CHAP. X. How Agrippa, called also Herod, persecuting the Apostles, presently felt Divine vengeance.
BUt the Kings attempt to do violence to the Apostles remained not long unrevenged; for a chastizing Minister of divine justice pursued him: He therefore, soon after his bloudy plot against the Apostles, going down to Caesarea, as it is related in the Acts of the Apostles, and being there upon the great festival day dressed in a white and Royal garment, made an Oration to the peo∣ple from his lofty throne; and when all the mul∣titude gave a shout with loud acclamations at his Oration, as at the voice of God and not of Man, Sacred writ declares that he was immediately smit∣ten by an Angel, and was eaten up of worms and gave up the ghost. But the consent between Holy writ and the History of Josephus, in the account given of this strange thing is worthy of admiration. In which he, giving evident testimony to the truth in his nineteenth * 1.1 Book of Antiquities does plainly declare this wonderfull thing in these words thus,
The third year of his reign over all Judea was now compleated; when he went to the City Caesarea, heretofore called the Tower of Straton. There he exhibited shewes in honour of Caesar, knowing that a 1.2 Festival to have been instituted for the prosperity of him. Hereun∣to flockt a great multitude of those who were honoura∣ble and excelled in digni∣ty, throughout that whole b 1.3 Province. On the second day therefore of the shews, being clothed with Robes made all of silver admira∣bly wrought, he entred the Theatre early in the mor∣ning. When the silver of his Robes, shining by rea∣son of the beams the rising Sun cast on them made a wonderfull glistering, striking those who steadfastly looked on him with wonder and amazement, presently his flat∣terers, some from one place some from another, cryed out with voices most pernitious to him terming him God; and beseeching him to be propitious to them. Hitherto, said they, we have reverenced thee as a Man, but now we acknow∣ledge thee to be above mortal nature. But the King neither rebuked them, nor rejected their impious flattery, presently after looking up he espied an c 1.4 angel sitting over his head; whom he forthwith understood to be the cause of mis∣chief towards him, having d 1.5 heretofore been the foreteller of his prosperity. A pain that pierced his very heart immediately seized him. He had besides a griping all over his belly, which began with a vehement sharpness, and was continual and without intermission. Looking therefore upon his friends, I your God, says he, am now compelled to end my life; fatal necessity forthwith demonstra∣ting the falshood of your boasting acclamations even now uttered concerning me: I, who by you was stiled immortal, am now snatch't away by death. But that destinie is to be born with which God hath decreed. We have in no wise lived ill, and despicably, but in such splendor as was look't upon to be most fortunate. When he had spoken these words, he was spent with the vehemency of his pain. Being therefore presently carried into the Palace, a rumour was immediately spread abroad that the King was in imminent danger of his life; straightway the whole multitude with their wives and chil∣dren e 1.6 sitting upon spread sackcloth, after their coun∣try fashion, made supplica∣tions to God for the King. Every place was filled with wailings and lamentations. But the King lying in an High-bed-chamber, looked down upon them as they lay prostrate and could not refrain weeping. At length having been for five days space continually tormen∣ted with pains of his Belly, he died, in the fifty fourth year of f 1.7 his Age, and the seventh of his Reign. For first he reigned four years under Caius Caesar, having governed the Te∣trarchie of Phillip three years; in the fourth he had Herods Tetrarchie an∣next: the three last years of his Reign he passed un∣der Claudius Caesar.Thus far Josephus: wherein, as also in other passages, I much admire him, in that he agrees so exactly with Holy Scripture. But if any one should think that there is some disagreement about the name of the King; both the time and the action doe evidently shew that he was the same per∣son; so that either his name was changed by some mistake of the Transcriber, or else this King had, as many others have, two names.