The principles and practices of certain moderate divines of the Church of England (greatly mis-understood), truly represented and defended wherein ... some controversies, of no mean importance, are succinctly discussed : in a free discourse between two intimate friends : in three parts.

About this Item

Title
The principles and practices of certain moderate divines of the Church of England (greatly mis-understood), truly represented and defended wherein ... some controversies, of no mean importance, are succinctly discussed : in a free discourse between two intimate friends : in three parts.
Author
Fowler, Edward, 1632-1714.
Publication
London :: Printed for Lodowick Lloyd ...,
1670.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Church of England -- Apologetic works.
Church of England -- Clergy.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A40084.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The principles and practices of certain moderate divines of the Church of England (greatly mis-understood), truly represented and defended wherein ... some controversies, of no mean importance, are succinctly discussed : in a free discourse between two intimate friends : in three parts." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A40084.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 23, 2025.

Pages

Page XV

The Contents.

  • The First Part, Page 1.
  • I. THE entrance into the Discourse Ibid.
  • ii. The hateful Character given by some to cer∣tain Friends of Theophilus and Phila∣lethes, 7
  • iii. An Argument of their being greatly abused in that Character, 12
  • iv. That Character due to the Broachers of Hobbi∣an Doctrine, 13
  • v. But that Doctrine by none better confuted than by these men, 14
  • vi. That Preaching some of their Adversaries Do∣ctrines, might render them too well deserving that Character, in the Iudgment of over-critical Per∣sons, ibid.
  • vii. Another Argument that they are abused, 18
  • viii. Theophilus undertaketh impartially to Repre∣sent them, 20
  • ix. Of their Practises, 22
  • x. Of their Conformity to the Ecclesiastical Laws, 23
  • ...

Page XVI

  • ... xi. The unreasonableness of Censuring Men upon the account of their Conformity, 24
  • xii. Of their Conversation, 37
  • xiii. Of their Preaching, 40
  • xiv. Of their Preaching the Reasonableness of the Christian Precepts, 42
  • xv. Of the Use of Reason in Matters of Religion, ibid.
  • xvi. 1 Cor. 2. 14. considered, 43
  • xvii. One advantage that is gotten by demonstrating the Reasonableness of Christian Duties, 49
  • xviii. The consideration of the goodness of the Do∣ctrine of the Gospel, necessary to accompany that of Miracles to prove its Divine Authority, ibid.
  • xix. Of the Testimony of the Spirit to the Truth of Scripture, 54
  • xx. Theophilus his Opinion concerning the inward Testimony of the Spirit, 56
  • xxi. The believing of Divine Things, a Divine Faith, whatever the Motives thereunto are, 58
  • xxii. Of Moral Certainty, 61
  • xxiii. Of the Scripture bearing Testimony to it self, 64
  • xxiv. A second Advantage gotten by demonstrating the Reasonableness of the Precepts of the Gospel, 66
  • xxv. In what sence the Precepts of the Gospel are highly reasonable, 69
  • xxvi. A Description of Reason, 70
  • xxvii. The first Proposition, shewing in what sence

Page XVII

  • the Precepts of the Gospel are reasonable, with a brief Demonstration that they are so, 71
  • xxviii. The Design of the Christian Religion, 72
  • xxix. The Second Proposition, ibid.
  • xxx. A more particular demonstration of the Reaso∣nableness of the Gospel Precepts, 75
  • xxxi. Almost all the Duties injoyned in the Gospel, commended by Heathens, 80
  • xxxii. Those vindicated from making the Gospel but a little better than a meer Natural Religion, that assert that Reason alone is able to prompt to us most of the Duties therein injoyned, 86
  • xxxiii. Wherein the Gospel excelleth all other Religi∣ons, 88
  • xxxiv. To say that what the Gospel requireth, is most suteable to Reason, is highly to commend it, &c. 91
  • xxxv. Of their Preaching the Reasonableness of the Points of meer belief, 93
  • xxxvi. All the Points of meer belief to be consistent with Reason sometimes proved by them, 94
  • xxxvii. That they do not endeavour to level all such Points with mens Capacities, 95
  • xxxviii. That they acknowledge incomprehensible My∣steries in the Christian Religion, ibid.
  • xxxix. That they prove the Consistency of such Points with Reason, as they are delivered in the Scrip∣ture only, 97
  • xl. That they assert many Speculative Points to be also suteable to the Dictates of Reason, ibid.
  • ...

