Argumentum anti-normannicum, or, An argument proving, from ancient histories and records, that William, Duke of Normandy, made no absolute conquest of England by the Sword, in the sense of our modern writers being an answer to these four questions, viz. I. Whether William the First made an absolute conquest of this nation at his first entrance?, II. Whether he cancelled and abolished all the confessor's laws?, III. Whether he divided all our estates and fortunes between himself and his nobles?, IV. Whether it be not a grand error to affirm, that there were no English-men in the Common Council of the whole Kingdom?
About this Item
Title
Argumentum anti-normannicum, or, An argument proving, from ancient histories and records, that William, Duke of Normandy, made no absolute conquest of England by the Sword, in the sense of our modern writers being an answer to these four questions, viz. I. Whether William the First made an absolute conquest of this nation at his first entrance?, II. Whether he cancelled and abolished all the confessor's laws?, III. Whether he divided all our estates and fortunes between himself and his nobles?, IV. Whether it be not a grand error to affirm, that there were no English-men in the Common Council of the whole Kingdom?
Publication
London :: Printed by J.D. for Mat. Keinton, Jonath. Robinson, Sam. Sprint,
1682.
Rights/Permissions
To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
Subject terms
William -- I, -- King of England, 1027 or 8-1087.
Great Britain -- History -- William I, 1066-1087.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A33624.0001.001
Cite this Item
"Argumentum anti-normannicum, or, An argument proving, from ancient histories and records, that William, Duke of Normandy, made no absolute conquest of England by the Sword, in the sense of our modern writers being an answer to these four questions, viz. I. Whether William the First made an absolute conquest of this nation at his first entrance?, II. Whether he cancelled and abolished all the confessor's laws?, III. Whether he divided all our estates and fortunes between himself and his nobles?, IV. Whether it be not a grand error to affirm, that there were no English-men in the Common Council of the whole Kingdom?." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A33624.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 10, 2025.
Pages
descriptionPage iv
The First Question.
Whether William, Duke of Normandy,
(who was afterwards William the
First) got the Imperial Crown of
England by the Sword, and made an
* 1.1Absolute Conquest of the Nation at
his first entrance?
AS you have stated the Question,
Sir, and desire to know what is
my Opinion of it; with submission to
others, better informed, and who
are more able to maintain the Truth of
those Principles I proceed upon, than
my self, I shall return you this modest
Answer, as my Sence and Judgment
in the Point, viz. That I cannot con∣clude
descriptionPage v
in the Affirmative, for these se∣veral
constraining Reasons.
1. That William laid a far greater
stress upon his Claim and Titles to
this Kingdom, than ever he did upon
his great and mighty Conquest, will be
very plain and evident, if you please
but to consider with me these follow∣ing
Particulars.
1. In that before his Conquest, when
the People had chosen Harold, the Son
of Earl Godwin for their King, after
the Death of Edward the Confessor,
and had put aside Edgar Atheling, by
right of Blood and Inheritance entit∣led
to the Crown: This
Norman Duke made his
loud Complaints of the In∣juries
done him, in not elect∣ing
him, for he was* 1.2 Cosen
German to the Confessor,
who died† 1.3 without Issue;
and therefore pretended
that the Right truly devol∣ved
upon him. But, it
seems, as ill luck would have
it, this Duke they knew to
descriptionPage vi
be a Bastard, and neither the Saxon
Law, nor the Norman Custom, could
help him in such a Case, and so that
Title did him but little good. Well,
what therefore was to be his next
Work? Why,
2. Truly his Pretence was then,
That the Confessor had designed him
for his Successor,* 1.4 and by his last Will
had bequeathed this Kingdom to him;
And this was confirmed by the con∣sent
of the Nobility, and principally
of Harold himself: and hereupon con∣sidering
how Harold had trickt him,
and set the Crown on his own Head,
he sends over several Ambassadors,
with Commission to require him to
remember the Oath he had formerly
made to the said William in the time of
his Extremity, when he was his Priso∣ner
in Normandy; Which was, That he,
the said Harold, should assist him in the
obtaining of the Crown of England, if
ever Edward died without Issue.
3. And receiving but unkind Re∣turns
from Harold,* 1.5 by way of Answer
to his Demands, which thus the Histo∣rian
relates, De Regno addebat prae∣sumptuosum
fsuisse, quòd absque Generali
Senatus & Populi conventu & Edicto,
descriptionPage vii
alienam illi haereditatem juraverit;
That
as for him to take an Oath to deliver
up the Inheritance of any Realm, with∣out
the general consentand
allowance* 1.6 of the Senate
and People, could not but
be a great piece of pre∣sumption, yea, altho' he
might have just title so to
do;† 1.7 wherefore it was an
unreasonable Request of
the Duke now to require
him to renounce the King∣dom,
in which he was so well setled
to the good liking and content of
his People.
