Page 355
CHAP. XXVII.
IT was a speech in old times of better significancy than sound, Luxus Clericorum Laus est Laicorum,* 1.1 The Splendour or Pomp of the Clergy was the Praise and Honour of the Laity: not that Church-men should at any time be rio∣tous and luxurious in their greatest abundance; but it is the com∣mendation of Christian people (as indeed of all men) so to entertain the Ministers of their God, and Dispensers of their Religion (special∣ly in times of peace and a Land of plenty) as may set them and their Profession furthest off from Poverty, and its inseparable companion, vulgar contempt; that Church-men might have, not onely wherewith to keep up the outward Decency & Majesty of Religion, but to maintain themselves and their families, at such a proportion as may extend to charity, liberality and hospitality. The habits and exercises of which vertues become no mens Hearts, Hands and Houses, better than Christian Ministers and Rulers of the Church: nothing more confir∣ming the Doctrine they teach of Gods munificence to mankind, than their living so, as to be ever giving; Religion is never so acceptable to common people, as when they not onely hear the Word and see the Ceremony, but taste the sweetnesse and substance of it in the reall fruits of its bounty.
Which pious Policy and charitable Craft in former dayes kept up the credit of Religion, both while it was Roman and when it was Re∣formed, to as high a pitch in England, as in any Nation under Hea∣ven; while the Clergy enjoyed those blessings of Gods and mans Donation, which enabled many an one of them to build and endow many such noble foundations of Churches, Colledges, Hospitals, and Almes-houses, that any one of them now goes beyond all that ever sacrilegious spirits did or designed, either for Gods honour or mans benefit, if all their good works and thoughts were summed up and put together, (though indeed those men are uncapable of doing any good work, as to Charity, who are guilty of sacred Robbery; stoln Sacrifices were not to be consecrated to God,* 1.2 no more than dead car∣kases.) Every History of England shews at large what good and great works Bishops and other Church-men in England did, not onely in their Papal Celebacy, but in their Primitive and later Conjugacy; fruits indeed of pious and Princely Magnificence; such as now nei∣ther the joint abilities of the indigent and peeled Clergy, nor the gripple charity of whole Counties can or will so much as keep up or repair; no not so much as to the very fabrick of those fair Churches, which were the honour of Cities, Counties, and the whole Na∣tion.
Whose vast Revenues being taken away both from Churches and Church-men, no wonder if the sordid vastations of them and their deplorable decayes, as that of S. Pauls in London, and of Ely-Min∣ster