Seymour Duke of Somerset.
[28 H.8.]
OF this Family, which derive their de∣scenta from Sir Roger Seymor* of Evens∣minde•, in Com. Wilts. Knight (who marriedb Cecilie, one of the sisters and coheirs to Iohn Lord Beauchamp of Hacche, in Com. So∣merset) wasc Sir Iohn Seymour* of Wolf-Hall, in Com. Wilts. Knight. Which Sir Iohn, in 9 H. 8. (beingd then one of the Knights for the Body to that King) obtain'd a grante of the Constablewick of Bristol-Castle, to him∣self, and Edward* his son, in as ample manner as Giles Lord D'aubeney held the same. And▪ ha∣ving marriedfElizabeth the daughter of Sir Henry Wentworth of Nettlested. in Com. Suff. Knight, had issueg by her••hree sons; Edward, Thomas and Henry; and three daughters; 1. Iane, whom King Henry the Eighth made his third wife; 2. Elizabeth, first married to Sir Anthony Oughtred Knight, and secondly to Gregory Lord Cromwell; 3. And Dorothy to Sir Clement Smith Knight.
Which Edward* shortly afterwards came to high advancements. For, being a Knighth in 22 H. 8. he wasi also, at the same time, one of the Esquires for the body. And when King Hen∣ry, having cast his affections on the Lady Iane, his Sister (then a Maid of Honor to Queen Anne Bullen) made her his wife, he wanted not for any Titles of Honor, or other advantages, which, for her sake, that King could well effect. For, in 28 H. 8. at the solemnity* of her Marriage, he had the Title of Vicount Beauchamp conferr'dl upon him, and the heirs male of his body (by reason of his Descent from an heir fe∣male of that House, as is before observed) his patent bearing date at Terlyng, 5 Iunii. And upon the seventh of Iuly next following, was made Captainm of the Isle of Iersey, Sir Tho∣mas Vaux Knight, Lord Harrowden, then sur∣rendringn his trust in that command.
In 29 H. 8. upon the death of Sir Iohn Sea∣mour Knight (his father) he had Livery* of his Lands: and soon after that (the same year) being createdp Earl of Hertford, by by Letters Patents, bearing date 18 Oct. had a grant* of his Creation money, not out of the Revenues of that County (as was usual) but out of other profits. In 32 H. 8. uponr the building of a Fort at Ardres, and making a Bridge to the English-pale; which our Garrisons overthrew; and by reason whereof the French raised Forces under Monsieur de Bi•z; he was sent* over to dispute the limits of the English-Borders, with him and other Commissioners. And, in 33 H. 8. as Cousint and heir to Sir William Sturmy Kt, (that is to say, son of Sir Iohn Seamour Knight, son of Iohn Seamour Esquire, son of Iohn Seamour Esquire, son of Sir Iohn Seamour Knight; son of Maud, daughter and heir to Sir William Sturmy Knight) had Livery* of Sturmy's Lands.
In 34 H. 8. he was madex Lord great Cham∣berlain of England for life; and the same year •ccompanied* the Duke of Norfolk, lieute∣nant-general of the English Army (consisting of above Twenty thousand men) into Scotland. And, the next ensuing year, being made* Lieu∣tenant-general of the North, was senta thither with a powerful Army, as some say, to restrain the Incursions of the Scots: or ratherb upon a quarrel of unkindness, for their refusing an offer for the Marriage of Prince Edward to their young Queen. Upon the 13th of August 36 H. 8. King Henry beingc then at the siege of ••∣loine, he camed to him with divers Compa∣nies of Almaines, French, and others: And after the taking thereof, routed* an Army of Fourteen thousand French, which lay encamp'd o• the West-side that Town, beyond the Haven.
In 37 H. 8. the Scots making divers Incursi∣onsf upon the Borders (through the help of Five thousand Auxiliaries, brought* to them from France, by Monsieur de Lorges) he was sent* with Twelve thousand men into that Realme; where he destroyedi all the Towns up∣on the Middle-Marches; and passing thence to the West, made great spoilek in those parts.
About this time also, the French endeavour∣ingl to regain Boloine by some stratagem; and to that end, the Marshal de Biez coming mwith an Army to Port (a Town not far di∣stant) begining to buildn a Fort on this side the River, at the point of the Tower of Ordre; with Four thousand Foot, and seven hundred Horse, out of the neighbouring Garrisons, he for∣cedo their retreat to Hardel•: and in pursuit of him, kill'dp many, tookq two Brass guns, five of Iron, much Baggage, and Monsieur de Biez his own Armour.
In 38 H. 8: vponr that ill success, which the Earl of Surrey, then Governor of Boloine had, by his endeavour to intercept a Convoy of Victual, going to the French Camp; King Hen∣ry (who lov'd not to hear but of Victory) cau∣sing him to be remov'd,s put* this Earl, at pre∣sent, in his sted. Also, upon farther preparati∣ons made by the French, he was sentu over, with the Lord Admiral, and an Army of Nine thou∣sand, and three hundred men; whereof Fifteen hundred were Spaniards; and some other for∣reign forces.
Likewise, after • this, upon a motionx for Peace with the French, made by divers Princes; he was constitutedy the chief of our English-Commissioners, for the management of that Treaty. Whereupon, meetingz wi•h those on the other side, betwixt A•dres and Buisnes, a Peacea was concluded. And soon after this, King Henry lying on his death-Bed, he was con∣stitutedb one of his Executors; as also to be of Counsel to his son
Upon the death of King Henry (which hap∣ned upon the 28th of Ianuary, in the 38th of his Reign) he was by all the Council (the next day following) chosenc Protector to the young King Edward 6th, and on the tenth of February consti∣tutedd Lord Treasurer of England. And though he had the Titles of Vicount Beau∣champ, and Earl of Hertford formerly con∣ferr'd upon him (and the Issue male of his Bo∣dy) by King Henry the Eighth, as hath been al∣ready observed; nevertheless, being not a Ba∣ron of this Realm, he was by Leters Patent, bearing date 15 Febr. 1 E. 6 advanc'd* to that degree of honor; with limitationf thereof to the heirs male of his bod•, by Anne his wife; and for default of such issue, to Edward Seymou•Page 362 Esquire, his son by Katherine his first wife; and to the heirs male of the body of the said Ed∣ward. And, the next day following, was crea∣ted g Duke of Somerset, and to the heirs male of his body by the before-specified Anne. As also upon the seventeenth of February Earl Mar∣shal h of England, for life. Moreover, upon the 12th of March following, he had a Patenti for that great Office of Protector and Governor of the King and Realmes. And, upon the third of November next ensuing, a special grant,k that he should sit alone; and be placed at all times (as well in the King's presence in Parliament, as in his absence) upon the midst of the Bench or stool, standing next on the right hand the King's Seat-royal, in his Parliament Chamber.