This Norman Duke, not
to be his own Judg, refers himself to
the Pope (then Alexander the second)
to decide the Matter, and so resolved
that the infallible Chair should deter∣mine
who had the Justest Title to the
Crown and Kingdom, Harold or Him∣self.
And the good old Gentleman
(who would not be behind-hand with
him in civility for so great a kindness,
as was the Appealing to him, and so
flattering him with a Judicatory Power
over Princes) easily was induced to
pronounce sentence on William's be∣half.
descriptionPage viii
But all these blustering Pretences of
nearness in Blood, (which it seems his
Son Henry thought to be the best flower
in his Garland, when he
* 1.8 calls himself the Son of
William the Great, (pray,
Sir, be pleased to observe,
it is not of William the Con∣queror)
Qui Edwardo Regi
Haereditario Iure successit in
Regnum,* 1.9 Who succeeded
to King Edward in the Kingdom, by
Right of Inheritance) or the Confes∣sor's
bequest of the Crown to him. Or
lastly, the Pope's definitive Sentence
in William's favour. All these bluster∣ing
Pretences of his, I say, availed but
little with Harold; and therefore you
must think, it could not but incense
the Duke of Normandy very greatly,
so that he had now a just cause of open
quarrel against Harold, for the Reasons
you have heard: And thereupon con∣vening
his Parliament, or Assembly of
three Estates, which consisted
of the Clergie, Nobility,* 1.10and
Commons;* 1.11the Nobility, in
fine, promised to serve him,
and the Clergie and People to
aid him with Mony, according
descriptionPage ix
to their several Abilities, and such offers
as they made, were forthwith set down
in writing by a Secretary there present.
So that being thus supplied, and assi∣sted
with several other of his Friends,
he makes for England; and was no
sooner arrived at a place in Sussex, cal∣led
Pevenessey, (now Pemsey) and got
well on Land, but, by his Proclama∣tion,
he declared upon what Occasions
he thus entred the Realm; and so
preparing to give Harold Battle, he
hereby seemed as if he would have all
the World to know, his Quarrel was
more Personal than National. But
this I will speak more particularly and
largely to, when I come to mention
some of the Charters he made after he
was established King.
And as Perjury seldom or never e∣scapes
unpunished; so here was a visi∣ble
Instance of the Divine Justice up∣on
Harold for his breach of Oath and
Covenant to the Duke; for in the
Battle of Hastings he met with his Re∣ward, losing both his Crown and his
Life at once, and leaving William to
finish the day with Victory, over those
that were yet resolved to dispute the
Cause with him.
descriptionPage x
And now being rid of his stubborn
Enemy, and in the heat of the Chase
got to London, he possessed himself of
that Kingdom which he pretended was
his own by Right before from the Ti∣tles
we have already mentioned. Yet
however it was in no such haughty
and insulting way, as many boast of,
and would gladly have their unwary
Readers to believe, upon their bare
Credit and Testimony; but he chose
the more grateful and complying Arti∣fices
of a Courtier, and setled himself
in it by a kind of mutual Agreement,
and express compact, as now I hope
will be clearly demonstrated by what I
shall offer to you after this his (pre∣tended
absolute) Conquest. For,
1. Tho' he was victorious over his
great Adversary Harold, yet if he had
been an absolute Conqueror, (as hath
been of late so vigorously asserted by
our Modern Writers) what urgent ne∣cessity
was there for him, or how did
it stand him in such mighty stead, still
to keep himself armed with the afore∣said
Titles, that so he might have the
more colourable pretence of Right and
Justice on his side, in laying a legal
Claim to this Imperial Crown? For,
descriptionPage xi
me-thinks, if he had a full possession
upon such a forcible entry, as is pre∣tended,
this had been a stronger Title
than any thing else he could have al∣ledged:
for how could, or durst, a
vanquished, enslaved Nation, dispute
with him, when he rode triumphing
on their Backs, and had lashed them
into an entire submission of vassalage?
But,
2. Let us see the manner of this
first King William's Coronation; and
whether or no he did not take an Oath
at the same time, which was, in sence
and substance (if not just in the
words themselves) the very same with
that which the Ancient Saxon Kings
used likewise to take upon their Co∣ronations.
