SECT. II.
ARTIC.
- 1 THe First Cardinal Difficulty.
- 37
- 2 The Desert space in the Tube argued to be an absolute Vacuum coacervate, from the im∣possibility of its repl••tion with Aer.
- ibid.
- 3 The Experiment praesented in Iconism
- 38
- 4 The Vacuity in the Desert Space, not praevent∣ed by the insinuation of Aether.
- 40
- 5 A Paradox, that Nature doth not abhor all vacuity, per se; but onely ex Accidenti, or in respect to Fluxility.
- ibid.
- 6 A second Argument against the repletion of the Desert space by Aether.
- 41
- 7 The Vacuity of the Desert space, not praevent∣ed by an Halitus, or Spiritual E••••lux from the Mercury: for three convincing reasons.
- 42
- 8 The Authors Apostacy from the opinion of an absolute Coacervate Vacuity in the desert space: in regard of
- ibid.
- 9 The possibility of the subingression of light.
- ibid.
- 10 Of the Atoms or insensible bodies of Heat and Cold: which are much more exile and pene∣trative then common Aer.
- 43
- 11 Of the Magnetical E••••lux of the Earth: to which opinion the Author resigns his Assent.
- 44
- 12 No absolute plenitude, nor absolute Vacuity, in the Desert Space: but onely a Disseminate Vacuity.
- ibid.