CHAP. II.
HAving shewed what truly and properly the Scripture is, and what we, the Quakers, intend, and I.O. also (if we may take him as meaning, what he mostly sayes) by that Term (Scripture) when we deny it to be what thou contend'st it to be, and pleadest against us for, as its Proper Name, viz. the Word of God, &c. I come next to those base abuses put upon us, and false matters charged against us (partly) by T.D. in his first Pamphlet, but (principally) by thee I.O. as concerning our carriage toward the Scriptures, Principally in thy Latine Legend, wherein thou lyest more at liberty, then in thy two English pieces of emptinesse, and the more securely by how much thou seemest (to thy self at least) to lye more hidden, or more obscurely, out of the reach of their rebuke, whom thou reproachest in that Latine Language, then in the other; insomuch that by thy own speeches we may conclude, that thy whole work (as relating to the Quakers) which is fronted (but fronti nulla fides) with Pro Scripturis, Adversus Fanaticos, for the Scriptures against the Fanaticks (with which new nick-name the Quakers by many more besides thy self, who (Arbitrio Diabolico) wast one of the first Im∣posers of it on that (truly) enlightned people, begin now to be abusively branded) seems to be designed more to the sporting thy own and thy School∣fellowes le••d spightful Spirits, by playing upon the Quakers in secret, in your dark Divinity cels among your selves, then either to convince them to their faces of such errors as thou erroneously accusest them of, or by thy crude The∣ological Disputations, Determinations (tumultuarie sane fatis conscriptas) as thou callest them ad lectorem, to confute the Quakers plainly and openly, before Plain-hearted people; witnesse thy own saying to the like effect, which I shall first enter at, as it lies in thy little Latine Lecture Ad Lecto∣rem.
† 1.1J.O. The Fanaticks (or with thee the Quak), who are in these dayes most notable in their errors and foolishnesse, we here Principally assault. But no man could be deemed to dote so much as my self, if I aimed at the convincing of them by what I here write