SECT. I.
ARTIC.
- 1 WHy the Nature of Motion, which de∣served to have been the subject of the first speculation, was reserved to be the Argu∣ment of the Last, in this Physiology.
- ibid.
- 2 An Epicurean Principle, of fundamental con∣cern to motion.
- 436
- 3 Aristotles Position, that the first Principle of motion, is the very Forme of the thing mo∣ved; absolutely incomprehensible: unless the Form of a thing be conceived to be a certain tenuious Contexture of most subtile and most active Atoms.
- ibid.
- 4 A second Epicurean Fundamental, concerning motion: and the state of the Difference betwixt Epicurus, Aristotle, and Plato, touching the same.
- 4••7
- 5 Epicurus's Definition of motion, to be the Re∣move of a body from place to place; much more intelligible and proper, than Aristotles, that it is the Act of an Entity in power, as it is such.
- 438
- 6 Empericus his Objections against that Defi∣nition of Epicurus: and the full Solution of each.
- 439
- 7 That there is motion; contrary to the Sophisms of Parmenides, Melissus, Zeno, Diodorus and the Scepticks.
- 441