Forts, Ports, Magazine and Militia of the whole Kingdom would appear to them a Re∣paration
for a single, and (this Circumstance considered) perhaps a disputable, Breach
of Privilege.
The Fourth is, the Treason of the Earl of Strafford, to bring over the Irish Popish Ar∣my
to conquer the Kingdom. To this His Majesty replies, That whatever the Earl of
Strafford could have said (for this Army He is sure was never brought, nor, that He ever
heard, was ever endeavoured to be brought over, either to that or any other purpose)
His Majesty cannot see why it might not have remained buried with him, or why any
other satisfaction should be given for it, or other security against the like, than the Pu∣nishment
he hath already undergone.
Having given what Reasons they can to justifie their Limitations of His Majesty's
Propositions, this Declaration in the next place attempts to satisfie that Reason insisted
on by His Majesty, That it is His Right by Law, (to which they should have added,
and contrary to Law forced from Him;) and not being able to deny that, and yet being
willing to deny something, they quarrel at the Phrase, and deny that this Power of dis∣posing
these Commands is by Law absolutely vested in His Majesty, and that because He is
trusted with them for the Defence and Safety of the Kingdom. His Majesty still justifies
what He said Himself, and yet confesses all that they say too, but only denies the Con∣sequence;
for no Man is absolutely vested in any thing, if being trusted with it to some
end hinder him from being so. The House of Commons is trusted with a Preparatory,
the House of Lords is trusted with a Judicatory, the King, Lords and Commons are
trusted with a Legislative Power, and all these have those Trusts vested in them for the
publick Good; and are not yet all these Trusts absolute, that is, subject to the Control
of no other Power? Is no Man absolutely vested in his Goods, because all we have we
are trusted with for the Glory of God? His Majesty meant only that this was so absolute∣ly
vested in Him by Law, as nothing but a new Law could without Breach of Law take
or hold it from Him.
But the Declaration is content to admit that too, only denies it to be a Reason why
His Majesty should deny to alter that Law, when by Circumstance of Time and Affairs
that Power becomes destructive to the Commonwealth and Safety of the People, the
Preservation whereof is the chief End of the Law. And His Majesty is equally ready to
confess that it is no Reason, but doth absolutely deny that this is the Case, (insisting that
the circumstances of Time and Affairs hare made this Power more necessary than ever to
remain in His Majesty for the protection and safety of His People;) and He claims
Himself to be as absolutely trusted by Law with the final Judgment, whether it be the
Case or no, and with a Power of rejecting any such Alteration upon any such Pretence,
if it appear but a Pretence to Him, as either House is trusted to propose any such Alte∣ration
to the other, or both to Him, if it appear to them necessary and convenient.
But, says this Declaration, the two Houses of Parliament being the Representative
Body of the Kingdom, are the most competent Judges thereof: And says his Majesty,
the Representative Body of the Kingdom is indeed, and that is the King, Lords and Com∣mons;
else either the Head is no part of the Body, or at least will be no longer than the
Body please. Indeed the two Houses in some sense represent the Kingdom, in any
Action which the Law (which is the Rule of the Kingdom) hath intrusted and enabled
them to do; but either one House or His Majesty do equally represent it in any thing
which the same Law hath entrusted and enabled Him or them to do: And for those
Actions in which the Law requires the Consent of all three, every one is to be allowed
their own several distinct Judgment, for themselves only, and any one without the o∣ther
two have as much Right as any two without the third, to represent the Kingdom,
and to be competent Judges of the Case. And His Majesty cannot be take notice
how much Reason He had, not to yield to this Demand, since the grant of this De∣mand
would be received as an Admission of this Case, and it would Logically enough
follow, That if His People cannot be safe and He retain this Power, He doth not
deserve to retain any: And if their Demands were granted, and the Armies upon their
Demands disbanded, this Consequence in all Probability would soon be both perceived
and prest.
But His Majesty may without Prejudice admit both Houses to be the most competent
Judges in this particular, and then put them in mind, that before so many things had
been done by the violent Party to turn the Tide of Fears and Jealousies, before they had
involved the King and Subject in a common Suffering, and equally destroyed all the
Property of the one and Prerogatives of the other by Orders and Ordinances, and so
there then appeared less necessity that this Power should remain in the Crown, either