Page 286
THE regret, reluctancy, and sorrows expressed by the Soul at parting, do strongly argue its inclination to a re-union with it, when it is actually separated from it. For why should we surmise that the Soul which mourn'd and groan'd so deeply at parting; which clasp'd and embraced it so dearly and affectionately; which fought, strugled and dis∣puted the passage with death every foot and inch of ground it got; and would not part with the Body till by plain force it was rent out of its arms: should not when absent, desire to see and enjoy its old and endeared friend again? Hath it lost its affection, though it continue its relation? thats ve∣ry improbable. Or doth its advancement in Heaven make it regardless of its Body which lies in contempt and misery? that's an effect which Christs personal glory never produced in him towards us, nor a good mans perferment would pro∣duce in him to his poor and miserable friends in this World, as we see in the case of Ioseph but now instanced in. It is therefore harsh and incongruous to suppose the Souls love to the Body was extinguished in the parting hour, and that now, out of sight, out of mind.
* 1.1But was it not urged before in opposition to this asser∣tion, that the Souls of the righteous looked upon their Bodies as their Prisons, and sighed for deliverance by death, and greatly rejoiced in the hope and foresight of that liberty death would restore them to? How doth this consist with such reluctancies at parting, and inclinations to re-union?
* 1.2The objection doth not suppose any man to be totally free from all reluctancies and unwillingness to die. The holi∣est Souls that ever lived in Bodies of flesh will give an un∣willing shrug when it comes to the parting point, 2 Cor. 5.2. But this their willingness to be gone arises from two other grounds, which make i•• consistent enough with its reluctan∣cies at parting, and inclination to a second meeting.