Shortly after which he was sentl into Scot∣land with Ten thousand foot, and Six thousand horse, besides Thirteen hundred Pioneers, and Artificers, and fifteen Brass pieces of Ordnance: and on the third of September, made an hostile entrancem into that Realme; the designn there∣of being, to procure a Marriage betwixt King Edward, and the young Queen. But the Scots refusing the offer, gave Battelo to the English at Musc•eborough, where they receiv'd a migh∣ty overthrowp.
In 2 E. 6. by another Patent, bearing date 24 Dec. he was again constitutedqPro∣tector both of the King's person, and the whole Realme, during his minority.
Thus have we beheld his Rise. Now follows the story of his fall: but before I proceed to speak of that; I shall take notice of the Chara∣cter which an eminent Historianr gives of him;
He was a man (saith he) little esteemed, either for Wisdome, Personage, or Courage in Armes: but, being in favour with King Henry, and by him much imployed, was alwayes observed to be both Faith∣ful and Fortunate; as well in giving advise, as in managing a charge. About five years before, be∣ing Warden of the Marches against Scotland, the Invasion of James the Fifth was, by his direction, encountered, and broken at Selome-Mosse, where divers of the Scotish Nobility were taken prisoners. The next year after, he and the Earl of Warwick, with an handful of men, to speak of, fired Lieth, and Edenborough; and re∣turn•d by a leisurely march, forty four miles, through the body of Scotland. The year next ensuing, he invaded the Scotish borders, wasted Tividale, and the Marches, and deformed the Country with 〈◊〉 and spoile. The year then next following, be∣ing appointed to view the Fortifications upon the 〈◊〉 of Calais; he not only did that; but, with the hardy approach of Seven thousand Eng∣lishmen, raised an Army of One and twenty thou∣••••French, encamped over the River before Bo∣•ome;〈◊〉 their Ordnance, Carriage, Treasure, and Tents, with the loss only of one man; and re∣turning from thence by Land to Guisnes, won in his way (within 〈◊〉 and rescue of Arde) the Castle of Outing, commonly called the Red-pile.
The year next ensuing this, he invaded, and spoiled Picardy; began the Forts of Newha∣ven, 〈◊〉, and Bu•••ngberge; and so well applyed his endeavors, that in a few weeks, and 〈◊〉 his departure, they were made tenable. Vpon th•se and other the like successes, his succeed∣ing 〈◊◊〉 esteemed alwayes, rather new 〈…〉 his only presence was reputed a a sufficient surety for an Army. And yet did he never rise hereby, either in haughtiness in himself, or contempt of others; but remained courteous and affable; choosing a course least subject to envy, be∣twixt stiff stubborness, and filthy flattery; never aspiring higher than to be the second person in State.
But, after all this Honor, Greatness, and pro∣sperous success in those his high imployments, comes now the Tragick part of his life (which was short and woful) to be spoke of; his abso∣lute ruine being both projected and perfected (as all our Historians do agree) by the subtile artifices of Iohn Vicount L'isle (afterwards Earl of Warwick and Duke of Northumberland) to make way for his own ambitious and aspi∣ring designs. Which when he had so far ac∣complisht, as, in all humane probability, he fully expected to have reapt the benefit whereat he aimed; the like fatal destruction, and no less sud∣den, fell, deservedly, on himself, as in its proper place is already she••d. And now to the mat∣ter, in the words of my Author.s.
This Duke had a Brother, called Thomas Lord Seymour of Sudley, Lord High Admiral of England (of whom I shall more particu∣larly speak by and by.) Which Thomas was a person of great courage, Courtly in fashion; in Personage stately; in voice magnificent, but somewhat empty of Matter. Both of them be∣ing so well affected to the King; that the one might well be term'd his Sword; the other his Target. The Duke greatest in favour with the People; the Lord Sudly most respected by the Nobility; both highly esteemed by the King; both fortunate alike in their advancements; both ruin'd alike by their own vanity and folly. Whilst these two Brethren held in amity, they were like two Armes, the one defending the other, and both of them the King: But many things did move together to dissolve their love, and bring them to ruine; first, their contrary dispositions; the one being tractable and milde; the other stiff, and impatient of a Superior; whereby they lived but in cunning concord, as Brothers glued together, but not united in grain. Much secret envy was borne against them, for that their new lustre did dim the light of men honoured with antient Nobility. They were openly minded, as hasty and soon moved; so, uncircumspect and easie to be ruin'd. By these, the knot, not only of Love, but of Nature, between them was dis∣solv'd; so much the more pity, for that the first cause proceeded from the pride, the haughty hate, the unquiet vanity, of a Mannish, or rather of a Develish woman.
For the Lord Sudley had taken to wife Kathe∣rine Parre, Queen Dowager to King Henry the Eighth, a woman adorn'd with many excellent virtues, especially humility, the beauty of all other. The Duke had taken to wife Anne Stanhope, a woman for many imperfections into∣lerable; but for pride, monstrous. She was ex∣ceeding both subtile, and violent in accomplish∣ing her ends, for which she spurned over all re∣spects both of Conscience and Shame. This woman did bear such invincible hate, first against the Queen Dowager, for light causes, and wo∣mens quarrels; especially for that she had pre∣cedency of place before her, being wife to the greatest Peer in the Land; next to the Lord Sudley for her sake; that albeit the Q. Dowager Page 363 dyed by Child-birth; yet would not her malice either die or decrease; but continually she rub'd into the Duke's dull capacity; That the Lord Sudley dissenting from him in opinion of Reli∣gion, sought nothing more than to take away his life; as well in regard of the common cause of Religion; as thereby, haply, to attain his place.
Many other things she boldly feigned, being assured of easie belief in her heedless hearers; alwayes fearful and suspicious (as of feeble spi∣rit) but then more than ever, by reason of some late opposition against him. Her perswa∣sions she cunningly intermixed with Teares; af∣firming that she would depart from him; as willinger to hear, both of his disgraces, and dan∣gers, than either to see the one, or participate of the other.
The Duke therefore imbracing this womans cousel, yeilded himself, both to advise and de∣vise for the destruction of his Brother. The Earl of Warwick had his finger in the busi∣ness, and drew others also to give, either fur∣therance or way to her violent desires; being well content she should have her mind, so as the Duke might thereby incur Infamy and Hate. Hereupon the Lord Sudley was Arrested, and sent to the Tower; and in very short time af∣ter, condemn'd by Act of Parliament: and with∣in few dayes after his condemnation, a Warrant was sent, under the hand of this his Brother (the Duke) whereby his Head was delivered to the Axe. His own fierce courage hastning his death; because equally balanced betwixt•••oubt and di•∣dain, he was desirous rather to die at once, then to linger long upon curtesie and in fear.
The Accusations against him contained much •rivolous matter. The Act of Parliament ex∣presseth the causes of his Attainder to be, the attempting to get the person of the King into his custody, and Governing the Realme. Also making much provision of Money and Victuall; and endeavouring to marry the Lady Elizabeth the King's Sister. Likewise, for perswading the King, in his tender age, to take upon him the rule and order of himself. But he was ne∣ver call'd to answer: so that, the Protestations which he made at the point of his death, and the open carriage of his life, did clear him in the opinion of many.
