- ...
- 3. Of such things as are not meet or fit to be known: in this respect Christ saith to his Disciples, It is not for you to know the times or the seasons which the Fa∣ther hath put in his own power, Act. 1. 7.
- 2. Relatively, men are said not to know, in reference to such knowledge as they might or should have. This is properly called Ignorance.
Ignorance is a privation of knowledge.
Now a privation presupposeth a contrary habit of that which one hath had, or is capable of having. As blindnesse presupposeth sight in him that is blinde; or at least such a subject as was capable of sight. A man that never had sight may be said to be blinde, (Iohn 9. 1.) because he was capable of sight.
Ignorance thus properly taken is simple or wilfull.
Simple ignorance is in two cases.
- 1. When means are not afforded to know what we ought to know. In this respect the Apostle saith of the times wherein the Gentiles wanted means of knowledge, The times of this ignorance God winked at, Act. 17▪ 30▪ This kinde of ignorance is sinfull; and that because God at first gave man ability to know whatsoever was meet for him to know. That men after Adams fall knew not their duty, it was their own fault.
- 2. When means afforded are too slightly used to finde out the true case of a thing. The ignorance which Abimelech had about Sarah to be the wife of A∣braham, was a simple ignorance, because he was deceived by Abrahams speech, (Gen. 20. 5.) yet was it sinfull, in that it was possible for him to have found out the truth of that case, if he had used his utmost endeavour.
Simple ignorance in both the forementioned cases may be either of the Law or of a fact.
The former is the more general, and the more blameable. We say of the Laws of a Land, that every one should know the Law: and that ignorance thereof excuseth no Subject that liveth under that Law. Much more are all bound to know the Law of God: because that Law was first written in mans heart, Rom. 2. 15. Christ saith of the servant that knew not his Masters will, and did commit things contrary thereunto, that he shall be beaten. A Masters will made known, is a Law to his servant; Though one particular servant know it not, yet is he not excused thereby from blame and punishment, Luk. 12. 48.
The later, which is ignorance of a fact, is more special respecting some parti∣cular branches of the Law. As Pauls persecuting Christians. He knew that blasphemy, persecution and oppression in general were sins against the Law: so that there was not ignorance of the Law in him. But to blaspheme the name of Christ, to persecute and oppresse Christians, which were particular facts, he knew not to be sin, for he saith, I verily thought with my self, that I ought to do many things contrary to the name of Iesus, Act. 26. 9. So as this was ignorance of such and such facts. Christ saith in the like case, They which kill you will think they do God service, Joh. •…•…6. 2.
Simple ignorance in the severall kindes thereof may extenuate sinne, Luke 12. 48.
Wilfull ignorance is in two other cases:
- 1. When means afforded for knowledge are neglected: as the Israelius who enquired not at the Ark, which they had among them, in the dayes of Saul (1 Chron. 13. 3.) too much neglected the means which God afforded, of know∣ing his will. In this respect, the sins which they committed upon ignorance of Gods will, were sins of wilfull ignorance.
- 2. When means afforded are rejected. This is it which Christ thus layeth to the charge of the Jews, How often would I have gathered thy children together, and ye would not, Mat. 23. 37.
In these respects, ignorance may be said to be voluntary:
- 1. Indirectly: when one by reason of pains, or other imployments neglecteth to learn that which might restrain him from sinne. To this tends that reason which Ieroboam rendred to keep the Israelites from going up to the Temple, to