Page 452
CHAP. X.
* 1.1THus we see every party or side, however it justifie or magnifie it selfe, yet it falls under either the blame or jealousie of its rivals, as defective or ex∣cessive; yet not so much in the fundamentals of Re∣ligion, or main points, either for Doctrine, Worship, Duty, or Manners, as chiefly in matters of Ordination, Discipline, and Government: Nor is the difference here so broad, that any side denies them as necessary both in the parts and whole, in greater and lesser proportions, for the Church of Christ; but the reall dispute is, who shall mannage and execute them, in whom the chief power and Authority shall reside, whether eminently in Bishops, or solely in Pres∣byters, or supremely in the people, as the Alpha and Omega, the first recipient and the last result of Church-power.
All sides (except Fanaticks, Seekers, and Enthusiasts) seem to agree, as in the Canon of the Scripture, so in the soundnesse of the faith, in the sanctity of divine mysteries, in the celebration of them by such as are some way ordained and authorised for that holy ser∣vice; also in the participation of them by such onely as are in the judgement of Charity worthy or meet to be partakers of them. All agree in the main Christian graces, virtues, and morals required in a good Christians practise; yet still each party is suspected and reproched by others: the brisk Independent boasts of the Liberty, sim∣plicity, and purity of his way, yet is blamed for Novelty, Subtilty, Vulgarity & Anarchy; the rigid Presbyterian glories in his Aristocra∣tick Parity and levelling community, which makes every petty Pres∣byter a Pope and a Prince, though he disdain to be a Priest, yet is tax∣ed for petulancy, popularity, arrogancy and novelty, casting off that Catholick and ancient order, which God and Nature, Reason and Re∣ligion, all civill and military policy, both require and observe a∣mong all societies.
Episcopacy justly challengeth the advantages, right and honor of Apostolick and Primitive Antiquity, of universality and unity, be∣yond any pretenders; yet is this condemned by some for undue in∣crochments and oppressions upon both Ministers and peoples inge∣nuous Liberty, and Christian priviledge, by a kind of secular height and arbitrary soveraignty, to which many Bishops in after-ages have been betrayed, as by their own pride and ambition, so by the indul∣gence of times, the munificence of Christian Princes, and sometimes by the flatteries of people.
Take away the popular principle of the first, which prostrates Go∣vernment to the vulgar; Take away the levelling ambition of the second, which degrades Government to a very preposterous and unproportionate parity; Take away the monopoly of the third, which seems to ingrosse to one man more than is meet for the whole: each of them will be sufficiently purged (as I conceive) of what is