The principles and practices of certain moderate divines of the Church of England (greatly mis-understood), truly represented and defended wherein ... some controversies, of no mean importance, are succinctly discussed : in a free discourse between two intimate friends : in three parts.
About this Item
Title
The principles and practices of certain moderate divines of the Church of England (greatly mis-understood), truly represented and defended wherein ... some controversies, of no mean importance, are succinctly discussed : in a free discourse between two intimate friends : in three parts.
Author
Fowler, Edward, 1632-1714.
Publication
London :: Printed for Lodowick Lloyd ...,
1670.
Rights/Permissions
To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
Subject terms
Church of England -- Apologetic works.
Church of England -- Clergy.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A40084.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The principles and practices of certain moderate divines of the Church of England (greatly mis-understood), truly represented and defended wherein ... some controversies, of no mean importance, are succinctly discussed : in a free discourse between two intimate friends : in three parts." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A40084.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 23, 2025.
Pages
descriptionPage XV
The Contents.
The First Part, Page 1.
I. THE entrance into the Discourse Ibid.
ii. The hateful Character given by some to cer∣tain
Friends of Theophilus and Phila∣lethes,
7
iii. An Argument of their being greatly abused in
that Character, 12
iv. That Character due to the Broachers of Hobbi∣an
Doctrine, 13
v. But that Doctrine by none better confuted than by
these men, 14
vi. That Preaching some of their Adversaries Do∣ctrines,
might render them too well deserving that
Character, in the Iudgment of over-critical Per∣sons,
ibid.
vii. Another Argument that they are abused, 18
viii. Theophilus undertaketh impartially to Repre∣sent
them, 20
ix. Of their Practises, 22
x. Of their Conformity to the Ecclesiastical Laws, 23
...
descriptionPage XVI
...xi. The unreasonableness of Censuring Men upon the
account of their Conformity, 24
xii. Of their Conversation, 37
xiii. Of their Preaching, 40
xiv. Of their Preaching the Reasonableness of the
Christian Precepts, 42
xv. Of the Use of Reason in Matters of Religion,
ibid.
xvi. 1 Cor. 2. 14. considered, 43
xvii. One advantage that is gotten by demonstrating
the Reasonableness of Christian Duties, 49
xviii. The consideration of the goodness of the Do∣ctrine
of the Gospel, necessary to accompany that of
Miracles to prove its Divine Authority, ibid.
xix. Of the Testimony of the Spirit to the Truth of
Scripture, 54
xx. Theophilus his Opinion concerning the inward
Testimony of the Spirit, 56
xxi. The believing of Divine Things, a Divine Faith,
whatever the Motives thereunto are, 58
xxii. Of Moral Certainty, 61
xxiii. Of the Scripture bearing Testimony to it self,
64
xxiv. A second Advantage gotten by demonstrating
the Reasonableness of the Precepts of the Gospel,
66
xxv. In what sence the Precepts of the Gospel are
highly reasonable, 69
xxvi. A Description of Reason, 70
xxvii. The first Proposition, shewing in what sence
descriptionPage XVII
the Precepts of the Gospel are reasonable, with a
brief Demonstration that they are so, 71
xxviii. The Design of the Christian Religion, 72
xxix. The Second Proposition, ibid.
xxx. A more particular demonstration of the Reaso∣nableness
of the Gospel Precepts, 75
xxxi. Almost all the Duties injoyned in the Gospel,
commended by Heathens, 80
xxxii. Those vindicated from making the Gospel but
a little better than a meer Natural Religion, that
assert that Reason alone is able to prompt to us most
of the Duties therein injoyned, 86
xxxiii. Wherein the Gospel excelleth all other Religi∣ons,
88
xxxiv. To say that what the Gospel requireth, is most
suteable to Reason, is highly to commend it, &c.
91
xxxv. Of their Preaching the Reasonableness of the
Points of meer belief, 93
xxxvi. All the Points of meer belief to be consistent
with Reason sometimes proved by them, 94
xxxvii. That they do not endeavour to level all such
Points with mens Capacities, 95
xxxviii. That they acknowledge incomprehensible My∣steries
in the Christian Religion, ibid.
xxxix. That they prove the Consistency of such Points
with Reason, as they are delivered in the Scrip∣ture
only, 97
xl. That they assert many Speculative Points to be
also suteable to the Dictates of Reason, ibid.
...
descriptionPage XVIII
...xli. An Argument drawn from Notions of the Hea∣thens,
to prove the most weighty Points of Faith
suteable to the Dictates of Reason, 98
xlii. Of their Style in Preaching, 104
xliii. Of their making Doctrines intelligible, 105
xliv. A sort of men that are Obscurers of the Go∣spel,
ibid.
xlv. Another sort of such, 106
xlvi. Of the Perspicuity of Scripture, 108
xlvii. Their Opinion of powerful Preaching, 112
xlviii. Of Carnal and Spiritual Reason, 113
xlix. A farther account of their Preaching, 114
l. Of their being accused of Preaching up only a Mo∣ral
Righteousness, 117
li. In what sence they do not so, and in what sence
they do, ibid. & 118
lii. No difference betwixt Evangelical Righteous∣ness,
and that which is the best sence Moral, 119
liii. To work in us such a Moral Righteousness, the
Design of the Gospel, 120
liv. A Righteousness in no sence Moral a Contradi∣ction,
124
lv. Of Imputative Righteousness, and in what sence
they believe and Preach it, 126
lvi. Their notion of Christ's imputed Righteousnesse,
ibid.
lvii. A false notion of it, 128
lviii. The first Mistake in that Notion, 129
lix. The second Mistake, ibid.
