First Question.
This being, (as I may say) the first day of Judgment, when God in the text legally proceeded to the sentencing of Adam (cast by the confession of his own conscience) how cometh it to pass that only Temporal punishment is inflicted upon him. One might justly have expected, that God rather would have said, from Hell came thy sin, and to Hell let thy sin return, and thy soul go a long with is. Or you shall go from the place wherein you stand, to the place of eternal Damnation, where the worm dyeth not, and the fire is not quenched, there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth. Whereas now the mention only of Temporal death, hath given the hint to Prophane persons in this licentious age (greedy to snatch at all shaddows of advantage) no less boldly then falsly to maintain, that sin in its own nature, doth only diserve, and shall only receive Temporal Death.
I answer, first Negatively, It was not because sin in its own nature, deserveth only Temporal Death seeing, (were it the work of the day, and the time as proper as the place for that purpose) Legions of Scriptures, might be produed to prove that et ernal (as well as temporal) death is due to the demerit of sin, yet none can wonder at prophane persons, if willing to kindle comfort to themselves at every Gloworm they meet with, it being for the intrest of thieves and murderers to be∣lieve (if they can so perswade themselves) that there never will be Goales, Judge, Sizes, Sessions, Sheriffs, or Executioners. But for most weighty reasons, Obvius and open to our apprehension, (besides others no doubt concealed in his own bo∣some) Divine wisdome adjudged it not convenient to besentence our first Parents with eternal Damnation, though according to his justice and their deserts, it might have been inflicted upon them.
First ingeneral I answer, Why should any mans eye be evil because Gods is good? What if he were pleased to abate of legal extremity, and mercifully to remit much thereof who shall say unto him, why dost thou so? Indeed Itinerant Judges bound to observe the letter of the Law, may not, but a King by his Prerogative may