The five days debate at Cicero's house in Tusculum between master and sophister.

About this Item

Title
The five days debate at Cicero's house in Tusculum between master and sophister.
Author
Cicero, Marcus Tullius.
Publication
London :: Printed for Abel Swalle ...,
1683.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A33161.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The five days debate at Cicero's house in Tusculum between master and sophister." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A33161.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 1, 2024.

Pages

(r) We would have all good men to be always Happy.] That is in a State of Happiness in every condition; having a Title to the paternal Providence of God upon his Promise. Had man persevered in Primitive Righteousness; his Body would have been passible, and the operativeness of external Agents no less efficacious; so that his security must have been in the Divine Protection from harmful Casualties, and supply of needful Enjoyments. When there is argu'd from perfect Vertue, to compleat Happiness, the Divine Favour and Bounty must necessarily be included; for when we say Ver∣tue is its own reward, it is not intended that the Vertuous have their Labours for their Pains. Complacency of mind in fulfilling a Law, ariseth from the Sense of our having pro∣moted the ends of it in mutual Preservation; and conse∣quently our own; or in having acquir'd the good Graces of the Law-giver by Obedience; but to solve the doubt, why ever it should go ill with the Good, as it is often seen to do; we must partly discount for the Defects of Goodness here, and consider temporary Evils in such, order'd for the bettering of the mind.

(s) Nor the Teachers of us both.] Antiochus and Aristus.

(t) Nor those Ancients, Aristotle.] These were Doctors of the Peripatetick Chair. Aristotle considering that man is made up of Soul and Body, which requires Necessaries and Conveniencies of Life, when he was in quest of the Good of Man, concluded it to be conjunctly in the Mind, together with the Body and external Circumstances. Health and

Page 287

competent subsistence all men desire, and Aristotle defineth that to be good, which all men desire. To undervalue the Benefits of God, who is Good and doth Good, restrains Prayer, and suppresses Gratitude; as in the Tenet of Aristo holding all other things, besides Vertue, indifferent; but how then can the good man ensure his Happiness? These Goods he pursues ordinately, useth with Moderation, and wants without Impatience; he can be no otherwise self∣dependent, than by linking his Will to the ever-blessed Will of a Superior Wisdom. Zeno deny'd bodily Inflictions and Misfortunes to be evil, from ignorance of their being Pe∣nalties for the Violation of the Divine Law; but to the truly Good their Nature is chang'd, their Evil taken away, and they made serviceable for Good.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.