A defence of Mr. John Cotton from the imputation of selfe contradiction, charged on him by Mr. Dan. Cavvdrey written by himselfe not long before his death ; whereunto is prefixed, an answer to a late treatise of the said Mr. Cavvdrey about the nature of schisme, by John Owen ...

About this Item

Title
A defence of Mr. John Cotton from the imputation of selfe contradiction, charged on him by Mr. Dan. Cavvdrey written by himselfe not long before his death ; whereunto is prefixed, an answer to a late treatise of the said Mr. Cavvdrey about the nature of schisme, by John Owen ...
Author
Cotton, John, 1584-1652.
Publication
Oxford :: Printed by H. Hall for T. Robinson,
1658.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Cawdrey, Daniel, 1588-1664. -- Independency further proved to be a schism.
Cawdrey, Daniel, 1588-1664. -- Inconsistencie of the independent way.
Schism -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A34675.0001.001
Cite this Item
"A defence of Mr. John Cotton from the imputation of selfe contradiction, charged on him by Mr. Dan. Cavvdrey written by himselfe not long before his death ; whereunto is prefixed, an answer to a late treatise of the said Mr. Cavvdrey about the nature of schisme, by John Owen ..." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A34675.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 17, 2024.

Pages

The 17th Contradiction is thus set forth.

17. Visi∣ble Saints though they be Hypo∣crites in∣wardly, are the matter of a visible church. Mr. Hook. part. 1. p. 14. 15.17. You say Saints in outward Profession are the matter of a Con∣gregationall Church: we judge that reall Saints uttering in Discourse the Brea∣things of the Holy Spirit, and experi∣ences of conversi∣on, interested in a stricter conversation to be the matter. Dr. Holmes Epistle to Way cleared. pag. 4.Mr. Bartlet speaketh something (this lan∣guage) Can there be Ability for spirituall & holy services, where the spirit is not yet given? Can there be communion between light and Darknesse? Can they edify one another in the Faith, that have not the work of Faith wrought in them? Modell. p. 57. See more pag. 103.

Ans. What Mr Hooker's Judgment

Page 71

was, is expressed in that first Columne: what mine own, is declared, and I hope, cleared in the Holynesse of Church-mem∣bers. What Dr Holmes and Mr Bartlet doe further require in it, they Declare what Church-members ought to be de ju∣re, especially in their first constitution, rather then what they are, or are wont to be de facto, especially in their Declen∣sion. Againe I see Mr Bartlet speaketh in opposition to the members of the Pa∣rish Churches, who are in many places Ig∣norant, loose, profane and scandalous li∣vers, who are not indeed visible Saints, pag. 56.

It is true there is some work of the Spirit, where ever there is a visible Saint. But the Spirit giveth many Gifts to the edification of others (as to Judas and De∣mas) which often doe not reach to the Regeneration of him that Receiveth them.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.