Page 476
Isaaci Vossii Variarum Observationum Liber, at London, 1685. in Quarto.
MR. Vossius begins this Book with a Discourse upon the greatness of the Antient Roman City, upon which he has several Thoughts which appear incre∣dible to many Men; for he says, That in the time of Augustus, the Walls were above thirty thousand Paces round, al∣tho' they enclosed not that part of the City that was situated upon the Confines of Tyber, which contain'd twenty thou∣sand Paces. And if so, the Circumfe∣rence of Rome wou'd be above fifty thou∣sand Paces without the Suburbs. Our Author in taking them into the Compu∣tation, found that the whole contain'd 72 thousand Paces, in so much that its Area or Content was greater by 3/11 than that of Babylon, which was a square City of sixty thousand Paces about. Rome ap∣pears to us already of an excessive great∣ness, but what wou'd it be if we added to it that part beyond the Tyber, which has not yet been counted? Because they did not formerly look upon it as a part of the City. The Palace of Nero encompassed Rome on that side; and it was of so prodigious an extent, that Mr. Vossius did not believe that there was then any City in Europe so large. He durst not say positively that the Quarter on that side the River extended even to the Ocriculum for the space of 36 thousand Paces; but he shews, that it took up much Land upon the Ianicule, the neigh∣bouring Mountains, and along the way of Flaminius, which being that whereby Men entred in Triumph into the City, 'twas necessarily full of Houses.
He proposes some considerable Diffi∣culties, and answers them very learned∣ly. He says, amongst other things, that the Walls of Rome must be distinguished from the Pomaerium, which being at first without the City, was afterwards one part of it within the Walls, and the o∣ther without; because that those that enlarged the Walls, was also obliged at the same time to enlarge the Pomaerium, the Augures so managed the matter, that all which had this quality before preser∣ved it self. He also says, That when they made their City bigger, they pro∣portionably removed certain places, with∣out taking from them their Ancient Names. For Example, the Grove of the Muses, and the Cave of Egeria, or Numa, was often removed, being once but a little distance from the Gate of Capena, which in the time of this King was not very far from the middle of Rome. But after a while this Grove and this Cave were found at Aricia, near the outmost parts of the City, fifteen thou∣sand Paces from the place where the Gate of Capena anciently stood. This Observation may serve for an Answer to a Passage in Pliny, where it is said, That Rome was limited at the East by the Caprice of Tarquin the Proud; for if any wou'd infer from thence, That the Limits of the Town were only distant from the Center about two thousand Paces, he may be answer'd, That this distance which was effectively so once, is so encreased in proportion to the en∣largement of Rome; because the Monu∣ment which bears the Name of Tarquin, was always extended to the utmost bounds of the City. Our Author adds, That 'tis vainly alledg'd, that there's no Trace left at this Day of the prodigious Bulk of Rome, for (says he) if one wou'd find any Marks of it, he must dig sixty foot deep, and to find any of the Ruins of Nineveh or Babylon, which were built upon soft Foundations, he must dig two hundred foot deep.
What he says afterwards, is not less common, viz. He brings a long List of the numberings of the Roman People from the time of Servius Tullius, to the Year of Rome 667. The first Account gives 130000 Citizens, that of the Year 667 affords above 46000. In respect of the Inhabitants, 'tis hard to give a positive determination, because they were never reckoned; but our Author affirms they were of a far greater number than Lip∣sus believed; for if the proportion be∣tween the Slaves and Citizens, was the same as betwixt those of Rome, and A∣thens, where for 20000 Burgesses there were 400000 Slaves, it wou'd follow, that Rome contain'd 8000000 of Slaves, a greater number than any Kingdom of Europe whatsoever has in it. He assures us in another place, That before the Ty∣ranny of Sylla, the City of Rome by it self had as many Inhabitants in it, as the Moiety of Europe has at this day.
But to the Computation he brings, he supposes, that the City of Paris, and that of London, joyn'd together would fill an A∣rea of six thousand Paces Square. And that the City of Rome, with its Suburbs, and that Quarter beyond Tyber, wou'd take up twenty times a greater Square than those six thousand Paces. He sup∣poses also, that Rome was at least as well Peopled as Paris and London, and grounds his Opinion upon the Prodigious height of the Houses, as appears by Augustus taxing them at 70 foot apiece; Now we may well suppose here with those who are not carry'd away with the Multitude in their Computation, that there are not more than six hundred thousand Inhabi∣tants in each of those Cities that I have named. In another place he is not so liberal, he allows only that number to two Cities joyn'd together, he concludes this following Proposition, That there was in Rome fourteen Millions of Inhabi∣tants,