DOCT. 2. That all believers are at their death,* 1.1 immediately received into a State of glory and eternal happiness.
This day shalt thou be with me.
This the Atheist denies, he thinks he shall die, and therefore re∣solves to live as the Beasts that perish. Beryllus and some others after him, taught, that there was indeed a ••uture state of happiness and misery for souls, but that they pass not into it immediatly upon death and separation from the body, but shall sleep till the Resurrection and then awake and enter into it. But is not that soul asleep, or worse, that dreams of a sleeping soul till the Resurre∣ction. Are souls so wounded and prejudiced by their separation from the body, that they cannot subsist or act separate from it? Or have they found any such conceit in the Scriptures? Not at all. The Scriptures take notice of no such interval; but plainly enough denies it, 2 Cor. 5.8. We are confident I say, and willing rather to be absent from the body, and present with the Lord. Mark it, no sooner parted from the body, but present with the Lord. So Phil. 1.23. I desire to be dissolved, and to be with Christ, which is far better. If his soul was to sleep till the Resurrection, how was it far better to be dissolved, than to live? Sure Pauls state in the body had-been far better, than his state after death, if this were so; for here he enjoyed much sweet communion with God by Faith, but then he should enjoy nothing.
To confirm this dream, they urge Ioh 14.3. If I go my way, I will come again and receive you to my self. As if the time of Christs receiving his people to himself should not come, until his second coming at the end of the world. But though he will then