Where the Lord shall take advantage before Present∣ment, or not.
*Presentment is not of necessity, but for the Lords better Instruction of the Title, and he may, if he will, take advantage of the For∣feiture before Presentment, Cro. El. p. 499. in East and Harding's Case. And therefore the distinction of Coke's Copy-holder is frivolous (except the Custom is so) though as for those Offences which by common presumption the Lord him∣self cannot have notice without notice given, are usually presented, as if a Copy-holder com∣mit Felony or Treason, or be Outlawed or ex∣communicate, a Presentment seems necessary that the Lord may have the profits of his Copy-hold Land. So if a Copy-holder alien by Deed, or do a thing notorious (as cutting down and selling of Trees of the Copy-hold Land by the Tenant,) its not material whether it be presented by the homage or not, 3 Keb. 641. Pascal and Wood's Case. The presentment is to give notice to the Lord, and not to intitle him, and he may take notice if he will, Lach. p. 227.