Hereupon a general hatred arose in the People towards the Protector, for being thus instru∣mental in the death of his Brother: whereby it was observed, that with his left hand he had cut off his right; many of the Nobility crying out upon him for a Blood-sucker, and a Mur∣therer▪ and that it was not fit the King should be under the Protection of such a ravenous Wolfe.
Besides all this, many well disposed mindes, conceived a very hard opinion of him, for causing a Church near Strand-Bridge, and two Bi∣shops Houses, to be pull'd down, to make a •eat for his new Building (called Somerset-house) in digging the foundation whereof, the Bones of many, who had been there buried, were cast up, and carried into the Fields. And because the stones of that Church, and those Houses were not sufficient for that work, the Steeple and most part of the Church of St. Iohn of Hierusalem near Smithfield, were mined and overthrown with Powder, and the stones carried thereto. So like∣wise the Cloister on the North-side of St. Pauls Cathedral; and the Charnel-house on the South∣side thereof, with the Chapel; the Tombes and Monuments therein being all beaten-down; the Bones of the dead carried into Finsbury-fields, and the stones converted to this Building; and it was confidently affirm'd, that for the same purpose he intended to have pull'd down St. Margarets Church at Westminster, but that the standing thereof was preserved by his fall.
The Earl of Warwick therefore spying this fit opportunity, drew to him no less than Eighteen of the Privy-Councel, to joyn with him against this Protector. Whereupon they withdrew from the Court, and fell to secret Consultations; walking in the streets of the City with many servants in new Liveries. Which so startled the Protector, that he sent Secretary Petee to them, in the King's name, to understand the causes of such their assembling; and to de∣clare unto them, that he would thank them for hating him, in case they did it in love to the King; intreating them, for the King's sake, if not for his safety, that they would forbear open shew of Hostility, and resort unto him peacea∣bly, that they might commune together as Friends. But in the mean time he Armed Five-hundred men (part the Kings, and part his own) rampier'd the Court-gates; caused many men to be raised, both by Letters and Proclamation, to aid the King; and the more to increase the present terror, remov'd the King, by night, from Hampton-Court to Wind•ore, with a Company more resembling an Army then a Train.
Hereupon the Lords at London took posses∣sion of the Tower; sent for the Lord Mayor and Aldermen of the City to Ely House, where the Earl of Warwick lodg'd; and there pre∣senting themselves secretly Armed, caused the Lord Rich, (then Lord Chancellor) to make a Speech to them. Wherein; first, laying open to them the Imperfections of the Protector, as want of Eloquence, Personage, Learning, or good Wit; and that nevertheless he was so peevishly opiniative, and proud, that he would neither ask, nor hear the advice of any, but was absolutely ruled by that obstinate and imperious woman, his wife; whose ambitious and mischievous will, so guided him in the most weighty Affaires of the Realm; that though he was Counselled by others what was best, he would do quite con∣trary, lest he should seem to need their advice. In general, he said, he was guilty of Bribery and Extortion; and that he had laid his hands upon the King's Jewells, and Treasure, left by his Father, which were known to be of an inesti∣mable value; and had given forth, that King Henry died so poor, as that, had he lived one quarter of a year longer, he had been utterly sha∣med.
Moreover, that he had, upon pretence of ne∣cessity, made Sales and Exchanges of the King's Lands; as also of Offices and Preferments, no∣thing regarding the worthiness of the person; erected a Mint at Dure•me-Place for his own private advantage; made sale of Colledges, and Chanteries; Levied Subsidies under colour of War; imbezelled the Kings Treasure; extorted Money by Loanes, yet left the King's Soldiers and Servants unpaid; buried much Treasure in Page 364 his sumptous Buildings. Adding, his unna∣tural endeavors for the death of his Brother; and his practises to dispatch such of the Nobili∣ty, as were like to oppose his mischievous drifts. Also his endeavor to win the Common people, by strained Curtesies, and Looseness of life. And, to make the French King his Friend, by betraying unto him the King's Forts beyond the Seas. Likewise, that he intended to pro∣cure a resignation of the King's Sisters Rights, and others who were intitled to the Crown, and entail the same upon his own issue. Urg∣ing the Citizens, upon all these confiderations, to joyn with the Lords of the Council, to take him away.
And the next day the Lords at London, dis∣patch'd a Letter to the Lords at Windsore, wherein they charged him with many disorders, both in his private Actions, and manner of Go∣vernment; requiring, that he would disperse the Forces that he had raised; withdraw him∣self from the King; and be content to be or∣dered by Justice and Reason. Hereupon, the King, fearing farther mischief, dissolv'd all his Companies, excepting his Guard; And the Pro∣tector sent Secretary Pet•e once more to the Lords at London, to perswade them, that for the Publick good, all either private grudges, or unkindnesses might be laid aside: but neither did he return, nor was there any Answer re∣turn'd from them.
After this, he wrote two Letters; one in his own name to the Earl of Warwick; the other, in the name of those Lords at Windsore, to the Lords at London: in both which, he so weakly complain'd, expostulated, intreated, and yeilded under their Hand, as it was sufficient to have breathed courage into any Enemy once declared against him.
Hereupon the Lords at London forthwith publisht a Proclamation, under the hands of Se∣venteen of them; wherein they charged the cau∣ses of all the calamities and losses, which had lately before hapned, and had cost the lives of many thousands of the King's good Subjects. Likewise the loss of divers Pieces beyond Sea, which had been won by the great Adventure of the late King's Person, and consumption of his Treasure, to have been through the evil Go∣vernment of this Protector: and desired, and in the King's Name, prohibited all subjects, from farther giving obedience to any of his precepts. Soon after the publishing whereof, they directed three Letters to Windsore; one to the King himself, another to this Protector, and a third to the Houshold. Which Letter to the Prote∣ctor was guilded with many smooth words; fair promises, and full of hope: But the other two, fouly setting forth his Obstinacie, Avarice, Ambition; his rash engagements into Wars in the Kings unsetled age and estate; his negligen∣ces▪ deceits, and all other insufficiencies before-mentioned.
Wherewith Sir Robert Wingfeild, Captain of the Guard, being sent to Windsore; he so well perswaded the King, both of the Loyal affecti∣on of the Lords towards him, and of their mo∣derate desires against the Protector (then pre∣sent) that he was remov'd from the King's per∣son, and a Guard set upon him, till the next day, when the Lords at London were appointed to be there. Who came accordingly, but the Earl of Warwick not with them, though all mo∣ved from him. Which Lords, coming before the King, repeated their former complaints, ad∣vising him to beware of such as were both Pow∣erful, Ambitious, Mischeivous, and Rich: Af∣firming, that it would be better security unto him, that this Power should be committed to many, who cannot so readily knit together in Will or in Action, as when the whole managery resideth in one: Whereupon this Duke (being no longer called Protector) was put into their hands, and commited to custody in Beauchamp's Tower, within that Castle; and the next day brought to London; where he rode through Holburne betwixt the Earls of Southamp∣ton, and Huntington, followed by Lords and Gentlemen to the number of Three hundred, all mounted on horsback: and at Sopher-lane, being received by the Lord Mayor, Sheriffs, Re∣corder, and divers Knights of note, with their Attendants, bearing Halberts, was convey'd to the Tower.
