The history of the church from our Lords incarnation, to the twelth year of the Emperour Maricius Tiberius, or the Year of Christ 594 / as it was written in Greek, by Eusebius Pamphilius ..., Socrates Scholasticus, and Evagrius Scholasticus ... ; made English from that edition of these historians, which Valesius published at Paris in the years 1659, 1668, and 1673 ; also, The life of Constantine in four books, written by Eusibius Pamphilus, with Constantine's Oration to the convention of the saints, and Eusebius's Speech in praise of Constantine, spoken at his tricennalia ; Valesius's annotations on these authors, are done into English, and set at their proper places in the margin, as likewise a translation of his account of their lives and writings ; with two index's, the one, of the principal matters that occur in the text, the other, of those contained in the notes.

About this Item

Title
The history of the church from our Lords incarnation, to the twelth year of the Emperour Maricius Tiberius, or the Year of Christ 594 / as it was written in Greek, by Eusebius Pamphilius ..., Socrates Scholasticus, and Evagrius Scholasticus ... ; made English from that edition of these historians, which Valesius published at Paris in the years 1659, 1668, and 1673 ; also, The life of Constantine in four books, written by Eusibius Pamphilus, with Constantine's Oration to the convention of the saints, and Eusebius's Speech in praise of Constantine, spoken at his tricennalia ; Valesius's annotations on these authors, are done into English, and set at their proper places in the margin, as likewise a translation of his account of their lives and writings ; with two index's, the one, of the principal matters that occur in the text, the other, of those contained in the notes.
Author
Eusebius, of Caesarea, Bishop of Caesarea, ca. 260-ca. 340.
Publication
Cambridge :: Printed by John Hayes ... for Han. Sawbridge ...,
1683.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Church history -- Primitive and early church, ca. 30-600.
Persecution -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A38749.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The history of the church from our Lords incarnation, to the twelth year of the Emperour Maricius Tiberius, or the Year of Christ 594 / as it was written in Greek, by Eusebius Pamphilius ..., Socrates Scholasticus, and Evagrius Scholasticus ... ; made English from that edition of these historians, which Valesius published at Paris in the years 1659, 1668, and 1673 ; also, The life of Constantine in four books, written by Eusibius Pamphilus, with Constantine's Oration to the convention of the saints, and Eusebius's Speech in praise of Constantine, spoken at his tricennalia ; Valesius's annotations on these authors, are done into English, and set at their proper places in the margin, as likewise a translation of his account of their lives and writings ; with two index's, the one, of the principal matters that occur in the text, the other, of those contained in the notes." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A38749.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 15, 2024.

Pages

CHAP. X. That the Emperour ordered a Synod of all the Sects to be convened, at which time Arcadius his son was proclaimed Augustus; and that the Nova∣tians (who as to their faith embraced the same sentiments with the Homoöusians) were the only persons that had permission to hold their assemblies within the City. But the other Hereticks were forced from thence.

BUt, there were disturbances in other Cities also, [which hapned] at such time as the Arians were ejected out of the Churches. On account whereof I cannot choose but admire the Emperours judiciousness and prudence. For he suffered not (so far as it was in his power [to prevent them,]) the Cities to be filled with tumultuous disturbances: but with∣in a short space of time, ordered a Synod of all the Heresies to be again convened, supposing that by a mutual conference of the Bishops, one con∣cordant opinion would prevail amongst all men. I am of opinion, that this design of the Empe∣rour's was the cause of that fortunate success he [then] had. For, about the same time, by a particular dispensation of divine providence, the Barbarous Nations were reduced to a subjection to him. And amongst others, Athanarichus King of the Goths made a Surrendry of himself with all his own people unto him, a 1.1 who soon after died at Constantinople. Moreover, at that time the Emperour pro∣claimed his Son Arcadius, Augustus, in the second Con∣sulate of * 1.2 Merobaudes which he bore with † 1.3 Saturninus, on the sixteenth of January. Not long after these things, the Bishops of every Sect ar∣rived from all places, in the same Consulate, in the month June. The Emperour therefore having sent for Ne∣ctarius the Bishop, consul∣ted with him, what project should be made use of that the Christian Religion might be freed from dissentions, and the Church reduced to an Union. And he said, that that Controversie which caused a separation in the Churches, ought to be discussed, that so by a removal of the Discord, an agree∣ment might be effected in the Churches. At the hearing of this Nectarius was full of anxiety and sollicitude. And having sent for Agelius