...
descriptionPage XIX
...lx. A false definition of Faith they Confute in their
Preaching, 130
lxi. Christ's imputed Righteousnesse no Scripture
Phrase, 133
lxii. Some Verses in the fourth to the Romans con∣sidered,
ibid.
lxiii. St. James 2. 23. considered, 135
lxiv. Philippians 3. 9. considered, 137
lxv. As high a favour to be dealt with, as if we were
perfectly Righteous as to be so esteemed, 139
lxvi. The dangerous consequence of the Antinomian
Doctrine about Imputed Righteousness, 141
lxvii. The Antinomians Opinion of Sin, 143
lxviii. Theophilus his Charity for some Antinomi∣ans,
146
lxix. A Defective Definition of Faith that those Di∣vines
Preach against, and the ill consequence of it,
148
lxx. A full Definition of Faith ill applyed to the
business of Iustifying, 154
lxxi. A full and plain Definition of Faith used by
those Preachers, 157
lxxii. Of that Doctrine of those Preachers; that
Faith justifyeth, as it implyeth Obedience, 159
lxxiii. An Argument to prove that Faith justifieth as
it receiveth Christ quà Lord, as well as quà Savi∣our,
160
lxxiv. The Act of receiving Christ quà Lord to go
before that of receiving him quà Priest, 161
lxxv. How Faith is distinguished from Repentance,
descriptionPage XX
and other vertues in the business of Iustification,
162
lxxvi. Why Iustification is mostly ascribed to Faith,
164
lxxvii. Two Acceptations of the Word Faith, ibid.
lxxviii. The vertue of Faith variously expressed in
Scripture, ibid.
lxxix. How Faith justifieth, 165
lxxx. The Covenant of Grace conditional, 167
lxxxi. Hebrews 8. 10. considered, 168
lxxxii. Men not without all power to cooperate with
with God's Grace in their Conversion, 174
lxxxiii. A middle way to be taken in giving account
of Mens Conversion, 175
lxxxiv. Faith the Condition of the New Covenant,
ibid.
lxxxv. Of their being accused for the foregoing Do∣ctrine,
as holding Iustification by Works, and E∣nemies
to God's Grace, 176
lxxxvi. A Digression concerning censuring men upon
the account of their Opinions, ibid.
lxxxvii. A vindication of the foregoing account of
Faith justifying from being opposite to free Grace,
180
lxxxviii. A vindication of that Doctrine, from
asserting Iustification by Works in St. Paul's
sence, 186
lxxxix. By Works, when opposed to Grace or Faith,
New Obedience never meant, 188
xc. No Crime to hold Iustification by Works in St.
James his sence, ibid.
...
descriptionPage XXI
...xci. St. Pauls Language not to be preferred before
St. James his, 189
The Second Part. 190
i. A more distinct Account of their Opinions, ibid.
ii. Of their Iudgment in Doctrinals, 191
iii. In what sence the Church of England imposeth
Subscription to the 39 Articles, ibid.
iv. The Lord Primate of Ireland his Testimony, ibid.
v. What Doctrines they most endeavour to Confute,
192
vi. Philalethes his Representation of Gods Nature,
193
vii. Consequences of Opinions not to be charged on
all those that hold them, 198
viii. That they set themselves against the Doctrine of
Gods absolute decreeing Mens Sin and Misery, 199
ix. That those two are not to be separated, 200
x. That those Doctrines make their Defenders assert
two Wills in God; and the one contrary to the other,
by which means other sad Consequences also fol∣low,
202
xi. Of opposing Gods Secret to his Revealed Will,
206
xii. That we must resolve to believe nothing at all, if
we may believe nothing against which we cannot
answer all Objections, 210
xiii. That the forementioned Doctrine evidently con∣tradicts
our natural Notions, 213
...
descriptionPage XXII
...xiv. Which is the safest course in reconciling seem∣ingly
contradictory Scriptures, 216
xv. Theophilus can believe no sence of Scripture
that doth evidently contradict self-evident Noti∣ons,
217
xvi. Of that Opinion, That whatsoever God doth, is
therefore good and just because He doth it, 218
xvii. What is the Motive inducing the good men
of that Perswasion to go that way, 223
xviii. Those Divines middle way between the Calvi∣nists
and Remonstrants, 228
xix. This way proposed by Catharinus at the Council
of Trent, 231
xx. How it comes to pass that this way for some A∣ges
had fewest Friends, 232
xxi. This Way, a great ease to Theophilus his
Mind, 233
xxii. Philalethes no less beholden to it: which cau∣seth
Theophilus to ask him some Questions, 236
xxiii. Of Free Will. 239
xxiv. Of the State of the Heathens, 249
xxv. That God hath wayes, though they may be per∣fectly
unknown to us, to clear the Iustice and Good∣ness
of his Dealings with all Mankind, 254
xxvi. Whether what must be acknowledged to defend
that middle Way, tends to encourage security, &c.