Where, having breath'd a small time, certain Lords of the Council were sent to him; who, after a short Preface, in such termes as hate and dissimulation could temper together, remem∣bring how great the Amity had formerly been between them▪ and of what continuance; Then acknowledging what Offices and Services he had done for the Common-wealth; yet enterlacing some errors and defects, wherewith they seem'd to reproach him; they presented to him certain Articles, as from the rest of the Privy-Council; desiring his p••sent Answer, whether he would acknowledge them to be true, or stand upon his Justification.
Which Articles were these;
1. That he took upon him the Office of Protector, upon express condition, that he should do nothing in the Kings Affairs, but by assent of the late King's Executors, 〈◊〉 the greatest part of them.
2. That, contrary to this condition, he did hinder Iustice, and subvert Laws, of his own authority, as well by Letters, as by other command.
3. That he caused divers persons, Arrested and Imprisoned for Treason, Murther, Manslaughter, and Felony, to be discharged, against the Laws and Sta∣tutes of the Realm.
4. That he appointed Lieutenants for Armies, and other Officers, for the weighty Affairs of the King, under his own writing and seale.
5. That he communed with Embassadors of other Realmes alone, of the weighty Matters of the Realme.
6. That he would taunt and reprove divers of the King's most honorable Counsellors, for declaring their advice in the King's weighty Affairs against his opinion: sometimes telling them, that they were not worthy to sit in Councill; and sometimes, that he needed not to open weighty matters to them: and, that if they were not agreeable to his opinion, he would discharge them.
7. That, against Law, he held a Court of Requests in his House, and did enforce divers to answer there, for their Freehold, and Goods; and did determine of the same.
8. That being no Officer (without the advice of the Councill, or most part of them) he did dispose of the King's guift for Money, grant Leases and Wards, gave Bishopricks, and made sale of the King's Lands.
Page 3659. That he commanded Alchimye, and multi∣plication to be practised, thereby to abase the Kings coyne.
10. That divers times be openly said, that the Nobility and Gentry were the only cause of Dearth, whereupon the people rose to reform matters of them∣selves.
11. That against the mind of the whole Coun∣cil, be caused Proclamation to be made concerning Inclosures, whereupon the people made divers In∣surrections, and destroyed many of the Kings Sub∣jects.
12. That he sent forth a Commission with Ar∣ticles annexed, concerning Inclosures, common High∣ways, Cottages, and such like matters; giving the Commissioners authority, to hear and determine those causes, whereby the Laws and Statutes of the Realm were subverted, and much Rebellion raised.
13. That he suffered Rebels to assemble, and lye armed in Camp, against the Nobility and Gentry of the Realm, without speedy repressing of them.
14. That he did comfort and encourage divers Re∣bells, by giving them money, and promissing them Fees, Rewards, and Services.
15. That he caused a Proclamation to be made against Law, and in favor of the Rebels; that none of them should be vexed or sued by any, for their offences in their Rebellion.
16. That in time of Rebellion he said, that he liked well the actions of the Rebels; and that the Avarice of Gentlemen gave occasion for the people to rise; and that it was better for them to die, than to perish for want.
17. That he said, the Lords of the Parliament were loath to reform Inclosures and other things; therefore the people had good cause to reform them themselves.
18. That after Declaration of the defaults of Baloine, and the pieces there, by such as did survive them, he would never amend the same.
19. That he would not suffer the Kings pieces of Newhaven and Blackness to be furnished with Men and provision; albeit he was advertised of the defaults, and advised thereto by the Kings Coun∣cil; whereby the French King was emboldned to attempt upon them.
20. That he would neither give authority, nor suffer Noblemen and Gentlemen to suppress Rebels in time convenients; but wrote to them to speak the Rebels fair, and use them gently.
21. That upon the fifth of October, (that pre∣sent year) at Hampton-court, for defence of his own private causes, he procured seditions Bills to be written in counterfeit bands, and secretly to be dis∣persed in divers parts of the Realm; beginning thus; Good people, intending thereby to raise the Kings Subjects to Rebellion and open War.
22. that the Kings Privy Council did consult at London, to come to him, and move him to reform his Government: But he hearing thereof, decla∣red by his Letters in divers places, that they were high Traytors to the King.
23. That he declared untruly, as well to the King, as to other young Lords attending his person, that the Lords at London, intended to destroy the King, and desired the King never to forget to re∣venge it; and required the young Lords to put the King in remembrance thereof, with intent to make Sedition and Discord, between the King and his Nobles.
24. That at divers times and places he said, That the Lords of the Council at London in∣tend to Kill me, but if I die, the King shall die, and if they famish me, they shall famish him.
25. That of his own head he removed the King so suddainly from Hampton-court to Wind∣sore, without any provision there made; that he was thereby, not only in great fear, but cast into a dangerous disease.
26. That by his Letters, he caused the Kings people to assemble in great numbers in Armor, after the manner of War, to his ayde and defence.
27. That he caused his Servants and Friends, at Hampton-court and Windsore, to be apparalled in the Kings Armor, when the Kings Servants and Guard went unarmed.
28. That he intended to fly to Iernsey and Wales, and laid Post-Horses and Men, and a Boat to that purpose.
Now albeit, saith my Author,t there was little doubt, but that some of these Articles were meerly devised; others inlarged, or wrest∣ed, or others inforced by odious interpretation; yet he subscribed with his own hand, that he did acknowledge his offences contained in them; and humbly upon his knees, submitted himself to the Kings Mercy. As also in like manner, intreated the Lords to be a means to the King, that he would conceive, that his offences did proceed rather from negligence, rashness, or other indisc•etion, than from any malicious thought tending to Treason, and that he would take some gracious way with him, his Wife and Children, not according to extremity of Laws, but after his great clemency and mercy. This was written with his own hand, 23 Dec. An. 3 Edw. Regis.
My Author also thus goeth on. To this I make no other defence; but intreat the Reader not to con∣demn him for perishing so weakly, and for that he who should have lost his Life to preserve his Honor, cast away both his Life and his Honor together.
Notwithstanding for that present, his Blood was respited; but he was stripped of his great Offices of Protector, Trasurer, and Marshall, lost all his Goods, and near two thousand pounds Lands.
After this, he sent Letters to the Lords of the Council, wherein he acknowledged himself much favoured by them, in that they had brought his cause to be finable; which although it was to him importable; yet as he never did intend to contend with them, nor in any action to justi∣fie himself; as well, for that he was none of the wisest, and might easily err; as for that it is scarce possible for any Man in great place, so to bear himself, that all his Actions in the Eye of Justice should be blameless: so he did then submit himself, wholy to the Kings Mercy, and their discretions, for some moderation; desiring them to conceive, that what he did amiss, was rather through rudeness, and for want of Judg∣ment, than from any malicious meaning; and that he was therefore ready, both to do and suf∣fer what they should appoint. Finally he did again most humbly upon his knees intreat pardon and favor; assuring them that they should ever find him so lowly to their Honors, and obedi∣ent to their Orders, as that he would thereby make amends for his former follies.
