Four Queries propounded by His MAJESTY, when the Armies Re∣monstrance was read unto him at Newport, concerning the intended Trial of His MAJESTY.
1. WHether this Remonstrance be agreeable to the former Declarations of the Ar∣my? and if not, whether the Parliament would make good their Votes, that after He had consented to what they desired, He should be in a capacity of Honour, Freedom and Safety.
2. Whether His acknowledgement of the Blood that hath been spilt in the late Wars (nothing being as yet absolutely concluded or binding) could be urged so far as to be made use of by way of Evidence against Him or any of His Party?
3. Whether the Arguments that He hath used in a free and Personal Treaty, to lessen or extenuate, and avoid the exactness of any of the Conditions, though in manner and form only, might be charged against Him as an act of Obstinacy, or wilful persistence in what is alledged against Him, in that He goes on in a destructive course of Enmity against the People and the Laws of the Land, when He hath declared, that His Consci∣ence was satisfied concerning divers particulars in the Propositions.
4. Whereas by the Letter of the Law all persons charged to offend against the Law, ought to be tried by their Peers or Equals, what the Law is, if the Person questioned is without a Peer? And if the Law (which of it self is but a dead Letter) seems to con∣demn him, by what power shall Judgement be given, and who shall give it; or from whence shall the administrators of such Judgement derive their power, which may (by the same Law) be deemed the supreme Power or Authority of Magistracy in the King∣dom?