256
xxvii. That the Doctrine discoursed against doth a
world of mischief, 257
...
descriptionPage XXIII
...xxviii. The Test by which Theophilus examines Controver∣ted
Points, 260
xxix. Of the great obscurity of St. Paul's Style in many pla∣ces,
and the causes of it, 261
xxx. A Paraphrase upon several Verses, of the ninth to the
Romans, 263
xxxi. How God is said to harden sinners, 275
xxxii. Philalethes offereth another Interpretation of the
19th and 20th Verses, 284
xxxiii. That the most Ancient Fathers were Enemies to abso∣lute
Reprobation, with its Concomitants, 288
xxxiv. That the old Gnosticks were great Friends to it,
291
xxxv. Mr. Joseph Mede's Iudgment concerning this Point,
293
xxxvi. The Church of England no favourer of it, 294
xxxvii. The Moderation of those Divines in other Matters
of Controversie, which Theophilus hath not time to insist
upon, very remarkable, 295
xxxviii. None more disliked by them, than the Monopoli∣zers
of Truth to a Party, 296
xxxix. Infallibility in the best of Men or Churches, denyed
by them, 297
xl. Of the Infallibility of the Church, and those Protestants
that seem to be sticklers for it, 298
xli. Of Acquiescing in the four first Occumenical Councils,
300
xlii. What Respect due to Councils, 302
xliii. The Church of Englands sence of General Councils,
304
xliv. The Determinations of our own Church, not to be op∣posed
in Matters disputable, 305
xlv. An Argument that Christ intended us no Infallible Iudge
of Controversies, 306
xlvi. Private Christians promised Infallibility in the same
descriptionPage XXIV
sense that the Church Representative hath the pro∣mise
of it, 307
xlvii. Of Disputacity, 308
xlviii. Of Friendly Disputes, ibid.
xlix. The way to Peace, ibid.
l. The mischief of contending for an Infallible
Iudge, 309
li. Forcing others to be of our mind Tyrannical, ibid.
lii. To condemn men for dissenting from us unwar∣rantable,
310
liii. Of those Divines Candor towards dissenters from
them, 313
liv. Of Mr. Chillingworth's Book, 315
lv. Of their Opinion concerning Fundamentals, and
that they are not forward to give a Catalogue of
them, 316
lvi. The use of the foregoing Principles, 317
lvii. That those Divines procure to themselves Ene∣mies
of divers sorts by their endeavours to propa∣gate
those Principles, 319
The Third Part. 322
i. Their Iudgment in Matters of Discipline, ibid.
ii. That they prefer Episcopacy to all other Forms
of Church Government, 323
iii. How much essential to Episcopacy, ibid.
iv. That they unchurch not those Churches that will
not admit it, though they think it desirable that all
would, 324
...
descriptionPage XXV
...v. Their Opinion of the Power of the Civil Magi∣strate
in Sacred Affairs, 325
vi. That the Civil Magistrate hath a Power both Le∣gislative
and Iudiciary in Ecclesiastical Affairs,
ibid.
vii. Their Opinion of the Authority of the Church,
327
viii. That they believe Magistrates are to be obeyed,
when they command things inconvenient, if law∣ful,
329
ix. That they judge it unlawful for the People to take
Arms against their Prince, &c. on any pretence,
331
x. That they are for shewing favour to Dissenters
out of Conscience, 332
xi. Whom they conceive are not to be dealt with as
men of tender Consciences, 333
xii. Theophilus presumes that they would be glad,
if some things that most offend were removed, &c.
334
xiii. Philalethes his Opinion upon the whole Account,
336
xiv. Why the Bigots of the several Parties are most∣ly
their Enemies, 337
xv. That it is pity there should be any distinction of
Name between Them, and the Moderate Men of
some Parties, 339
xvi. What Name they onely desire to be known by,
340
...
descriptionPage XXVI
...xvii. That their Temper and Free Principles are of
no late standing, &c. 341
xviii. Why the Pharisees could not endure our Savi∣our,
ibid.
xix. When the Temper and Spirit that hath been de∣scribed,
began to decay in the Christian World,
343
xx. The Pope beholden to the Decay thereof for his
Power, 344
xxi. That it is much revived in the Protestant
Churches, though the Generality are still greatly
defective in it, 345
xxii. If the Invisible Antichrist were once fallen, the
Visible one would quickly follow, ibid.
xxiii. The Conclusion, 346
Theophilus, a Lover of God.
Philalethes, a Lover of Truth.
email
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem?
Please contact us.