And for your full satis∣faction
herein, I shall give you the pa∣rallel
of them both together, and be∣gin
first with
The Oath of either King Edward,* 1.12
or King Ethelred, (for Dunstan
crowned both of them at King∣ston)
about the Year 970.* 1.13
descriptionPage xii
This writing,* 1.14 punctually to a Let∣ter,
corresponds with that Writing
which Dunstan the Arch-bishop deli∣vered
to our Lord the King at King∣ston,
that very day of his Coronation;
and did then forbid the King, that
thenceforth he should make any other
Oath, than that which he had made
at the Holy Altar, or what the Bishop
should dictate then unto him.
In the Name of the Holy Trinity,* 1.15 I
do promise three things to Chri∣stian
People, and my Subjects.
The Oath of the
Saxon Kings at
their Coronation.
The Oath which
William the First
took at his Co∣ronation.
1. 'That I will
peaceably govern
the Church of
God, and the Peo∣ple
of my King∣dom.'
1. That he would
defend the Churches
of God, and all their
Pastors.* 1.16
descriptionPage xiii
2. 'That I will
utterly interdict
Rapines,* 1.17 and all
Injustice to all
Orders of Men.'
2. That he would
govern all People
that were his Sub∣jects
with Iustice,
and with that pru∣dent
care which be∣came
a good King.
3. 'That I do
promise,* 1.18 and will
command, That
in all Judgments,
Justice and Mer∣cy
shall be ming∣led
together, to
the end, that God,
who is the Omni∣potent
Judg of
the World, and
ruleth over all,
may be pleased,
out of his infinite
Compassion, to be
propitiously good
and merciful to us
all.'
3. That he would
both enact, and him∣self
keep, right Law,
and to the utmost of
his Power, would
interdict all Ra∣pines,
and false
Iudgments.
4. And he ad∣ded
one Article
more to the Oath,
than was in that of
the Saxon Kings;
and it was extra∣ordinarily
necessa∣ry
to be done, re∣bus
sic stantibus, and
that was, Quod
aequo jure Anglos
& Francos Tracta∣ret,
descriptionPage xiv
* 1.19 'That Christian
King who shall
observe these
things, shall de∣servedly
acquire
all earthly Ho∣nour;
moreover
the everlasting
Lord God shall
take Compassion
on him, as well
in this Life, as that
which is Eternal
and Endless.'
This Oath too
he took at the Al∣tar of St. Peter,
before ever he was
Consecrated, and
the Clergie and
Laity were equally
Parties and Wit∣nesses:
After which
he was Anointed
and Crowned by
Aldred Archbishop
of York; for Sti∣gand
the Arch-bi∣shop
of Canterbury,
was not admitted
to that Office, be∣cause
of some de∣fect
in his Investi∣ture.
descriptionPage xv
But if he shall do con∣trary
to what he promised
God,* 1.20 thenceforth he shall
daily decline, and his Sub∣jects
shall fail in their Al∣legiance,
and every thing
will be turned from bad to stark
nought, unless in time he reforms the
Errors of his Ways.
Meditate often with
thy self,* 1.21 that thou shalt
one day bring thy whole
Flock before the Tribunal
of God, whose Shepherd
thou art here ordained,
and therefore often consi∣der
with thy self, and look forward
how thou hast kept those whom
Christ with his own dear Blood, hath
formerly redeemed.
It is the Office of an A∣nointed
King to judg no
Man unrighteously;* 1.22 to
protect Widdows, Or∣phans
and Strangers; to
interdict Robberies; to
punish Whoredoms; to
separate and utterly to ex∣tirpate
descriptionPage xvi
all incestuous Persons; to a∣bolish
and cut off Witches and En∣chanters;
to banish Parricides and
perjured Persons out of his Domini∣ons;
to comfort the Poor with
Almes.
To call Grave,* 1.23 Sober,
and wise Men to counsel
and advise him.
To chuse just and good
Men for his Ministers and
Officers,* 1.24 because whatso∣ever
illegal Actions they
shall commit (under his
Authority) he must, at the Day of
Judgment, give an account for.
And the reason of all this is evi∣dent,
both from the Laws of God and
Man; the King is Debitor Iustitiae to
all his People, to rule and govern them
by Law:* 1.25Which, as his late Majesty
said, is the Inheritance of every Subject,
and the only security he can have for his
Life and Estate.* 1.26 Ad hoc autem creatus
est & electus, writes Bracton, ut Iu∣stitiam
faciat Vniversis: and that dum
facit justitiam Vicarius est Regis aeterni,
descriptionPage xvii
Minister autem Diaboli, dum declinet ad
injuriam. Henry the Third, upon a
Charter granted by his Father King
Iohn, and confirmed by himself, de∣clares,
Qui vero id quod dictus Pater
noster eis per Chartam suam concessit,* 1.27 &
nos postmodum annuimus infringere ne∣quaquam
volumus, sicut nec de jure de∣bemus;
much less a Coronation Oath.