Which subjection of his, wrought such com∣passion towards him from the King; that he Page 366 was forthwith released from his Imprisonment; his Fines pardoned; his goods and lands restored, exeept such as had been given away; the ma∣lice of the Lords being either appeased, or their power not sufficient to resist.
Within a short time after which, he was en∣tertained and feasted by the King, with a great shew of favor, and sworn again of the Privy-Council; and a seeming perfect amity made be∣twixt him and the Lords: and that all might appear to be knit up in a comical conclusion, his Daughter was soon after joyned in Marriage with the Lord L'Isle, Son and Heir to the Earl of Uarwick, and the Earl himself madeu Lord Admiral of England, 3 Iunii, Ann. 1550. (4 E. 6.)
Butx these ill cemented affections continued not long firm, bursting out into open enmity the next ensuing year: insomuch, as he resolved to Murther the Earl of Warwick, then newly made Duke of Northumberland (as some re∣port) and to that end, under colour of a visit, came privily armed to his Lodging, attended by Seconds, where he found him in his Bed; but being courteously entertained, and with smooth Language, did not execute what he pur∣posed. Whereupon, at his departure, one* of the Company asking him whether he had done the feat; and he saying No; the party replyed, then you are undone.
Northum•erland therefore being now in title of Honor inferior to none,* and superiour to all in authority and power; could not restrain his haughty hopes of aspiring to an absolute command; but before he could level directly at his Mark, it was thought fit that this Duke should be taken away. Speeches were there∣fore spread abroad, that he had caused himself to be proclaimed King in divers Countries. Which though they were known to be false, yet the very naming him so to be, either as de∣sired by himself, or esteemed worthy by others, brought with it a distastful relish, apt enough to cause a suspition of truth.
After this, he was charged to have persuaded divers of the Nobility, to choose him Protector at the next Parliament. For which being questi∣oned, he neither held silence as he might, nor confidently denied it, but entangled himself in his doubtful tale. Sir Thomas Palmer, (a great Creature of Northumberlands) also affirmed, that being upon a Journey with him towards the North; in case Sir William Herbert, Master of the Horse, had not assured him, that he should receive no harm, he would have raised the peo∣ple; and that he had sent the Lord Grey before, to know who would be his friends. Also, that the Duke of Northumberland, the Marquess of Northampton▪ and the Earl of Pembroke, should have been invited to Banquet; and that if they had come slenderly attended, then to have been set upon by the way; if strongly, then that their Heads should have been cut off, at the place of their Feasting. He likewise far∣ther declared, that Sir Raphe Vane had two thousand Men in a readiness; that Sir Thomas Arundel had assured the Tower; that Seymour and Hamond would wait upon him; and that all the Horse of the Gens d' armes should be slain.
Hereunto Mr. Secretary Cecill added, that this Duke had sent for him, and said, That he suspected some ill meaning against him; and that thereunto he replied; If he were not in fault, he might trust to his Innocency; if he were, he had no∣thing to say, but to lament him.
Being advertised therefore, of these Informa∣tions; he forthwith defyed the Secretary by his Letter, then sent to Sir Thomas Palmer, to un∣derstand what he had reported of him; who de∣nied all that he had said.
Hereupon, after few days, coming to the Court somewhat later than usual, which was enforced as a suspition against him; he was after Dinner apprehended; and Sir Raphe Vane, being twice sent for fled. The day following likewise, his Dutchess was sent to the Tower; no Man grieve∣ing thereat, by reason that her pride and base∣ness of life, overballanced all pity. Sir Thomas Palmer being again examined, added to his former detection, that Gens d'arms, upon the Muster day should be assaulted by two thou∣sand Foot, under Sir Raphe Vane, and by an hun∣dred Horse of this Duke of Somersets; be∣sides his Friends, which should stand by; and besides the idle people, which were thought in∣clinable to take his part; that this done, he would run through the City, and proclaim Li∣berty, and in case his attempt did not succeed, he would go to the Isle of Wight or to Poole.
Crane confessed, for the most part as Sir Tho. Palmer had done; and farther added, that the Lord Paget's House was the place, where the No∣bility being invited to a Banquet, should have lost their Heads; and that the Earl of Arundel was made acquainted with the practice by Sir Michael Stanhope; also that it had been done, but that the greatness of the Enterprise caused delays, and sometimes diversity of advice. And far∣ther said, that this Duke once fayning himself to be sick, went to London, to assay what friends he could procure.
But here my Author addeth, that Crane, (who gave this testimony) was a Man; who having consumed his own estate, had armed him∣self to any mischief. Hamond also confessed, that the Dukes Chamber at Grenewich, had been strongly watched by night.
Hereupon, after a short abode in the Tower, he was brought to his Trial at Westminster, the Marquiss of Winchester, (then Lord Trea∣surer of England) sitting as high Steward un∣der a cloth of State, on a Bench mounted three degrees; the Peers in number twenty seven, sit∣ing on a bench one step lower; which were these, The Dukes of Suff. and Northumb. the Marquess of Northampt. the Earls of Derby, Bedford, Hun∣tington, Rutland, Bathe, Sussex, Worcester, Pem∣broke, and Vicount Hereford: the Barons Berga∣venny, Audley, Wharton, Evers, Latimer, Bo∣rough, Zouch, Stafford, Wentworth, Darcie, Stur∣ton, Windsore, Cromwell, Cobham, and Bray.
The charge against him consisting of five parts; 1. Of raising Men in the North parts of the Realm. 2. Of assembling Men to kill the Duke of Nor∣thumberland. 3. Of resisting his Attachment. 4. Of killing the Gens d'arms, and raising Lon∣don. And fifthly, of assaulting the Lords, and devising their deaths. To which he pleaded not guilty, and put himself upon Tryal of his Peers; denying, that he had ever any intent to raise Men in the North; but that upon some bruites apprehending a fear, he sent to Sir Wil∣liam Herbert to remain his Friend. Saying, that Page 367 he never determined to kill the Duke of Nor∣thumberland, or any other Lord, but spake of it only, and determined the contrary. And farther said, that it had been a mad entreprise with his hundred Men, to assail the Gens d'arms, consisting of nine hundred, when in case he had prevailed, it would nothing have availed the pretended purpose: and therefore, that this be∣ing fenceless and absurd, must needs discredit other matters, which might otherwise have been believed. Next, that at London he never projected any stir, but ever held it a good place for his security. And that for having Men in his Chamber at Grenewich, 'twas manifest he meant no harm; because when he might have done it, he did it not. Moreover, against the persons of them, whose Examinations were read against him; he objected many things, desiring they might be brought to his face; which in regard he was a person of dignity and estate, he deemed to be reasonable: speak∣ing much evil against Sir Thomas Palmer; and yet, in opinion of many, far short of the Truth.
