To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
A Worthy comparison for sooth, * 1.1 of God and Men, which dis∣annuls and destroys all the Promises of God, the whole Doctrine of the Gospel, yea and the foundations of all Re∣ligion. For to what purpose should God pro∣mise by his Word, if he would not have us assured of those things which are promised? A
Son was promised to Abraham, and he be∣lieved, not at all distrusting him that promised, and it is accounted a praise to him: What then? Do you praise the undaunted confidence of Abraham, and do you dispraise ours? In like manner the Seed to come was promised to mi∣serable Adam: To what purpose? that he might stick in a trembling wavering diffidence? or rather that he might support his mind with the expectation of the promised consolation? There are so many engagements of promises in both Covenants, which if the Divine Truth would not have made sure unto us, why then would he have them written in the Word, and recorded in Books? Briefly, why are we com∣manded in the Christian Articles of Faith to believe the remission of sins, the Resurrection of the flesh, and Life Eternal, but that we might reckon those things to be most sure unto us, which are inserted in the Articles? Therefore that is false, which Hosius affirms, That no man is bound to believe firmly, or to hold assuredly either concerning himself, or this man or that man, that his sins are for∣given him for Christ's sake; that he is in a state of grace, and that he is assu∣redly to possess the Kingdom of * 1.2 Heaven, &c. And again, neither is that less false, which he fathers upon men of our persuasion, as if we held thus, that every man is a partaker upon that account only, because he hath determined himself to be a person that will be accepted of God; which is not true,
and is not without an impudent calumny. For we are not of such an Opinion, as to believe that an assured persuasion of Mercy should by any means be separated from Iustifying Faith, (which the Divines of the Popish way do abo∣minably:) neither again do we transfer properly the very cause of Iustification into this confi∣dence and naked application of Marcy, (as they falsly slander us.) Why so? because, yet some other thing is wanting, which must needs go before this application of the Promise, and which is necessarily required to the true cause of Iustifying.
An Answer against the Hosian uncer∣tainty.
Hosius lib. 1. confut. p. 15. Hosius ibid. Osor. de Iust. l. 2. p. 32.