Edward the first tells the Pope, upon
a Message sent him, That he could not
answer without consulting his Parlia∣ment;
and gives this for his Reason,
Iurejurando in Coronatione nostra pre∣stito
sumus adstricti,* 1.28 quod Iura Regni
nostri servabimus illibata, nec aliquid,
quod Diadema tangat, Regni ejusdem
absque ipsorum requisito consilio facie∣mus.
Observe, lastly, that Edward the
Third, that famous Conqueror of two
Kings, the Scottish and French, hath
left recorded to Posterity a definitive
Sentence and Judgment in this Point,
as an indisputable rule of Right and
Justice;
That he ought,* 1.29 and was bound by
his Coronation Oath, to keep the
Law of the Realm.
descriptionPage xviii
This Law of the Realm,* 1.30 or Land,
was looked upon, in the judgment of
these Parliaments, as* 1.31the Law of An∣cient
Time,† 1.32 of old Time used, and
* 1.33the Old Law; whose Age made it
the more venerable, and gave an ad∣dition
of honour to it.
Well, having thus shewn you the
Coronation of King William the First,
and given you the Solemn Oath he at
the same time took, even before his
Consecration, that so he might give all
possible satisfaction to the English, of
his resolving to rule accordingly;
and also having made it plain, that it
was the same in substance with that the
Ancient Saxons took before him; I
shall now descend briefly to set before
you some of his own Charters, as like∣wise
some of William the Second's, and
of Henry the First's, his Children, and
succeeding Kings; and from them
evidence to you, I hope demonstra∣bly,
that it was not so much his Con∣quest
he relied upon, when he was
setled in this Imperial Throne, as his
claim to the Crown of England, Iure
Hereditario, by Right of Inheritance.
And for the proof of this, be pleased
descriptionPage xix
to accept of these ensuing Instan∣ces.
1. In Nomine Patris,* 1.34 & Filii, &
Spiritus Sancti, Amen. Ego Williel∣mus
Dei Gratia Rex Anglorum, Hae∣reditario
Iure Factus.
2. In Nomine Patris,* 1.35 & Filii, &
Spiritus Sancti, Amen. Ego Williel∣mus
Rex Anglorum Haereditario Iure
Factus.
3. In nomine Sanctae & individuae
Trinitatis,* 1.36 Ego Willielmus Dei Gratia
Rex Anglorum, notum facio omnibus,
tam posteris quam praesentibus Archie∣piscopis,
Episcopis, Abbatibus, Co∣mitibus,
Baronibus, & omnibus ••ide∣libus
Francis & Anglis, Quod cum in
Angliam venissem, & in sinibus Ha∣sting
cum excercitu applicuis••em con∣tra
hostes meos, qui mihi Regnum
Angliae injustè conabatur auferre.
4. In ore gladii (saith William the
First's Charter)* 1.37 Regnum adeptus sum,
Anglorum devicto Haroldo Rege cum
suis Complicibus, qui mihi Regnum
cum providentia Dei destinatum &
beneficio concessionis Domini, & Cog∣nati
mei gloriosi Regis Edwardi con∣cessum
conati sunt auferre, &c.
descriptionPage xx
Come we now to his Second Son,
William Rufus.
5. Willielmus Rex Anglorum,* 1.38 Wil∣lielmo
Vicecomiti Filio Baldewini, &
omnibus Baronibus suis & Ministris,
qui habitant in Devonescira, Salutem.
Notifico vobis, quod mea condonati∣one
Ecclesia beati Olavi Regis, & Mar∣tyris
à Monachis belli aedificata, in ho∣nore
beati Nicholai, quam cum omni
terra quae pertinet ad Ecclesiam supra∣scripti
Martyris meo privilegio, vide∣licet
Literis & Sigillo, liberam facio, &
ita liberam & quietam per omnia cum
saca & soca, & thol & theam, & in∣fangenetheof,
& warpeni, & murdro,
& omnibus consuetudinibus, & operi∣bus
& auxiliis, sicut Pater meus libe∣ram
fecit Ecclesiam Sancti Martini de
bello, ubi hostem devicit, & ubi Coro∣nam
Regni haereditariam sibi bellando
adquisivit. T. Walchelino Wintoni∣ensi
Episcopo & Rogero Bigot apud
Wintoniam.
descriptionPage xxi
From William Rufus pro∣ceed
we to his Brother,
Henry the First.