Page 335

then Bishop of the Novatians, (in regard he was a person that embraced the same sentiments with him as to the Faith,) he makes known to him the Emperours intent. He, as to other things, was indeed a very pious person: but be∣ing not very able to maintain a dispute, con∣cerning the Doctrine [of Faith,] he proposes his Reader under him, by name Sisinnius, as a fit per∣son to manage a Conference. But Sisinnius (an eloquent man, and well experienced in affairs, one who had an accurate skill in the expositions of the Sacred Scriptures, and in Philosophick o∣pinions,) knew that these Disputations do not only not unite dissentions, but also raise Heresies to an higher degree of contention. Upon which account, he gave Nectarius this advice. In re∣gard he very well knew, that the Ancients avoided the attributing a beginning of Existence to the Son of God; (for they apprehended him to be Coeternal with the Father;) he advises him to shun Logical disputes; and to produce for evi∣dences the b 1.4 Expositions of the Ancients: and that the Emperour should propose to the Chiefs of each Heresie this question, Whether they would entertain any respect for the Ancients who c 1.5 flou∣rished before the dissention in the Church, or whether they would reject them as estranged from the Chri∣stian Religion? For if they reject them [said he,] then let them dare to Anathema∣tize them. And if they shall be so audacious as to do that, the multitude will forth∣with extrude them by vio∣lence. Upon the doing where∣of, the truth will undoubt∣edly obtain a manifest victo∣ry. But, if they shall refuse to reject the Ancient Do∣ctours, then it will be our business to produce the Books of the Ancients, whereby our opinion will be attested and confirmed. Nectarius ha∣ving heard all this from Si∣sinnius, goes in great hast to the Pallace; and makes the Emperour acquainted with the advice which had been given him. The Emperour em∣braces it with much eagerness, and handled the matter prudently. For, without discovering his design, he asked [the Chiefs of the Hereticks] this one question, Whether they had any respect for, and admitted of those Doctours of the Church [who lived] before [the rise of] the dissention? Upon their non-refusal of them, and their affirming that they highly revered and ho∣noured them as being their Masters; the Empe∣rour enquired of them again, whether they would * 1.6 acquiesse in them as witnesses of the Christian Religion worthy to be credited? When the Chiefs of the Sects and their Logicians (for they had amongst them many persons well provided for the combat of dispute;) heard this, they knew not what to do. For every one of them fell into a disagreement of opinion; some affir∣ming that the Emperours Proposal was good; others [thinking] it not conducive to their de∣sign. For some were one way affected towards the Books of the Ancients, others another. Nor could they any longer agree amongst themselves: and they dissented not only from other Sects, but those of the same Sect differed one from the other. Concordant malice therefore, like the tongue of those ancient Gyants, was divided, and their tower of mischief demolished. After the Emperour perceived their confused † 1.7 Dissention, and [was sensible] that they confided in dis∣putation only, and not in the Exposition of the Ancients; he betook himself to a second project. And orders every Sect to d 1.8 set forth [and de∣liver in] to him in writing a Draught of that Creed which they owned. Then, those [of every Sect] amongst them that were skilfullest and most eloquent, wrote their own opinion, making use of a great deal of caution and circumspection in their expressions. A day also was pitcht upon, whereon the Bishops of each Sect upon summons met at the Pallace. At which time were present Nectarius and Agelius, Prelates of the Homoöusian Creed; of the Arians, Demophilus; of the c 1.9 Eunomi∣ans, Eunomius himself; of those that embraced Ma∣cedonius's opinion, Eleusius [Bishop] of Cyzicum.

Page 336

The Emperour gave them a very kind reception at their meeting: and having received a Draught of the Creed in writing from every one of them, retired into a private apartment alone, where he prayed with much fervency, that God would give him his assistance, in order to an Election of the Truth. And having read over every one of the written Draughts of the Creed, he tore all the rest, (disapproving of them, in regard they introduced a separation of the Trinity) except the Homoöusian Creed only, which he commended and embraced. This was the rea∣son of the Novatians flourishing again, [and of their being permitted] to celebrate their sacred assemblies within the Cities. For the Emperour, admiring their consent as to the Faith, f 1.10 with those of his own opinion, gave com∣mand by [the promulga∣tion of] a Law, that they should securely enjoy their own Oratories; and that their Churches should have the same priviledges with g 1.11 those [Churches] of his own Faith. But, the Pre∣lates of the other Sects, by reason of their disagreement amongst themselves, were condemned and despised e∣ven by their own disciples. And being reduced to a desperation, and overwhel∣med with grief, they made their departure: and wrote Consolatory Letters to those of their own party, perswading them not to be troubled, because many relinquished them, and became adherents to the Homoöusian Creed. For many [they said] were called, but few chosen. Which expression they in no wise made use of, at such time as the greatest part of the people * 1.12 through force and fear became their favourers. But neither were the Professours of the Homoöusian Creed perfectly free from trouble and disquietude. For the affairs of the Antiochian Church caused a divi∣sion amongst those that were present at the Synod. For, the Egyptians, Arabians, and Cypriots † 1.13 ga∣thering together again, said that Flavianus ought to be expelled out of Antioch. But [the Bi∣shops] of Palaestine, Phoenice, and Syria stood up in defence of Flavianus. What conclusion this affair had, I will declare in its due place.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.