Copy-holder dyes, Lord admits a Stranger, the Heir may enter, and upon a re-entry, main∣tain Trespass without Admittance, Noy, p. 172. Simpson and Gillion. Vide Admittance.
Action on the Case against the Lord, lyes not for non-Admittance.
A Copy-holder in the Eye of the Law, is but Tenant at the Lords Will; and if the Lord will not hold Court, he hath no remedy to compel him but by order in Chancery, Cro. Jac. p. 368. Ford and Hoskins: No Action on the Case by a named Successor.
Surrendror may have an Action on the Case for not admitting, but not the Surrendree, 2 Keb. 357. Quaere.
The Demandant in a Pleint in nature of a real Action, recovereth the Land erroneously, with remedy for the party grieved; for he cannot have the Kings Writ of faux Judgment, in respect of the baseness of the Estate and Tenure, being in the Eye of the Law but a Tenant at Will, and the Freehold being in ano∣ther; yet he shall have Petition to the Lord, in nature of a Writ of faux Judgment, and there∣in assign Errors, and have remedy according to Law, Co. Lit. 60. And if there be cause, the Judgment may be reversed.
Tenant by Copy shall not have Assise against his Lord (as Tenant in ancient Demesn shall have) because he hath no Frank-Tenement, 4 Rep. 21. but he shall be relieved in Equity, Tothil, p. 108.