truly if off∣springs could have been generated any otherwise than by carnal Copulation, the Matrimonial act had been unlawful.
Whereunto this every-way convincing Argument; serveth,
That act, before the Apple was eaten, was either unlawful, and not thought of; or it was [unspec 77] lawful.
If it were unlawful, now our Position is proved. But if lawful, therefore whatsoever I have above described out of Augustine, is false.
Seeing therefore they had now actually felt the effect of the eaten Apple, or the Con∣cupiscence of the Flesh in their Members in Paradise, presently it shamed them, because their Members, which before they could rule at their pleasure, were afterwards moved by a proper incentive of lust.
At length, how greatly Virginity hath alwayes pleased the Bridegroom of the Soul, doth clearly enough appear out of divers Histories of the Saints.
And indeed, in Cana of Galilee, the Bridegroom having left his Bride, followed the Lord Jesus, and it is that Disciple whom Jesus therefore so greatly loved.
The same thing was familiar unto Alexius, Aegidius, and to very many others, especi∣ally with poor Women-Virgins.