Page 101
CHAP. VI.
Two principall Texts of Scripture alledged by Protestants to prove it's sufficiency, and against Traditions; answered.
1. COme we now to consider a while those Texts of Scripture pretended by Prote∣stants to be so expresse, uncontroulable and pressing, as to justifie them from blame in not only opposing the former evident quota∣tions for Traditions, but in dividing from and condemning all Antiquity that taught the con∣trary, and not onely so, but relyed upon Tra∣dition alone in severall points confessed by them not to be visible in Scripture, and yet con∣demn'd, anathematized and utterly vanquish∣ed severall Heretiques, who thought it a suffici∣ent warrant to be dispensed from severall do∣ctrines taught, and practises continued in the Church, because the Scripture was silent in them.
2. Of all others the most considerable Text of Scripture alledged by Protestants, and most prized by them as efficacious to prove its perfe∣ction, & sufficiency to be an intire Rule of Faith is this speech of S. Paul to Timothy, (1 Tim. c. 3. v. 16. 17) Omnis Scriptura divinitius inspirata, utilis est, &c. All Scripture divinely inspired is pro∣fitable for teaching, for arguing, for reproving and for instructing in righteousnesse, that the man of God may be perfect, instructed to every good worke. Here, say they, it is apparent that S. Paul ac∣knowledges Scripture to be profitable for all kindes of spirituall uses, teaching, arguing, &c.