Archelogia philosophica nova, or, New principles of philosophy containing philosophy in general, metaphysicks or ontology, dynamilogy or a discourse of power, religio philosophi or natural theology, physicks or natural philosophy / by Gideon Harvey ...
About this Item
Title
Archelogia philosophica nova, or, New principles of philosophy containing philosophy in general, metaphysicks or ontology, dynamilogy or a discourse of power, religio philosophi or natural theology, physicks or natural philosophy / by Gideon Harvey ...
Author
Harvey, Gideon, 1640?-1700?
Publication
London :: Printed by J. H. for Samuel Thomson ...,
1663.
Rights/Permissions
To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
Subject terms
Philosophy.
Natural theology -- Early works to 1800.
Science -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A43008.0001.001
Cite this Item
"Archelogia philosophica nova, or, New principles of philosophy containing philosophy in general, metaphysicks or ontology, dynamilogy or a discourse of power, religio philosophi or natural theology, physicks or natural philosophy / by Gideon Harvey ..." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A43008.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 23, 2025.
Pages
CHAP. III. Of the Principles of a Natural Being.
1. That Privation is no Principle of a Physical Generation, or of a Phy∣sical Being. That Union might be more properly termed a Principle, than Privation. p. 8.
2. The Principles of a Material Be∣ing stated by Pythagoras reje∣cted. p. 9.
3. That to treat of Matter and Form is more proper to Metaphysicks. 10.
4. That the Materia Prima of Ari∣stotle is a Non Ens. ib.
5. That the Chaos had a Form. p. 11.
6. The Authors Materia Prima. p. 12.
7. That it doth not appertain to Phy∣sicks to explain the nature of the first Matter. ib.
8. What the first Form of all natural Beings is. ib. 13.
email
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem?
Please contact us.