Concerning the Grace of God, how it is de∣fined by Osorius, with a confutation of his Definition.
ARguments increase, because here menti∣on falls in of the Grace of the regene∣rate. It is shewed, though against the Rules of Logick, that the Grace of God is nothing else but Iustice and Vertue, upon this account: because it being that chiefly, which makes us ac∣ceptable to God, and nothing can be acceptable to God, which is not like unto him, be thinks he pre∣vails sufficiently by this conclusion; That, because nothing 〈◊〉〈◊〉 us like God but Righrecusness and Vertue, Therefore Grace is nothing, if it is not Vertue and Iustice. Why do I use many words on this matter? If that Grace be understood by Osorius, which St. Paul so often commends to us in all his Epistles, both are false, which here the Bishop assumes against the Apostle. For Grace is not rightly