Page XVIII

  • ... xli. An Argument drawn from Notions of the Hea∣thens, to prove the most weighty Points of Faith suteable to the Dictates of Reason, 98
  • xlii. Of their Style in Preaching, 104
  • xliii. Of their making Doctrines intelligible, 105
  • xliv. A sort of men that are Obscurers of the Go∣spel, ibid.
  • xlv. Another sort of such, 106
  • xlvi. Of the Perspicuity of Scripture, 108
  • xlvii. Their Opinion of powerful Preaching, 112
  • xlviii. Of Carnal and Spiritual Reason, 113
  • xlix. A farther account of their Preaching, 114
  • l. Of their being accused of Preaching up only a Mo∣ral Righteousness, 117
  • li. In what sence they do not so, and in what sence they do, ibid. & 118
  • lii. No difference betwixt Evangelical Righteous∣ness, and that which is the best sence Moral, 119
  • liii. To work in us such a Moral Righteousness, the Design of the Gospel, 120
  • liv. A Righteousness in no sence Moral a Contradi∣ction, 124
  • lv. Of Imputative Righteousness, and in what sence they believe and Preach it, 126
  • lvi. Their notion of Christ's imputed Righteousnesse, ibid.
  • lvii. A false notion of it, 128
  • lviii. The first Mistake in that Notion, 129
  • lix. The second Mistake, ibid.
  • ...

Page XIX

  • ... lx. A false definition of Faith they Confute in their Preaching, 130
  • lxi. Christ's imputed Righteousnesse no Scripture Phrase, 133
  • lxii. Some Verses in the fourth to the Romans con∣sidered, ibid.
  • lxiii. St. James 2. 23. considered, 135
  • lxiv. Philippians 3. 9. considered, 137
  • lxv. As high a favour to be dealt with, as if we were perfectly Righteous as to be so esteemed, 139
  • lxvi. The dangerous consequence of the Antinomian Doctrine about Imputed Righteousness, 141
  • lxvii. The Antinomians Opinion of Sin, 143
  • lxviii. Theophilus his Charity for some Antinomi∣ans, 146
  • lxix. A Defective Definition of Faith that those Di∣vines Preach against, and the ill consequence of it, 148
  • lxx. A full Definition of Faith ill applyed to the business of Iustifying, 154
  • lxxi. A full and plain Definition of Faith used by those Preachers, 157
  • lxxii. Of that Doctrine of those Preachers; that Faith justifyeth, as it implyeth Obedience, 159
  • lxxiii. An Argument to prove that Faith justifieth as it receiveth Christ quà Lord, as well as quà Savi∣our, 160
  • lxxiv. The Act of receiving Christ quà Lord to go before that of receiving him quà Priest, 161
  • lxxv. How Faith is distinguished from Repentance,

