CHAP. XXIII. Concerning the Arians at Constantinople, who were also termed the Psathyriani.
MOreover, there arose dissentions amongst the Arians, upon this occasion. The contentious questions daily [started] amongst them, had reduced their discourses to some ab∣surdities. For, whereas it has been always be∣lieved in the Church, that God is the Father of the Son the Word; there hapned this Query amongst them, whether or no God could be cal∣led Father even before the Son existed? And, in regard they asserted, that the Word of God was not begotten of the Father, but existed of * 1.1 nothing; being thus mistaken about the first and chiefest Article of Faith, they deservedly fell into an absurd contentiousness about a bare word. Dorotheus therefore † 1.2 who had been sent for from Antioch by them, maintained, that [God] neither was nor could be termed a Father, before the Son existed. But Marinus (whom they had called out of Thracia before Dorotheus) having got a fair opportunity, (for he was vext because Dorotheus had been prefer∣red before him:) undertook to desend the con∣trary opinion. For this reason there hapned a dissention amongst them: and being divided on account of the foresaid Term, each party held separate Meetings. Those under Dorotheus con∣tinued possest of their own Meeting-houses. But Marinus's followers built themselves private O∣ratories, wherein they had their Assemblies; and asserted that the Father was always the Father, even when the Son existed not. Moreover, the maintainers of this assertion were termed a 1.3 Psa∣thyriani, because one Theoctistus by Country a Syrian, a * 1.4 Psathyropola by Trade, was a zea∣lous defender of this Opinion. Selenas Bishop of the Goths became a follower of these persons Tenets: † 1.5 He was a man of a mixt descent, a Goth by his fathers side, by his mothers a Phry∣gian. And upon this account he taught in the Church very readily in both these Languages. Further, this faction soon after quarrelled a∣mongst themselves; Marinus disagreeing with Agapius, whom he himself had preferred to the Bishoprick of Ephesus. But these two contended not one with another about [any point of their] Religion, but about * 1.6 Prima∣cy; the Goths sided with Agapius. Wherefore, many of the Ecclesiasticks under their juris∣diction (abominating the contest raised between them two, as being the product of their vain glory,) deserted them, and became adherents to the Homoöusian Faith. When therefore the Arians had continued divided amongst them∣selves during the space of b 1.7 thirty five years, afterwards, c 1.8 under the Reign of Theodosius Junior, in the Consulate of Plintha Master of the Milice, the Heresie of the Psathyriani being perswaded to cease from contending, were again united in one body [with the rest of the A∣rians.] And they made a Sanction [amongst themselves] in form of a Law as it were, that that Query, which had caused the separation be∣tween them, should in future never be mentio∣ned. But they could bring this to effect no where save at Constantinople only. For in other Cities (if any of these two parties chan∣ced to be inhabitants therein,) they persisted in their former separation. Thus much concer∣ning the division amongst the Arians.