§. 44. Of offering sacrifice for errors.
THe blood which the Priests carried into the most holy place was that which he 〈◊〉〈◊〉. Of the Priests offering to God. See Chap. 5. v. 1. §. 6.
The persons for whom he offered, are first said to be for himself. Of a Priests offering for himself. See Chap. 5. v. 3. §. 14.
It is further added, that he offered for the errours of the people: so as he offered 〈◊〉〈◊〉 only for himself, but also for others. For an high high Priest was for men, 〈◊〉〈◊〉 for other men, as hath been shewed, Chap. 5. v. 1. §. 4. Of this word people. See Chap. 4. v. 9. §. 57.
Thus it is also said of the true great high Priest Jesus Christ, that he made recon∣ciliation for the sins of the people. Hereof see Chap. 2. v. 18. §. 181.
The word here translated a 1.1 errour is a noun derived from the same verb that the participle is, which is translated b 1.2 the ignorant, Chap. 5. v. 2. §. 10.
The Apostle useth this word not to extenuate their sin, or to restrain the high Priests offering to lesser sins, even such as are extenuated with ignorance of mind, or errour of judgement; but to shew that not onely for great and hainous sins, but al∣so for the lesser kind of sins, offerings were made. Besides, this phrase may fitly be used of all manner of sins; because there is an errour of judgement in every one. When the Apostle spake of the very same thing which here he doth, he useth c 1.3 a word that signifieth all manner of sins, Heb. 7. 27. d 1.4 The Hebrew word, whereun∣to, that which the Apostle here useth, doth answer, signifieth errours: yet is it also put for all manner of sin. And in the law whereunto this of the Apostle hath relati∣on, indefinite words, which signifie all manner of sins, are used. The like is implyed by those general phrases, all their iniquities, all their transgressions, all their sins (Lev. 16. 21.)
I will not deny, but that this phrase may also be used in opposition to such wil∣full,* 1.5 obstinate, and presumptuous sins, as caused the committers of them to be ut∣terly cut off. For such an opposition is made, Numb. 15. 22, 27, 30. And by that opposition it is implyed, that the Priest was not to offer Sacrifice for such.
Quest. Was that sin then the sin against the holy Ghost?* 1.6
Answ. Though the presumption there meant, were a most heynous sin, yet have we not sufficient ground to imagin it to be the sin against the Holy Ghost?
Five things are alledged to prove it to be the sin against the Holy Ghost.
- 1. That it was committed with an high hand, Numb. 15. 30.
- 2. That no Sacrifice was to be offered for it.
- 3. That the committers thereof were utterly to be cut off.
- 4. That the iniquitie of him that committed it should be upon him, Numb. 15. 31.
- 5. That the Apostle resembleth the sin against the Holy Ghost to that sin, Heb. 10. •…•…, 29.
Answ. To the first. A man might sin presumptuously with an high hand, and yet r•…•…pent and find mercy. Instance Manasseth, 2 Chro. 33. 13. But so cannot he that 〈◊〉〈◊〉 against the Holy Ghost.
To the second. The deniall of the benefit of a Sacrifice, doth not prove the sin to