Page XX

  • and other vertues in the business of Iustification, 162
  • lxxvi. Why Iustification is mostly ascribed to Faith, 164
  • lxxvii. Two Acceptations of the Word Faith, ibid.
  • lxxviii. The vertue of Faith variously expressed in Scripture, ibid.
  • lxxix. How Faith justifieth, 165
  • lxxx. The Covenant of Grace conditional, 167
  • lxxxi. Hebrews 8. 10. considered, 168
  • lxxxii. Men not without all power to cooperate with with God's Grace in their Conversion, 174
  • lxxxiii. A middle way to be taken in giving account of Mens Conversion, 175
  • lxxxiv. Faith the Condition of the New Covenant, ibid.
  • lxxxv. Of their being accused for the foregoing Do∣ctrine, as holding Iustification by Works, and E∣nemies to God's Grace, 176
  • lxxxvi. A Digression concerning censuring men upon the account of their Opinions, ibid.
  • lxxxvii. A vindication of the foregoing account of Faith justifying from being opposite to free Grace, 180
  • lxxxviii. A vindication of that Doctrine, from asserting Iustification by Works in St. Paul's sence, 186
  • lxxxix. By Works, when opposed to Grace or Faith, New Obedience never meant, 188
  • xc. No Crime to hold Iustification by Works in St. James his sence, ibid.
  • ...

Page XXI

  • ... xci. St. Pauls Language not to be preferred before St. James his, 189
  • The Second Part. 190
  • i. A more distinct Account of their Opinions, ibid.
  • ii. Of their Iudgment in Doctrinals, 191
  • iii. In what sence the Church of England imposeth Subscription to the 39 Articles, ibid.
  • iv. The Lord Primate of Ireland his Testimony, ibid.
  • v. What Doctrines they most endeavour to Confute, 192
  • vi. Philalethes his Representation of Gods Nature, 193
  • vii. Consequences of Opinions not to be charged on all those that hold them, 198
  • viii. That they set themselves against the Doctrine of Gods absolute decreeing Mens Sin and Misery, 199
  • ix. That those two are not to be separated, 200
  • x. That those Doctrines make their Defenders assert two Wills in God; and the one contrary to the other, by which means other sad Consequences also fol∣low, 202
  • xi. Of opposing Gods Secret to his Revealed Will, 206
  • xii. That we must resolve to believe nothing at all, if we may believe nothing against which we cannot answer all Objections, 210
  • xiii. That the forementioned Doctrine evidently con∣tradicts our natural Notions, 213
  • ...

Page XXII

  • ... xiv. Which is the safest course in reconciling seem∣ingly contradictory Scriptures, 216
  • xv. Theophilus can believe no sence of Scripture that doth evidently contradict self-evident Noti∣ons, 217
  • xvi. Of that Opinion, That whatsoever God doth, is therefore good and just because He doth it, 218
  • xvii. What is the Motive inducing the good men of that Perswasion to go that way, 223
  • xviii. Those Divines middle way between the Calvi∣nists and Remonstrants, 228
  • xix. This way proposed by Catharinus at the Council of Trent, 231
  • xx. How it comes to pass that this way for some A∣ges had fewest Friends, 232
  • xxi. This Way, a great ease to Theophilus his Mind, 233
  • xxii. Philalethes no less beholden to it: which cau∣seth Theophilus to ask him some Questions, 236
  • xxiii. Of Free Will. 239
  • xxiv. Of the State of the Heathens, 249
  • xxv. That God hath wayes, though they may be per∣fectly unknown to us, to clear the Iustice and Good∣ness of his Dealings with all Mankind, 254
  • xxvi. Whether what must be acknowledged to defend that middle Way, tends to encourage security, &c. 256
  • xxvii. That the Doctrine discoursed against doth a world of mischief, 257
  • ...

