Land-Mead, and so derives his Title by Grant by Copy: the Issue was upon the Traverse, Ab∣sque hoc quod infra manerium praed. talis habetur con∣suetudo quod quilibet tenens custumarius, &c. have used to have Common, &c. prout, &c. Here is no Custom alledged, because it did not ap∣pear in Pleading, That the place where the taking was supposed to be, was within the said Manor, and no Custom of the Manor can ex∣tend out of the Manor, but he ought to pre∣scribe in the Manor. Note, he ought to have pleaded, That the place in which, &c. was par∣cel of the Manor, and then the Plea had been good, Hob. p. 286. 1 Brownl. 172. Roberts and Young.
Plaintiff in Replevin rejoyns by Custom of all the Copyholders of Blackacre, in the Manor of D. used to have Common in A. to which the Avowant demurred, because he should have prescribed in the Lords name, A. be∣ing out of the Manor; but the truth being that A. was anciently parcel, and lately se∣vered by the Lord, this destroys not the Com∣mon, Per Cur. But the Copy-holder ought to prescribe specially, That Talis consuetudo suit, till such a day, and that after the Lord granted over, &c. as on change of a Corporation in Lutterell's Case. 1 Keeble 652. Davy and Watts.
The Case was, The King was seized of a Manor, where there were divers Copy-holders for Life, and was also seized of 8 Acres of Land in another Manor, in which the Copy-holders have used, time out of mind, &c. to have Common; and after the King grants the Manor to one, and the 8 Acres to another; and a Copy-holder puts in his Beasts into the 8 Acres: And in Trespass brought against him by the Patentee of the 8 Acres, he pre∣scribes, That the Lord of the Manor, and all