Page 43
THE TRIAL BETWIXT TITUS OATES And ME.
IDeclar'd against him, for saying that I was a Popish Priest, and had been circumcised as a Mahumetan; to which the Doctor pleaded not guilty, upon which we joyn'd issue, ha∣ving June the 30th, appointed for a day of Trial. The words were plainly prov'd by the Honourable Ralph Grey Esquire, and Mr. William Durham a Clergy-man, before whom he had spoke them; after which, my Council were proceeding to aggravate the charge by proof, that he had not only said these words in several companies, and more especially before his Majesty, (as Captain George Collingwood, was there in Court ready to attest, though not call'd upon, that he heard Titus Oates depose in his Majesties presence, that I was a Jesuit, and was sent over from Ireland, under the masque of a Clergy-man of the Church of England, to be a spy:) as also that he had ma∣liciously swore to the truth of those calumnies and slandering expressions a∣gainst me; but the Council of the Defendant, conceded that the words were prov'd sufficiently, begg'd leave to offer something in mitigation of Dammages: viz. some proof that Titus, if he did speak such words as were prov'd, yet he spoke them only jocularly, as who had no malicious design. No not he, good man was of so tender a conscience, that he would not discompose the Hair of a mans head, for a thousand worlds, (as is clear in the case of the Lord Stafford, and the Jesuites who suffer'd; (the pious Doctor, God wot, had no malice against them, he only had them hang'd up jocularly, or so, (for truly hanging is but an ordinary jest with him.) And in order hereunto, the first who appear'd to qualify the Doctor's words, and honour the cause was the Noble Peer Charles Lord North and Grey. It was by many lookt upon with admiration, that his Lordship would appear in defence of an already baffled cause, and for the encourage∣ment