Page XXIII

  • ... xxviii. The Test by which Theophilus examines Controver∣ted Points, 260
  • xxix. Of the great obscurity of St. Paul's Style in many pla∣ces, and the causes of it, 261
  • xxx. A Paraphrase upon several Verses, of the ninth to the Romans, 263
  • xxxi. How God is said to harden sinners, 275
  • xxxii. Philalethes offereth another Interpretation of the 19th and 20th Verses, 284
  • xxxiii. That the most Ancient Fathers were Enemies to abso∣lute Reprobation, with its Concomitants, 288
  • xxxiv. That the old Gnosticks were great Friends to it, 291
  • xxxv. Mr. Joseph Mede's Iudgment concerning this Point, 293
  • xxxvi. The Church of England no favourer of it, 294
  • xxxvii. The Moderation of those Divines in other Matters of Controversie, which Theophilus hath not time to insist upon, very remarkable, 295
  • xxxviii. None more disliked by them, than the Monopoli∣zers of Truth to a Party, 296
  • xxxix. Infallibility in the best of Men or Churches, denyed by them, 297
  • xl. Of the Infallibility of the Church, and those Protestants that seem to be sticklers for it, 298
  • xli. Of Acquiescing in the four first Occumenical Councils, 300
  • xlii. What Respect due to Councils, 302
  • xliii. The Church of Englands sence of General Councils, 304
  • xliv. The Determinations of our own Church, not to be op∣posed in Matters disputable, 305
  • xlv. An Argument that Christ intended us no Infallible Iudge of Controversies, 306
  • xlvi. Private Christians promised Infallibility in the same

Page XXIV

  • sense that the Church Representative hath the pro∣mise of it, 307
  • xlvii. Of Disputacity, 308
  • xlviii. Of Friendly Disputes, ibid.
  • xlix. The way to Peace, ibid.
  • l. The mischief of contending for an Infallible Iudge, 309
  • li. Forcing others to be of our mind Tyrannical, ibid.
  • lii. To condemn men for dissenting from us unwar∣rantable, 310
  • liii. Of those Divines Candor towards dissenters from them, 313
  • liv. Of Mr. Chillingworth's Book, 315
  • lv. Of their Opinion concerning Fundamentals, and that they are not forward to give a Catalogue of them, 316
  • lvi. The use of the foregoing Principles, 317
  • lvii. That those Divines procure to themselves Ene∣mies of divers sorts by their endeavours to propa∣gate those Principles, 319
  • The Third Part. 322
  • i. Their Iudgment in Matters of Discipline, ibid.
  • ii. That they prefer Episcopacy to all other Forms of Church Government, 323
  • iii. How much essential to Episcopacy, ibid.
  • iv. That they unchurch not those Churches that will not admit it, though they think it desirable that all would, 324
  • ...

Page XXV

  • ... v. Their Opinion of the Power of the Civil Magi∣strate in Sacred Affairs, 325
  • vi. That the Civil Magistrate hath a Power both Le∣gislative and Iudiciary in Ecclesiastical Affairs, ibid.
  • vii. Their Opinion of the Authority of the Church, 327
  • viii. That they believe Magistrates are to be obeyed, when they command things inconvenient, if law∣ful, 329
  • ix. That they judge it unlawful for the People to take Arms against their Prince, &c. on any pretence, 331
  • x. That they are for shewing favour to Dissenters out of Conscience, 332
  • xi. Whom they conceive are not to be dealt with as men of tender Consciences, 333
  • xii. Theophilus presumes that they would be glad, if some things that most offend were removed, &c. 334
  • xiii. Philalethes his Opinion upon the whole Account, 336
  • xiv. Why the Bigots of the several Parties are most∣ly their Enemies, 337
  • xv. That it is pity there should be any distinction of Name between Them, and the Moderate Men of some Parties, 339
  • xvi. What Name they onely desire to be known by, 340
  • ...

Page XXVI

  • ... xvii. That their Temper and Free Principles are of no late standing, &c. 341
  • xviii. Why the Pharisees could not endure our Savi∣our, ibid.
  • xix. When the Temper and Spirit that hath been de∣scribed, began to decay in the Christian World, 343
  • xx. The Pope beholden to the Decay thereof for his Power, 344
  • xxi. That it is much revived in the Protestant Churches, though the Generality are still greatly defective in it, 345
  • xxii. If the Invisible Antichrist were once fallen, the Visible one would quickly follow, ibid.
  • xxiii. The Conclusion, 346

Theophilus, a Lover of God. Philalethes, a Lover of Truth.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.