The five days debate at Cicero's house in Tusculum between master and sophister.

About this Item

Title
The five days debate at Cicero's house in Tusculum between master and sophister.
Author
Cicero, Marcus Tullius.
Publication
London :: Printed for Abel Swalle ...,
1683.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A33161.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The five days debate at Cicero's house in Tusculum between master and sophister." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A33161.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 7, 2024.

Pages

SECT. XXVI. The pretended benefit of the other Passions dis∣prov'd.

BUT further Emulation is useful, Detraction, and Pitty. Why should one pitty another, rather than succour him, if he is able? Cannot we be bountiful without pitty? Sure we are not bound to pull upon our selves Discontents in favour of others, but to relieve others of their Discontent, if we are able. Again, what use can there be in de∣tracting from another, or emulating him with that vitious Emulation which resembles Rivalship; since he that emulates is afflicted at anothers good which himself hath not; on the other side, he that

Page 247

detracts is afflicted at anothers good, because that other hath it as well as himself. Who can approve that, if one would have any thing, he should ra∣ther choose to sit down in Discontent, for being without it, then put himself upon attempts to gain it? for as to the affecting to engross it to himself, it is the highest pitch of madness. Again, who can justly commend Moderation in bad? for who is there, in whom Lust and Covetousness is, but must be lustful and covetous? in whom Wrath, but Wrathful? in whom Anxiety, but Anxious? in whom Fear, but Fearful? Do we therefore judge, that a Wise man is Lustful and Covetous, and Wrathful, and Anxious, and Fearful? of whose excellency much may be said in as large and co∣pious manner as one please; but most succinctly thus, Wisdom is the knowledge of Divine and Hu∣mane things, and perceiving the cause of every particular one, which hath this effect, that it imi∣tates the Divine Perfections, and esteems all Humane Occurrents inferior to Vertue. Now did you give it for your opinion, that disturbance was incident to this temper, as to the Sea, which is subject to the Winds? What is there able to disturb so great Gra∣vity and Constancy? is any unexpected or sudden turn? What such can befall him, to whom no con∣tingency of Humane Life is unpremeditated? For as to their saying, what is excessive should be retrench'd, what natural left; I demand what can be natural, which also may be excessive; for all these things sprout from the Roots of Mistakes, which must be torn and wholly pluck'd up, not pared and lop'd off.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.