from the hands of Bishop Laney of Ely, and of Priest, An. 1672, from Bishop Henchman of London, according to the rites of the Church of England now by Law established. Moreover, if ever I wrote any such Letter as Oates swears I did, to the Rector of St. Omers or any other person, or if ever Oates saw any such Letter writ by me. And that I may satisfy the Reader as far as I can, in the proof of a Negative, I declare my name was never known to be Elliot beyond Sea, as hun∣dreds can attest; and besides to shew that that Rogue's wickedness is more my concern than the danger of my life, I will put it to the venture, and gage my life against his (if the law will permit,) that he knows not my hand-writing from any other which he never saw. If I had received Orders from the See of Rome, I needed not to be Reordained, our Church holding the Romish Ordination to be va∣lid.
But because his chief aim in his Depositions, was to invalidate my Testimony, he is not content to have made me a Priest, but he boldly calls God to witness that I am a Renegado and a Mahumetan; swearing, I, that I was carried a Slave into Barbary: 2ly, that there, as it was generally and credibly reported, I was circumcis'd: 3ly, that I con∣fess'd I gave poyson to my Patron: 4ly, that after that, I returned to Rome: 5ly, that I made a Recantation there: 6ly, that he saw this Re∣cantation under my own hand, being well acquainted with my character. In every of which particulars, I do affirm, and engage my self to prove Titus Oates to have sworn falsely, and I challenge all his friends to undertake his defence from the imputation of having sworn in some of these instances, maliciously and contrary to his knowledge, and in some others (to put the best construction,) rashly, and in all falsely.
As to the first, Oates never saw me in Barbary, therefore he swore beyond the sphere of his knowledge, and howsoever it be materially true, yet it is formally false in him, who swears at random, and calls God to witness his certainty of the truth in a matter which he cannot know whether it be true or false; yea, which he has more reason to believe to be false than true, according to his own Oath, as afterwards it follows in the Depositions, that after I came to England, and when I lived in Kent, An. 1673, I was much given to swearing that to be true, which was not so: then thus I argue ad hominem, all the in∣telligence that Oates had of my having been in Barbary, and a Slave there, proceeded from my own information to several persons, be∣fore it came to his hands, and therefore seeing I was the sole author of the Narrative of my Captivity, Oates had more reason to believe it false than otherwise. And besides, the account of my escape ap∣pear'd so Romantick, that a great many persons who heard it, thought themselves oblig'd upon good prudential considerations to suspend their judgments, and to doubt whether ever I was in Barbary or not; so that Oates by swearing positively that I was carried a Slave into Barbary, has sworn to the truth of that which he could not be certain of, and which he had much more reason to believe to be false.
2. As to the second particular, that there (viz. in Barbary) it was generally and credibly reported that I was circumcis'd; this Oath is also