though the Diall it selfe be not so. And further, that if the Diall plate move, (though it be not a plain it selfe, yet) it must move upon a plain, and that the proper Meridian is to be described upon the same plain, and the motion to be directed according thereunto. These things are often incul∣cated, because they are hard to be conceived, and had need of the better consideration for that reason. Now further.
1. If the Diall plate be supposed thus to move upon a plain, and on it the proper Meridian be drawn, then first of all, The angle is to be inquired that is made between the In∣dex and that part of the proper Meridian which is projected upon the plain whereon the motion is made, which how to measure will be a hard matter to give rules for, because the variety of cases and positions of one to the other will be so various. It is first to be supposed, that it makes a just right angle with it, and consequently that the Zodiac is described upon the proper horizon of the Index. And if upon this supposition the Zodiac be to be limited, then the rule will be the same with the former given in the like case, namely thus. Upon your Scale of Sines (by which you described your Ellipticall line) take from 90, to the Latitude of the Index, and count that length for a new Radius, and keepe it. Then when you have found the forenamed angle (of finding which more is said Prop. 13. following) to this new Radius finde the Secant of the complement or excesse of that angle: this length or Secant will be the Tangent of 45 gr. or the Decimall Scale by which you are to describe the Zo∣diac on both sides from the Equinoctiall point or line, ac∣cording to the numbers in the generall Tables made for this purpose, Pag. 4, 5, 6, and 7.
[For placing the Equinoctiall point in the Zodiac (upon which all the other parts of that Scale do depend)