Much it was urged, by the Kings learned Council, that some of the Crimes charged against him were Treason, and the other Felony: Ne∣vertheless, after many varieties in opinion, he was acquit of Treason, but by most voices found guilty of Felony; whereupon he had judgment to be hanged. Which he might have avoided, as most of our Historians do say, had he required the benefit of his Clergy, but upon better enquiry it will be found; that he was thus condemned by vertue of a Statute then in force, which made the conspiring the death of a Privy Councellor Felony, without the be∣nefit of Clergy.
Judgment therefore thus passing upon him, he craved pardon of the Duke of Northum∣berland, Marquess of Northampton, and Earl of Pembroke, for his ill meaning against them; making sute for his Life, in pity to his Wife, Children, and Servants, and payment of his Debts.
Hereupon, all means were made use of, to di∣vert the Kings thoughts from him, as well by Masques, Tiltings, as other delights; and some∣times calling him to serious affairs, wherein he took special pleasure. Sometimes also instancing to him, how dangerous a person he was; who having made away his only Brother, contrived the death of the chief Nobility. And where (said they) should this mischief have rested? would it have raged against all, and left the King only un∣touched? verily, having been alwayes both cruel and false, there would have been no end of his mis∣chief; therefore all his submissions, must now be taken for counterfeit and dissembled: but his Ava∣rice and Ambition once removed, the way will be laid open to Vertue and Merit.
Thus far my Author Sir Iohn Hayward, where∣unto I shall add, what*Godwin farther saith; That having since his Sentence of death, conti∣nued two Months in Prison; at length the vio∣lence of his Enemies, (notwithstanding the Kings desire to save him) drew him to the Scaf∣fold on Tower Hill, 24 Ian. An. 1552. (6 E. 6.) where having thus spoke to the Beholders, he suffered death.
Being by the Law condemned, I here willingly submit my self, by exemplary punishment to satisfie its Rigour. That God hath been pleased to grant me so long a preparative to my end, I humbly thank his eternal goodness: but in that he hath been far∣ther pleased to inspire me, with the knowledge of his Truth, and to make me an instrument for the propagation of the same, I can never sufficiently mag∣nify his Mercies. In this do I rejoyce; in this only do I triumph; beseeching him, that his Church in this Realm, being now reformed; according to the Institution of the antient Primitive, the Members thereof may conform their lives to the purity of its re∣ceived Doctrine.
More he would have said, but a strange Tu∣mult, and suddain consternation of the Assem∣bly interrputed him, which being passed over, he suffered with admirable constancy; neither by voice, gesture, nor contenance, shewing himself any way dejected, or moved at the ap∣prehention of death.
That his death was generally lamented is ma∣nifest, many there were, who kept Handkar∣chefs dipped in his Blood, as so many sacred Re∣liques. Amongst the rest a sprightful Dame, two years after, when the Duke of Northum∣berland was led captive through the City, for his opposition against Queen Mary; run to him in the Streets, and shaking out her bloody Han∣kerchief before him, said; Behold the Blood of that worthy Man, that good Vncle of that excellent King; which shed by thy treacherous machination, now, at this instant, begins to revenge it self upon thee.
As for his life, (saith Godwin) he was a pious, just Man, very zealous in point of Reformation, very sollicitous of the Kings safety; every way good and careful of the Weal publick; only a little tainted with the Epidemique of those times, who thought it Religion to reform the Church, as well in its exuberancy of means, as of su∣perstitious Ceremonies; whereof not a few of our Cathedrals to this day complain. Thus far Goodwin.
He had two Wives, the firsty called Kathe∣rine, Daughter and Co-heir to Sir William Fil∣lol of Woodland, in Com. Dors. Knight, by whom he had Issuez two Sons, Edward Seamour of Bery-Pomeric, in Com. Devon. and Iohn, the posterity of which Edward, do still remain in thole parts.
The second,aAnne Daughter of Sir Edward Stanhope of Shelford, in Com. Nott. Knight, by whom he had Issueb three Sons, Edward, afterwards Earl of Hertford, Henry, who Mar∣ried Ioane, Daughter to Thomas Earl of Nor∣thumberland, and another Edward. And six Daughters; Anne fifth married to Iohn Dudley, (commonly called Earl of Warwick) eldest Son to Iohn Duke of Northumberland, and afterwards to Sir Edward Vmpton, Knight of the Bath, Margaret and Iane, who died unmar∣ried; Mary, first Wedded to Andrew Rogers, eldest Son to Sir Richard Rogers of Brianston, in Com. Dors. Knight, and after to Sir Henry Payton Knight, Catherine died unmarried, and Elizabeth, who became the second Wife to Sir Richard Knightley of Fausley, in Com. North. Knight.
¶I should now go on with the Descendants of this great Duke:* but considering that Tho∣mas his younger Brother, had no Issue, shall first take notice of what is most memorable of him.
Page 368In 32 H. 8. upon that triumphal justing at Westminster, on May day, (being then a Knight) he* was one of the Challengers to all comers, from, France, Flanders, Scotland and Spaine. And in the Month of Iuly, 35 H. 8. accompaniedc Sir Iohn Wallap, as Marshal, with six thousand Men, which were sent over in aid of the Emperor against the French. In which year being one of the Gentlemen of the Kings Privy Chamber, he was also constituted d Master of the Ordnance for life, with the fee of two hundred Marks per annum, and eight pence per diem, for two servants attending him in that Office. And in 37 H. 8. obtained a Grante of a certain Mansion, scituate in the Strand, without Temple-Bar, then called Hamp∣ton-Place, alias Bath-place, parcel of the possessions of William late Earl of Southamp∣ton) but since coming to the Earls of Arundel, for that respect called Arundel-House.
In 38 H. 8. he was Knight Marshal of thole Foprces sent into France, under the conduct of Eeward Earl of Hertford; as also one of those, whom the King upon his death-bed appointed Assistants to his Executors,f especially in matters of great consequence, and in 1 E. 6. 16 Feb. was advancedg to the dignity of a Baron of this Realm, by the Title of Lord Seymour of Sudley, as also madeh Lord high Admiral of England.
But soon after this he fell. Foru having Married Catherine Parr, the Widdow of the de∣ceased King; great emulation hapned betwixt Anne the Wife of his elder Brother, Edward Duke of Somerset, (at that time Protector of the King and Realm) the Duke being a per∣son mild, free, open and no ways malicious; this Thomas, (then Admiral) naturally turbu∣lent fierce and ambitious; conceiving himself of the two, the fitter for publick Government; whereupon, presently after the death of King Henry, through his own over-weaning conceits, he resolved to add a luster to his good parts, by Marrying the Lady Elizabeth, as yet indeed fearce Marriageable: but Protector wisely considering how rash and perillous this Project was, frustrated that design. And by his after Marriage with Catherine, a most beautiful and noble Lady, abounding with Wealth befitting her dignity; most Men were confident, that the gulf of his vast desires would have been sa∣tisfied.
