It was Testified (saith he) that I came thither in a Pompous manner. I deny it, it was only in a grave and seemly manner. It is objected, that as soon as I came within the Church door I fell down upon my Knees; True, It was no more than my Du∣ty, being an Oratory. Moses and Aaron fell down on their Knees at the Door of the Tabernacle. He∣zekiah and the People Bowed and Worshipped, as I have proved at large in my Speech in the Star-Cham∣ber. And, O come let us Worship and fall down be∣fore the Lord our Maker, is the common Introitus in our own and other Liturgies. It is objected, I pro∣nounced the Place and Ground Holy, I did so, and it is an ordinary and legal Speech, there being a Re∣lative, though not an Inherent Holiness in Churches dedicated to God's Service. Whereas it was said, I threw up dust in the Air, This I deny, and where it was alledged that this was an Imitation of the Roman Pontifical; that (said he) is a mistake: for the Pontifical Preseribes, (Cinis) Ashes, not Dust to be cast abroad. For my Form of Consecrati∣on, Bishop Andrews made it, from whom I de∣sired a Copy, and had it, which I observed. It was objected that the form of Prayer I used, is in the Mass-Book and Roman Pontifical. It may be so, he replied, and many other very good Prayers are in it.
After the Bishop had made his Defence, a Reply was made by a Member of the House of Commons, appointed to manage the Evi∣dence.
1. That Moses had an express Command from God himself to Consecrate the Tabernacle, with all the Vessels thereof, by Anointing them with Consecrated Oyl, Exod. 40. 10, 11, 12. they be∣ing Types of Christ to come: But we have no such Command from God to Consecrate Church∣es, Church-Yards, Chappels, Altars, Vestments, which are no Types of Christ already come.
2. This Consecration was made by Moses the Temporal Magistrate, (not by Aaron the High-Priest) without any other Ceremony than meer Anointing the Tabernacle and its Vessels and Implements with Oyl; therefore this was no Warrant for Bishop's Consecrating Church∣es, Church-Yards, Chappels, Altars, Vestments, with other Ceremonies, without any Anointing them with Oyl.
3. This Consecration was only Temporary, Jew∣ish, Ceremonial, abolished by Christ's death, Col. 2. 14. &c.
4. King Solomon did not Consecrate the Temple, nor the Vessels and Court thereof with Oyl, as Moses did the Tabernacle, but after he had brought the Ark, Tabernacle, and all the Holy Vessels into it, with Praises, Thanksgiving and Instruments of Musick, and after the Cloud and Glory of the Lord had filled the House, he made an Heavenly Prayer only in the midst of the Court, not in the Temple, before all the Congregation of Isra∣el.
1. That the most Holy Place was so stiled, though never Consecrated: So Jerusalem is very frequently called the Holy City, Matt. 4, 5. and 27. 53. though never Consecrated, and God told Moses, The place whereon thou standeth is Holy Ground, Exod. 3. 5. though never Consecrated by a Bishop.
2. Our own Homilies inform us, That the Church is counted and called Holy, not of it self, (nor yet for its Consecration by a Bishop) but because God's People resorting thither, are Holy, and exercise themselves in Holy and Heavenly things.
3. The Hearing and Preaching God's Word, Prayer and receiving the Sacraments therein, are sufficient of themselves to sanctifie, and make it Holy without any other Consecration.
4. Sanctification in its own nature, is nothing else but a sequestring of any thing from a com∣mon or ordinary use, to a Religious and Sacred purpose, and this may be done without a Bi∣shop's Exorcism or Conjuration.
For his throwing up of Dust, two Witnes∣ses expresly depose it, which must over-ballance his bare Negotiation, and there is so little dif∣ference between Dust and Ashes, as they are u∣sually coupled together as Synonymous in Scrip∣ture and Authors. That he took his Form from Bishop Andrews, is only averred by himself, not proved by any Witness; but that it agrees with that in the Pontifical, which we found in his Study even in terminis, is most clear, and therefore we cannot but presume he derived it from thence: However if Bishop Andrews imitated the Pontifical, and he Bishop Andrews, the Charge is much alike.
An Information being Exhibited in the Kings Bench against Sir Miles Hobert, and William Stroud Esq about an Escape, the case afterwards to be Argued in that Court: These Persons be∣ing removed, they being formerly Committed to the Marshalsey, for Misdemeanours in the Par∣liament 28 Car. 1. from that Prison to the Gate-house, the Keeper whereof gives the Prisoners leave to go out of the said Prison, and both he and the said Prisoners, were Judged both of them by the Judges of the said Court, Punishable, though it could not be proved that they ever were Prisoners in the old Prison of the Gate-House; but only in the Keepers House Adjoyning, except it was by their Voluntary withdrawment to give themselves the benefit of Nature, at the stool in the Adjoyning old Prison, and this was, as I before said, an Offence Punisha∣ble in both the Goaler and Prisoners, the Judg∣es likewise then determin'd that the Kings Bench Prison is not a Local Prison, but that every place where any person is restrain'd of his Liberty is his Prison, and if a Man enter Sanctuary, and thence depart, he may be said in Law to break Prison.
There had been a Project on soot, for the buying of Impropriations, but there being a Snake in the Grass detected, by Authority it was dashed.
Concerning Mr. Sanderson gives us this account, that in the Year 1627. Feoffees were legally intru∣sted to purchase in the Impropriations with their own and other good Mens Money, and with the pro∣fit to maintain a constant Preaching Ministry, where the Word was wanting. They consisted of four Divines to perswade the Conscience, 4 Lawyers for the Conveyances, and 4 Citizens, for no o∣ther end but their Money,
There are in England 9284. Parish Churche Endowed with Glebe and Tithes, but 3845 were either Appropriated to the Clergy, or Impropriated (as lay Fines) to private Persons, which latter these Feoffees endeavoured to redeem, and might have done it in Fifty Years, by the large Sums soon ad••anced: And no wonder, the Subtil∣ty was not then discerned, for in time the Purcha∣sers would become the prime Patrons, for number,