Our English makes a little difference in translating the Hebrew, and the Greek; For that they turn the Hebrew, I will be his Father, and he shall be my Sonne: which is in effect the same, His Father and a Father to him, His Son and a Son to him, are all one in sense. The two originall Languages do directly answer one another.
In the repetition of this promise, (1 Chron. 32. 10.) the order is inverted; for it is thus set down, He shall be my Sonne, and I will be his Father: This inversion of words no whit at all altereth the sense, but affordeth unto us this observable Instruction, that The Father was not before the Sonne, nor the Sonne before the Father, nor in time, nor in order, Both coeternall, both equall; The Glory equall, the Majesty coeternall, as it is in Athanasius his Creed: Therefore in one place the Father is first set down, in another the Sonne; For the Sonne was alwaies with the Father and alwaies in the Father; With the Father, by an inseparable distincti∣on of the eternall Trinity; In the Father, by a divine unity of nature. This is fur∣ther manifest by a distinct expression of both the relatives; For he contents not himself to say, I will be a father to him, but he addes, He shall be a Son to me, to shew, that the Father never was without the Sonne.
The fore-mentioned promise as it is a promise, hath immediate relation to the Son of David, even to Solomon by name, 1 Chron. 22. 9. and thereupon this threat∣ning (if he commit iniquity I will chasten him,) is added, 2 Sam. 7. 14. for Christ was not subject to sin.
There be that say that Solomon in his sinnes might be a type of Christ, as Christ is an head of a body, and considered with the body (as Mat. 25. 40. Act. 9. 4. 1 Cor. 12. 12.) and so this threatning, If he commit iniquity, I will chasten him, ap∣plied to Christ: Or else as Christ was our Surety, and took our sinnes upon him, and was chastened for them.
But it is not necessary that all things which were in such persons as were types of Christ, should be applied to Christ. Nor Solomon, nor David, nor Aaron, as sinners in regard of their sinnes were types of Christ; Though he was in all points tempt∣ed like as we are, yet without sin. cha. 4. 14. No kinde of Persons were more proper types of Christ then the High-Priests, yet were they not types in all things that ap∣pertained to them; They were of the Tribe of Levi; They offered Sacrifices for their own sinnes; They oft renewed their Sacrifices; They had Successors when they died: In none of these were they types of Christ. See Ch. ver. 5. §. 12.
But the excellent prerogatives heaped up together, have not relation to Solomon alone. The Prerogatives as they are propounded to David in the Name of the Lord, are these in order.
- 1. I will set up thy seed after thee, which shall succeed out of thy bowels: 2 Sam. 7. 12.
- 2. I will establish his Kingdom, Ibid.
- 3. He shall build a House for my Name, 2 Sam. 7. 13.
- 4. I will establish the Throne of his Kingdom for ever, Ibid.
- 5. I will be his Father, and he shall be my Sonne, 2 Sam. 7. 14.
- 6. I will settle him in my House, and in my Kingdom for ever, 1 Chr. 17. 14.
- 7. He shall be a man of rest, and I will give him rest from all his enemies, &c. 1 Chro. 22. 9.
These, at least most of them were literally meant of him, who by name is expressed Solomon; Yet not singly and simply considered in himself alone, but as a type of Christ: For David and his posterity had their royall dignity conferred upon them, not so much for their own sakes, as that they might be a fore-going type, and a visible representation of Christs royall dignity, and of that redemption and sal∣vation which he should bring to the people of God: So as those excellencies which in the Letter are spoken of David, Solomon, and others, are mystically, truly, and principally foretold of Christ, whereby the benefit of those promises was infinite∣ly encreased, and the comfort of true beleevers above measure enlarged: This the Apostles, who were inspired with a divine Spirit, well knew: and thereupon on all occasions applied those types to their intended truth; as here in this place.
True it is, that Davids Sonne by Bathsheba, was named Solomon; but the my∣sticall truth of this name (as of the name of Melchisedech. chap. 7. v. 7.) was mani∣fested