But the Law whereby he was condemned, (though peradventure enacted by strength of •action) will manifest the contrary. Having therefore thus fortified himself with Money and Friends, and deeming his Brothers lenity to be 〈◊〉; he began to behold him with the eye of contempt, and to cast about how to dis∣pos•ss him of the Saddle; and (being of like de∣gree in consanguinity to the King) to enjoy the seat himself. To the furtherance of which pro∣ject, he held it conducible, secretly to villifie and traduce the Protectors actions; to corrupt the Kings servants, (especially if in any de∣gree of favor) by fair words, and large promi∣ses; by degrees to assure himself of the Nobi∣lity, to secure his Castle of Holt, with a Ma∣gazin of warlick provision; but above all, to take care for Money, the nerves of War, and assurance of Peace.
T••se things having been ordered with exact diligence, and for supply of coyne, the Ex∣chequer mightily pilled, he unmasked himself to some of the Nobility; signifying his intent of setling himself at the Stern, by forcible seising on the Kings person. Nay his madness so trans∣ported him; that to one of them, conditional∣ly that his assistance were not wanting to the advancement of his designs, he promised that the King should marry his Daughter.
In the mean time, the Queen his Wife, being in September, (2 E. 6.) delivered of a Daugh∣ter, died in Child Bed; but not without sus∣pition of Poyson: for after her death, he more importunately sought the Lady Elizabeth than ever; eagerly endeavoring to procure her con∣sent to a clandestine Marriage, (as was that with the deceased Queen) and not untill after the Nuptials, to crave the assent of the King, or Lords of the Council. But this his project be∣ing opportunely discovered, and a Parliament assembled; he wasx by the authority thereof, committed to the Tower; and without any trial condemned. Shortly after which, the Parlia∣ment being on the fourteenth of March, An. 1549 (3 E. 6.) dissolved, he was on the sixth day after, publickly beheaded; having first ve∣hemently protested, that he never willingly did, either actually endeavor, or seriously intend any thing against the person of the King, or the State. Thus far Godwin.
¶I now come to Edward,* the eldest Son to Edward Duke of Somerset, by Anne his se∣cond Wife, upon whom his chiefest honors; as also divers Lands of great extent were entailed.
This Edward being dispossessed of all, by the Attainder of his Father, in that Parliament of 5 & 6 E. 6. so continued until the first year of Queen Eliz. But then, through the especial grace and favor of that Queen (being a Knighty) he was, by Letters Patent, bearing date 13 Ian. in the first year of her Raign, advancedz to the degree of a Baron of this Realm, by the Title of Lord Beauchamp, as also to the Dignity of Earl of Hertford.
That which I farther find most memorable of him is, that he Marrieda the Lady Catherine Grey, Daughter to Henry Duke of Suffolk, (who was of near alliance in blood to the Queen, and had been formerly Weddedb to Henry, the el∣dest Son to William Earl of Pembroke, but lawfully repudiated:c) And that she being dis∣cerned to be great with child, was in 5 Eliz. committedd Prisoner to the Tower of London, though she acknowledgede her self to be his law∣ful Wife. Likewise, that he being then recal∣led f out of France, (having thither gone with the Queen leave) and owningg his Mar∣riage with her, was also there imprisonedh And that the Archbishop of Canterbury, and others, being made choyce of to examine the business, and to determine therein; no witnesses of the Marriage being produced within the limited time, gave Sentencei that it was unlawful; and the carnal copulation betwixt them unjustifiable: as also, that both of them, for their transgression therein, should endure due punishment.
Moreover, that shortly afterwards, being de∣livered k of her first begotten Son, in prison, and after that, of another,l having corrupted m her keeper; Edward Warner, Lieutenant of the Tower, was put outn of his place, and im∣prisoned▪ and he himself censuredo in the Star Page 369 Chamber, upon these three points; First, for that he had vitiated a Maid of the Royal Blood: Next, that he had broke Prison; And lastly, that he had lain with her again.
Also, that to this he answered;p that, having lawfully married her, and the Prison-doores be∣ing open, he came to her in her sadness, to com∣fort her, and pay his Conjugal Debt. Never∣theless he was finedq at Five thousand pounds, and kept prisonerr for the space of nine years. Nor was she set at liberty, but there, continued s till her death.
Hereupon I shall add, what I have heard related from persons of great credit; which is, that the validity of this marriage, was afterwards brought to a Tryal at the Common-Law; where the Minister who married them being present, and other circumstances agreeing, the Jury (whereof Iohn Digby of Coleshill, in Com. Warr. Esquire, was the Fore-man) found it a good Marriage.
This Earl lived to be an aged man; and, in An. 1605. (3 Iac.) was sent Embassadort to the Arch-Duke for confirming a Peace. By the before-specified Lady Catherine his wife, he had issueu three sons; Edward, called Lord Beau∣champ; Thomas, who took to wife Isabell the daughter of Edward Onley of Catesby, in Com. Northampton, Esquire, and died without issue; and another Edward. As also Catherine a daugh∣ter, who died young. He had likewise two other wives;x first Frances, sister to Charles Earl of Notingham; and lastly Frances daughter to Thomas Vicount Howard of Bindon; but by neither of them any issue: And, departing y this life ... April, An. 1621. (19 I•c.) was buriedz in the Cathedral Church at Sa∣lisbury.
Which Edward Lord Beauchamp (his eldest son) in 6 Iac. obtained Lettersa Patents; grant∣ing, that he, and the heirs-male of his body, im∣mediately after the death of Edward Earl of Hertford (his father) should be Barons of Par∣liament, and have place and voice there: As also other Lettersb Patent, bearing date 14 Maii the same year, for the enjoyment of the Title of Earl of Hertford, in reversion, after his (the said Edward Earl of Hertford's) death. And, having marriedcHonora▪ daughter to Sir Ri∣chard Rogers of Brianston, in Com. Dors. Knight, had issued by her three sons; viz. 1. Edward, who married Anne, daughter to Robert, Earl of Dorset; and had issue by her Edward a son, and Anne a daughter, who died young; 2. Sir Wil∣liam Seamour Knight, and Sir Francis Seimour Knight. And one daughter, called Honora, mar∣ried to Sir Ferdinando Dudley Knight of the Bath, son and heir apparent of Edward Lord Dudley.
But this Edward, Lord Beauchamp diede in his Father's life time (viz ... Aug. An. 1618. 16 Iac) And so didfEdward his eldest son: In so much as, upon the death of Edward Earl of Hertford his Father, Sir William Seimour* Knight, the second son, succeededg him in his Honors: and marriedh two wives; first, the La∣dy Arabella, daughter to Charles, son to Mathew Earl of Lenox; by whom he had no issue And afterwards the Lady Frances, daughter of Robert Earl of Essex, sister and coheir to Robert〈◊〉 brother.
