yet it is certain, there were great numbers of them never returned, but continued in Babylon, where they had 3. famous Scholes, or Ʋni∣versities, Sora, Pompeditha, and Neharda (as has been afore observed) which we cannot conceive, that Pythagoras, so curious an Inquisitor in∣to Antiquity, would passe by, without observation for 12. years space, for so long he continued in Babylon, according to Iamblichus. That, which gave Pythagoras the greatest advantage, and encourage∣ment to converse with the Jews in Babylon, was his skill in the Egyp∣tian Tongue (as Diogenes, and others assert) which indeed differed not in Substance, but only in Dialect, from the Hebrew, and Chaldee, as we have endeavored to prove out of Bochart, and others; so that we need not, with Aristobulus, suppose the Translation of Moses's books into Greek before the Persian Monarchie; for Pythagoras being skilled in the Egyptian, and, I suppose, also the Chaldean Tongue, having lived in Chaldea 12. years, might without difficulty, read Moses's Writings, at least have conversation, and conference with the Jews, who could, without doubt, (having lived so long in Chaldea) speake the Chaldean Tongue, &c. That Pythagoras really had conversation with the Jews at Babylon, and translated many things out of their Doctrines into his Philosophie, has been already proved by sundry Testimonies collected by Learned Ʋsher, as also by the concession of Stillingfleet; of which see §. 2. of this Chapter.
§. 9. Pythagoras having spent 12. years at Babylon, in conversa∣tion with the Persian Magi, Chaldeans, and Jews, about the 56 year of his age he returned to Samos, where hee endeavored to instruct the Samians in that Symbolick mode of philosophizing, he had learned in Egypt, and other oriental parts, but the Samians, not affecting his ob∣scure, and enigmatick Philosophie, did not give him any great encourage∣ment to continue long with them, as Iamblichus de vita Pythag. l. 1. c. 5. Laertius informes us, that the occasion of his departure from Sames, was the Tyranny it lay under by reason of Polycrates his usurpation. So Vossius de phil. sect. l. 2. c. 6. §. 1. That Pythagoras was a great asser∣tor of the peoples Liberties (as Plato) but an inveterate enemy of Ty∣ranny, will appear in its place.
§. 10. Iamblichus also (cap. 5.) acquaints us, that, before his go∣ing into Italy, he went to Crete to acquaint himself with the Laws of Minois, as also to Sparta, to gain Knowledge in those of Lycurgus, which then had the Vogue for great Legislators. Laertius tels us,