And, saith he,
6. In Nomine Sanctae & Individuae
Trinitatis,* 1.39 Patris, & Filii, & Spiritus
Sancti, Anno Incarnationis Dominicae
MCVIII Indictione ... Anno vero
Pontificatus Domini Paschalis Papae
secundi ✚, Regni quo{que} mei simili∣ter
✚, Ego Henricus providente di∣vina
clementia Rex Anglorum & Nor∣mannorum
Dux, Willielmi Magni Re∣gis
Filius, qui Edwardo Regi Haeredi∣tario
Iure successit in Regnum, &c.
7. Again,* 1.40 Ego Henricus Dei Gra∣tia
Rex Anglorum, Filius Magni Re∣gis
Willielmi, qui beatae memoriae Ed∣wardo
in Regnum Successit.
8. To give you one Charter more.* 1.41
The words of that of Henry the First, to the Abby of Westminster, are, Pro
memoria Edwardi Cognati mei, qui
Patrem meum liberos{que} illius in Regnum
suum adoptivos haeredes instituit.
descriptionPage xxii
And thus have I given you, as it
were, a three-fold Cord (not easily to
be snapt asunder) to bind hard my
Assertion, and to convince those, who
will not suffer themselves to be over∣run
by an obstinate Prejudice, or cap∣tivated
by a byass'd Interest, that our
first William, when he came in, gained
not such an absolute Uictory as is pre∣tended,
over this Nation, (for when he
came in, he had not subdued the fifth
part of it) but came to the Crown by
the Election and Consent of the Cler∣gy
and People. And, foedus pepigit,
he made a Solemn Covenant with the
English, to observe and keep those
Laws, which were bonae & approbatae,
& antiquae Leges Regni.
And this, Sir, is what I shall endea∣vour
clearly to make out to you in my
Answer to your Second Question.
Notes
* 1.1
For England thus much I dare speak, and under the rule of Modesty protest, That sithence the V∣niversal Con∣quest of Wil∣liam, who first commanded and imposed Tribute upon this Land, (for Conquerors may command) Tribute and Subsidie have been as justly, both by the Law of God, and the Law of Nations, paid in England, as in Jewry; yea, and justly continued, as a remembrance of a Conquest. Dr. Pulbec Pandects of the Law of Nations, c. 10. p. 69. One Blackwood wrote a Book, which concluded, That we are all Slaves by reason of the Conquest. Vid. Mr. Pety••. Misc. Parl. p. 66. And t•• is Position is maintained by an Anonimus Author, in his full and clear Answer to Mr. Pety••'s Ancient Right of the Commons of England asserted. Pag. 35. in the Margin.
Edward the Confessor was Son to Ege••••ed K. of England by Emma, Sister to Rich.••. Duke of Normandy, who was Grandfather to Duke William; so that K Edward and Duke William were Co∣sen Germans once removed, as this farther shews you.
Richard 1.
Richard 2. Emma.
Robert. Edward.
William.
Edward married Edith, the Daughter of E. Godwin; but whether upon a vow of Chastity, or up∣on impotency of Nature, or upon any hatred to her Father, or suspicion against her self (for all these Causes are alledged by several Writers of those Times) he forbore all private Familiarities with her.
Hoc Scripto, de litera ad li∣teram, descrip∣tum est ad scriptum illud, quod Dunsta∣nus Archiepis∣copus tradebat Domino no∣stro Kingsto∣niae, ipso illo die quo Con∣secratus erat in Regem; at{que} illi interdice∣bat ne ullam sponsionem daret praeter sponsionem illam, quam depo∣suerat in Altari Christi, quemadmodum Episcopus illi dictaret.
3. Me promis∣surum & man∣daturum in omnibus Judi∣ciis, Justitiam & Misericordi∣am; ut nobis omnibus, pro¦insinita sua miseratione, propitius sit, Clemens ac Misericors Deus, qui vi∣vit & regnat, &c.
Christianus Rex, qui haec observaverit, sibi promere∣bitur honorem mundanum; quinetiam illi Deus aeternus miserebitur tam in hac vi∣ta presenti, quam in AEter∣na illa, quae nunquam de∣ficit.
Ac si irritum fecerit quod Deo erat promissum, tum deinceps egregie verget in pejus, mox quidem in popu∣lo suo; & omne demum quicquid sit, convertetur in pessimum.
Hoc tecum saepe meditare, quod debeas in Dei Judicio gregem proferre & sistere, in quem Pastor in hac vita constitutus es; & prospice quomodo conservasti quod Christus Sanguine suo olim redemit.
Justos sibi in Ministros constituere; quia quicquid ••psi injustum fecerint ejus (Autoritate) universi il∣lius rationem tenetur ille reddere in die Judicii.