In An. 1640. (16 Car. 1.) this William, in consideration of his eminent merits, being advan∣ced h to an higher pitch of Honor, by the Title of Marquess of Hertford (as by His Majesti•s Letters Patents, bearing date 3 Iunii appear∣eth) was thereupon constituted Governor to the Prince: and faithfully adhering to that King (of blessed memory) at such time, as through the influence of a prevalent Party in the late Long Parliament, divers Armies were raised against him in most parts of this Realm, under certain plausible pretence was made* Lieutenant-Gene∣ral of all his Forces in the Counties of Wilts. South. Dorset, Somerset, Devon, and Cornwall. Moreover, upon the third of Iune, An. 1643. he was elected Chancellor of the fa∣mous University of Oxford; and the same year made Groom of the Stole.
And, living to see the happy Restoration of our present Soveraign King Charles the Second; was, by a special Act,i in that Parliament be∣gun at Westminster 25 April in the 12th year of his Reign, restored to the Title of Duke of Somerset, by a Repeal of that Act of 5 & 6 Edw. 6th, for the Attainder of Edward Duke of Somerset, his Great-Grandfather. After which, upon the 24th of October the same year, he departed this life, and was buried at Great-Bed∣wind, in Com. Wilts.
By the Lady Frances his wife, he had issue five sons; William and Robert, who lived till the age of Twenty years, and then died unmarried; Henry, who took to wife Mary, the daughter to Arthur Lord Capell, and died at the age of Twen∣ty eight years, in his father's life time; Edward, who died in his infancy; and lastly Iohn. Also four daughters; Arabella, who died unmarried; Frances; first married to Richard Vicount Moli∣neux; secondly to Thomas Earl of Southamp∣ton (Lord High Treasurer of England) and lastly to Conyers Darcie, son and heir to Conyers Lord Darcie, and Conyers; Mary to Heneage Earl of Winchelsey; and Iane to Charles Lord Clifford of Lansborough, son and heir to Richard Earl of Burlington.
Which Henry (the third son) so deceasing in his father's life time; had issue, by the said Mary his wife, one son called William;* and three daughters; viz. Frances and Mary who died in their Infancies, and Elizabeth. So that William his son, surviving his Grandfather, succeeded him in his Honors; but died 12 Dec. An. 1671. unmarried, and was buried at Bedwind. Whereupon the Lord Iohn his Uncle succeeded him.
Which Iohn married Sara•, daughter of Sir Edward Alston Knight; and departing this life ... Aprilis, An. 1675. without issue, was buried in the Cathedral at Salisbu∣ry.
¶Having thus deduced the Line of this noble Family down to this present; I come lastly to Sir Francis Seymour▪ Knight, the third son to Edward Lord Beauchamp, son and heir to Edward Earl of Hertford.
This Sir Francis Seamour* upon the 19th of February, 16 Car. 1. was advancedk to the dig∣nity of a Baron of this Realme, by the name of Lord Seamour of Tro•bridge, in Com. Wilts. And, having married twice; first Frances, the daughter and heir to Sir Gilbert Prinne of Al∣lington, in Com. Wilts. Knight, by whom he Page 370 had issue one son, called Charles; and Frances a daughter, married to Sir William Ducie of Tort∣worth, a Knight of the Bath, and Baronet; and secondly Catherine, daughter to Sir Robert Lee of Bilsley, in Com. War. Knight, by whom he had no issue; departed this life 12 Iulii, An. 1664. and was buried at Bedwind.
Which Charles* succeeding him, married two wives; first Mary, daughter and sole heir to Thomas Smith of Soley, in the Parish of Chil∣ton, in Com. Wilts. by whom he had issue one son called Edward, who died in his Infancy: and two daughters; Catherine, who died un∣married, and Frances now wife of Sir George Hun∣gerford of Cadenham, in Com. Wilts. Baronet. He secondly married Elizabeth, daughter to Wil∣liam L. Allington (of Horshet, in Com. Cantab.) by whom he had issue five sons; Francis, Willi∣am and William, who died in their Infancies; and Francis and Charles now living. As also two daughters, Elizabeth, who died young; and Honora still surviving.
This Charles Lord Seamour died in August, An. 1665. To whom succeeded Francis,* his eldest surviving son, who was born 17 Ianua∣ry, Anno 1657. and by the death of the before specified Iohn, Duke of Somerset without issue, doth now enjoy that Title.
Monumental Inscriptions in the Chancel of the Parish-Church of Grat-Bed∣wynd in Wiltshire, where the chief of this Noble Family do lie interred.
Here lyeth Entombed the worthy Sir John Sey∣mour of Wolphall Knight; who, by Margery his wife, daughter to Sir Henry Wentworth Knight (from whom the now Lord Wentworth is descended) had six sons, and four daughters; to wit John, who died unmarried, Edward Duke of Somerset, Earl of Hertford, Vicount Beau∣champ, and Baron Seymour, Vncle to King Ed∣ward the Sixth, Governor of his Royal Person, Pro∣tector of all his Dominions and Subjects, Lord Trea∣surer and Earl Marshall of England. (Which Duke married Anne, daughter of Sir Edward Stanhope Knight, by Elizabeth his wife, daughter of Sir Fouke Bourchier Lord Fitz-warren, from whom the modern Earls of Bath are descend∣ed;) Sir Henry Seymour Knight, who married Barbara, daughter of Thomas Morgan Esquire; Thomas Lord Seymour of Sudley, High Ad∣miral of England, who married Katherine Queen of England, and widow of King Henry the Eighth, one other John, and Anthony, who died in their infancy; Jane Q. of England, wife to King Henry the Eighth, and Mother of King Edward the Sixth; Elizabeth, first married to Sir Henry Ughtred Knight, after to Gregory Lord Crom∣well, and lastly to John, Lord St. John of Basing, afterwards Marquess of Winchester; Margery, who died in her infancy; and Dorothy, married to Sir Clement Smith Knight.
This Knight departed this life at Sixty years of age, the 21 day of December, An. 1536. and was first buried at Easton Priory-Church, amongst 〈◊〉 of his Ancestors, both Seymours and Stur∣myes. Howbeit, that Church being ruined, and thereby all their Monuments, either wholly spoiled, or very much defaced, during the Minority of Edward Earl of Hertford, son to the said Duke; the said Earl, after, as well for the dutiful love he beareth to his said Grandfather, as for the better continu∣ance of his memory, did cause his Body to be remo∣ved, and here to be entombed, at his own cost and charge, the last day of September, 1590. in the 32d year of the most happy Reign of our Gracious Sovereign Lady Queen Elizabeth.
Upon a Brass plate on a Grave-stone in the same Chancel.
Here lieth the body of John Seymour, son and heir of Sir John Seymour, Knight, and of Margery, one of the daughters of Sir Henry Wentworth Knight. Which deceased the 15th day of July, in the year of our Lord 1510. On whose Soul Jesu have mercy; and of your Charity say a Pater No∣ster, and an Ave.
Upon another Gravestone, there; under which Edward Lord Beauchamp, Father of William late Duke of Somerset, lieth buried.
