XVII. Of the Differences between the KING and the Two Houses, in point of CHURCH-GOVERNMENT.
TOuching the Government of the Church by Bishops, the common Jealousie hath been, that I am earnest and resolute to maintain it, not so much out of Piety, as Policy and reason of State.
Wherein so far indeed reason of State doth induce Me to approve that Government above any other, as I find it impossible for a Prince to preserve the State in quiet, unless he hath such an influence upon Church-men, and they such a dependance on Him, as may best restrain the seditious exorbitancies of Ministers tongues; who with the Keys of Heaven have so far the Keys of the Peoples Hearts, as they prevail much by their Oratory to let in or shut out both Peace and Loyalty.
So that I being (as KING) intrusted by God and the Laws with the good both of Church and State; I see no reason I should give up, or weaken by any change, that power and influence which in right and reason I ought to have over both.
The removing Bishops out of the House of Peers (of which I have elsewhere given an account) was sufficient to take off any suspicion, that I encline to them for any use to be made of their Votes in State-affairs: Tho indeed I never thought any Bishop worthy to sit in that House, who would not Vote according to his Conscience.
I must now in Charity be thought desirous to preserve that Government in its right constitution, as a matter of Religion, wherein both my Judgment is fully satisfied that it hath of all other the fullest Scripture grounds, and also the constant Practice of all Christian Churches; till of late years the Tumultuariness of people, or the Factious∣ness and Pride of Presbyters, or the Covetousness of some States and Princes, gave oc∣casion to some mens wits to invent new models, and propose them under the specious titles of Christs Government, Scepter and Kingdom, the better to serve their turns, to whom the change was beneficial.
They must give Me leave, having none of their temptations to invite Me to alter the Government of Bishops, (that I may have a title to their Estates) not to believe their pretended grounds to any new ways; contrary to the full and constant testimony of all Histories, sufficiently convincing unbiassed men, that as the Primitive Churches were undoubtedly governed by the Apostles, and their immediate Successors, the first and best Bishops, so it cannot in Reason or Charity be supposed that all Churches in the world should either be ignorant of the Rule by them prescribed, or so soon deviate from their Divine and Holy Pattern: That since the first Age, for fifteen hundred years, not one Example can be produced of any setled Church, wherein